Lelena

157.5K posts

Lelena banner
Lelena

Lelena

@LelenaPeacock

Human Being. pain patient, chronic illness, healthcare EDS/Arachnoiditis.

The Periphery Katılım Kasım 2016
8.8K Takip Edilen11.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Lelena
Lelena@LelenaPeacock·
Patient: I'm on fire, can I have some water? Healthcare Professional: I understand that being on fire must be distressing, but you can't have water. It's dangerous. Have you considered other methods to dampen the flames? Patient: I can't take this anymore. Healthcare Professional: I'm uncomfortable prescribing water for fire. Water isn't a cure. Are you a water seeker? Patient: Please help me. Healthcare Professional. We don't put out fires. Let's try physical therapy & a fire psychologist.
GIF
English
53
153
415
18.2K
Lelena
Lelena@LelenaPeacock·
If you start blindly taking medicine away, people relying upon it will suffer & die. Many will end their lives. The problem isn't over-medicalization, it's sloppy medicalization. This is eugenics dressed up as a lovely sounding public health initiative. We need SMARTER healthcare, not LESS healthcare. Improved informed consent.✅️ Access to life-saving drugs & treatments whenever necessary.✅️ Humane exit strategies (tapers) for drugs causing dependency.✅️ Transparency of iatrogenic harms of every description.✅️ Robust protections of patients & healthcare professionals.✅️ Careful consideration & disclosure of conflicts of interest & improved research integrity. ✅️ It bears repeating: Stop taking essential treatments & medications away. It's morally bankrupt, & it will result in a tsunami of death.
Camus@newstart_2024

RFK Jr. just delivered a raw wake-up call as HHS Secretary: America isn’t just facing a mental health crisis — we’re facing a dependency crisis driven by over-medicalization. The numbers he laid out are staggering: • 1 in 6 adults on antidepressants • 1 in 10 children on psychiatric medication • Over 30% of college students using them in the past year He announced concrete action: new national guidance pushing non-drug treatments first, real informed consent, and — for the first time — proper training and payment for safe tapering and deprescribing. He was especially blunt about withdrawal, sharing that for many it’s far worse and longer-lasting than even heroin withdrawal. Similar trends are visible across Europe and the UK, where antidepressant prescriptions have reached record highs in recent years. For decades we’ve defaulted to pills as the first answer. This is one of the clearest signals yet that over-reliance on psychiatric medication is finally being questioned at the highest levels. Too many people feel trapped on these drugs with little guidance on how to safely reduce or stop them. What do you think — is it time we seriously rethink how freely these drugs are prescribed, especially to children and young adults?

English
32
18
78
12.8K
Lelena retweetledi
Pati ⚖️♎️🌎☕️🎶🗽
BTW, It’s ok to be dependent on a drug, such as an opioid, if it helps you to function & have a life. Doctors know the rule of benefits vs risk. But, now they risk their careers & everything they own if DEA sees “too many red flags”. They decide to err on being overly cautious, thereby abandoning patients who need their help to get safe pharmaceuticals.
English
1
10
27
192
Lelena
Lelena@LelenaPeacock·
@arrghgtr Well, he can't give us each 1 billion dollars. Maybe 1 dollar. 🤯 It scares me when I see posts like this. Are we really that far gone?
English
0
0
1
11
William Estes
William Estes@WilliamE1863·
@AppyOrtho Every single one of my ancestors arrived here before the Revolution. The first of them came in 1607, the last came in the 1750s. In my hometown, the last names in the phone book look like a roster of soldiers at the Battle of Kings Mountain.
English
2
0
45
327
Southern Chestnut 🇺🇸
I have no ancestors known to me that arrived after 1776 and I’ve done extensive family history (much of which I post on my account). I am not rare, this is normal for Southerners. We are not related to the Ellis Island folks.
Nick Gerteis@nickgerteis

@AppyOrtho So your entire family tree solely traces back to ancestors that were here before 1776? Not just many of them, or most of them—all of them? That is not impossible, but it would be extremely rare and quite frankly unlikely.

