Kyle Handley
3.3K posts

Kyle Handley
@KyleLHandley
Professor of Economics at @UCSanDiego @GPS_UCSD. Trail runner, gravel biker, news reader, international economist, tweets on all of the above.


You guys should go ask an actual academic economist what they think of Tyler Cowen, who is ostensibly supposed to be an economist. The answer might surprise you.








“No playbook” is not accurate. CBP routinely issues duty refunds when tariffs are withdrawn, reduced, or ruled unlawful. The government knows who paid and under which tariff lines. The scale here is small compared to normal IRS refund operations.






Will we ever know what the Saturday morning Truth Social post was about?



Sen. Moreno says he wants to codify Trump’s existing tariffs (not emergency or Sec. 122) through a reconciliation bill, which would need 50 votes. He says that revenue could be used in a sweeping bill to make tax cuts on tips, seniors, OT permanent

As we argued in the @CatoTrade amicus brief, the refund process can be simple, easy, and fast. Every IEEAPA tariff EO has it own Chapter 99 code in the tariff schedule of the US. They know who paid and how much. It should be like getting a refund from Amazon.com if they messed up state sales tax collection. The govt has processed large refunds in the past when preferential tariff programs were renewed in arrears.

Asked Speaker Johnson if Trump admin should refund $134B in tariff proceeds after SCOTUS ruling. “I don't think so. The White House is going to sort that out and we have to give them the time and space to do it. This is an unprecedented event, so there's no playbook to follow”






A few days ago, a judge summarily dismissed Edelman v Harvard, finding that the faculty review board procedures were reasonably believed to be contractual. A thread. 👇 edelman-v-harvard.org/docs/sj-decisi…





Hassett: “The Fed’s independence extends to its research. It and it alone must decide what research to conduct to further its mission. The authors of this study are all excellent economists. We differ strongly on this particular paper. But I did not mean to impugn their excellent reputations and regret my choice of words.”



