Mr H 🩸🩸🩸

401 posts

Mr H 🩸🩸🩸 banner
Mr H 🩸🩸🩸

Mr H 🩸🩸🩸

@LHardy9191

CULT DAO

Katılım Mart 2025
238 Takip Edilen128 Takipçiler
Nala
Nala@ItsNala·
ETH is dead BTC is too slow SOL is filled with scammers XRP is for old people What’s the solution?
English
928
21
506
58.9K
Crypto.com
Crypto.com@cryptocom·
Which project isn’t getting the attention it deserves?
English
957
69
624
80.7K
Rayce Rapoza 🩸🩸🩸
Rayce Rapoza 🩸🩸🩸@raycerapozaR2·
You're just helping set the stage for @ModulusZK to both replace ETH and enhance all the assets built on it. Layer X is the future your talking about but you wont even admit we exist. We're also going to help Bitcoin fix all its problems with Bitlogic $CULT DAO will be the most valuable coin ever made and only those who care about the OG Cypher Punk vision know that.
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

English
1
4
31
558
Crypto Fergani
Crypto Fergani@cryptofergani·
You want generational wealth this cycle? Then wake up and stop ignoring the basics: You’ve heard it a million times, “Buy into fear. Sell into greed.” But most of you still hesitate when it matters. Fear makes you weak. Greed makes you reckless. Break that cycle, Or stay broke watching others take what could’ve been yours. This is your moment. Don’t waste it.
English
89
45
320
14.4K
Mr O’Moduluszk
Mr O’Moduluszk@MrOmodulus·
“In the midst of winter, I found there was, within me, an invincible summer.”
English
8
28
107
2.5K
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io@EliBenSasson·
HUGE ALPHA There's something we'll be releasing soon that gets me excited to a level I've not been excited since realizing ZK are the endgame of scaling and privacy. That was 13 years ago. This NEW SOMETHING will be the next phase of blockchain. It'll give people more economic power, social power, coordination power, than anything that's been done so far on blockchain. It'll be Bitcoin --> Ethereum --> Zcash --> THIS. Can you guess what makes my skin go goose bumps?
English
106
25
370
38.1K
McKenna
McKenna@Crypto_McKenna·
Bitcoin yield remains one of the most attractive opportunities in the market. I am yet to meet a team who is able to crack this outside of Coinbase/Morpho for retail but the Institutional market is much larger. Any suggestions? Reach out if so
Eric Balchunas@EricBalchunas

BlackRock just dropped the official S-1 for it's upcoming iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF.. no fee or ticker yet. The strategy is to "track performance of the price of bitcoin while providing premium income through an actively managed strategy of writing (selling) call options primarily on IBIT shares and, from time to time, on ETP Indices."

English
32
1
45
13.9K
Learning Crypto
Learning Crypto@learningcrypto·
7 million BTC (37% of total supply) could be at risk. Is yours at risk too? Find out now.
English
12
8
60
3.3K
Mr H 🩸🩸🩸
Mr H 🩸🩸🩸@LHardy9191·
@IamIanKane just protecting data — it’s redefining how computation, identity, and value move securely in a trustless world. This is privacy as infrastructure, not an afterthought.
English
0
0
0
12
Mr H 🩸🩸🩸
Mr H 🩸🩸🩸@LHardy9191·
@IamIanKane You’re absolutely right — and this is exactly why Modulus matters. Privacy isn’t about disappearing, it’s about programmable control, and Modulus is building the logic layer that makes that possible at scale. With ZK proofs, BitLogic, and quantum-resilient design, Modulus isn’t
English
1
0
1
26
Ian Kane
Ian Kane@IamIanKane·
Privacy isn’t about hiding. It’s about controlling who sees what, when, and why.
English
71
28
203
8.5K
Davinci Jeremie
Davinci Jeremie@Davincij15·
@otokyo__ You and the rest of the world saying we are not good enough when none of the infrastructure would be here without us!!!
English
23
11
478
34.6K
Tokyo
Tokyo@otokyo__·
🤔
Tokyo tweet media
QME
17.5K
578
7.1K
1.6M
Mr H 🩸🩸🩸
Mr H 🩸🩸🩸@LHardy9191·
Everything you know is about to change. $CULT X $MOD is coming. Unstoppable. Unrelenting. Inevitable. Miss this, and you’ll be watching the revolution from the sidelines while the rest of us reshape the universe. 💀 The countdown is over. The snap is coming.#WeAreInevitable
Mr O’Moduluszk@MrOmodulus

I will shred this universe down to its last atom and then create a new one. Teeming with life. That knows not what it has lost, but only what it has been given... a grateful universe. We are inevitable. $CULT X $MOD

English
0
0
0
34
Secure Sovereign 🚀₿🧡
Secure Sovereign 🚀₿🧡@secsovereign·
Bitcoin is facing an existential threat, and it's not quantum computing. Central banks are onboarding trillions into CBDC control grids. They'll market them as "Bitcoin, but better" - faster, more functional, institutionally backed. Bitcoin's response? Frozen governance. Petty infighting. Critical improvements blocked for years. Humiliating bugs making it through review. The vulnerability isn't in the protocol - it's in the governance structure. A small group controls the reference implementation that 99% of nodes run. When adversaries have trillion-dollar budgets and geopolitical motives, this becomes a measurable attack surface. I've spent months analyzing 16 years of development data. Every methodological concern is being addressed. The structural problems persist. We're building @BtcCommons to prove there's a better way - transparent rules, distributed decision-making, cryptographic enforcement of governance principles. But if the community keeps denying this problem exists, we're going to lose to adversaries who understand power concentration when they see it. Our choice is to adapt or become irrelevant as CBDCs eat Bitcoin's legitimacy for breakfast.
English
13
12
81
4.3K