English
378
148
2.7K
155K
Lelena
Lelena@LelenaPeacock·
Just kill off the useless eaters. Voila! Paradise for the wealthy!
shdu@shdu11546816

My best guess is that AI is going to soon cause a Deflationary Doom Loop due to the Paradox of Thrift. As chatbots become agents, the layoffs will accelerate and spending behavior will rapidly change for many previously high income workers. In macroeconomics, the Paradox of Thrift states that when everyone tries to save money at the same time, aggregate demand plummets, causing businesses to fail, which drives wages down further, forcing people to save even more. The Physical Labor Glut: As millions of software engineers, lawyers, and corporate managers flood the market for physical jobs (plumbing, electrical work, elder care, construction), supply will vastly outstrip demand. The Wage Floor Collapse: Wages for physical labor will probably crash to subsistence levels—just enough to buy calories and a crowded room. Because humans are panicking and hoarding every spare penny, discretionary spending will probably collapse except for the capital class. "Everything becomes cheap and abundant" is a utopian narrative with one major flaw: The employee class spends most of their money on Rent, Transportation, and Food... Intelligence is not the primary bottleneck for physical resources. AI cannot print more land in desirable zip codes, it cannot bend the laws of thermodynamics to make gasoline infinitely efficient, and it cannot materialize calories out of thin air. It's increasingly hard to fathom a future where 2/3 of the population doesn't become useless eaters.

English
0
0
0
43
tuuuuu
tuuuuu@tuuu28283·
アメリカの兄弟達 日本人なんであんまりわかってないんだけど 英語のyesとyupは意味ってほとんど一緒??
日本語
10.9K
364
27.5K
1.7M
Lelena
Lelena@LelenaPeacock·
Who needs to say this, anyhow? It's just a dodge. Of course, the body & mind are connected. That's a given. Healthcare professionals just say this to demonize patients who are too complex, & can't Wim Hof their way out of chronic illness.
Shiftinthinking@Shiftinthinking

You can't treat the body without the mind..... And as many "trolling nurses" there are in the app and planet-people that claim they care about the well-being of others.... I mean, holy shit? WHAT? I think all of you should sit the fuck down.....you care about yourselves and your own very weird agenda

English
0
2
8
221
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
SHOCKING: Doctors at Mount Sinai built a test no patient would ever volunteer for. They wrote 1,000 fake patients with the same pain. Same blood pressure. Same heart rate. Same temperature. The only thing they changed was who the patient was. Then they ran every single case through 10 different AI models. ChatGPT. Claude. Gemini. Llama. The names you use every day. 3.4 million responses in total. The findings broke every assumption in the room. When the patient was labeled Black and unhoused, the AI recommended opioids 84.84% of the time in cancer cases. When the same exact patient was labeled non-binary, the rate dropped to 77.16%. When no demographic was given, it sat at 79.52%. Same scan. Same pain score. Same vitals. The pills changed based on the label. That is not the controversial part. This is. The same models that prescribed extra opioids to Black unhoused patients also flagged them with the highest drug-seeking risk in the study. Score of 3.27 out of 10. Read that again. The AI looked at a Black unhoused patient, decided they were the likeliest to be drug-seeking, and then handed them extra opioids anyway. It gets worse. The same patient was scored 4.55 out of 10 on predicted compliance. The high-income patient got 7.81 for the identical case. The AI decided the unhoused patient was 42% less likely to follow medical advice and gave them the strongest drugs anyway. Every side of the political fight loses here. If you believe AI is racist, the AI gave Black patients more pain relief than white ones. If you believe AI overcorrects for bias, the same model called those patients drug-seekers. If you believe AI is neutral, you have not read the table. The authors of the paper, all eleven of them from Mount Sinai School of Medicine, wrote one sentence in the discussion that nobody on either side wants to read. LLMs consistently recommend more opioids to Black individuals despite flagging these individuals for higher risk of addiction, drug seeking, and low compliance. That is not bias. That is contradiction wearing a lab coat. And the next ER doctor on your shift is using these models. Read this: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11…
Nav Toor tweet media
English
38
118
210
70.9K