Lady J
938 posts
Lady J
@LadyJishere
Do the research before you make up your mind
Katılım Temmuz 2012
208 Takip Edilen63 Takipçiler
no caso do jaime, é extremamente perdoável
☥𝑩𝑳𝑽𝑪𝑲𝑮𝑶𝑳𝑫†@0laribiwa
HBO be picking dudes like this to do heinous, incestuous stuff and expect you to hate them
Português
English
@AldousH57500603 @FearedBuck Both can be true but she shouldn’t film him naked in his home regardless… especially if bro is sleeping. He should be jailed as well.
English
DoorDash driver Olivia Henderson was indicted by a grand jury yesterday and is now facing felony charges of unlawful surveillance and dissemination of an unlawful surveillance image after recording a man passed out with his pants down inside his home without consent and posting the video on TikTok
FearBuck@FearedBuck
DoorDash delivery girl has been arrested on 2 felony charges after recording a man passed out with his pants down in his home and posting it on TikTok during a food delivery. She is being charged with unlawful surveillance and dissemination of surveillance images
English
@meow_f46588 @dennysigned By this logic, the Great Bastards couldnt be bastards because their father was the "royal line" and they have royal blood. But we know thats not true, right? (They were bastard that had to be legitimised by royal decree)
English
@dennysigned They’re legitimate because she’s the heir to the throne lol. It doesn’t matter who their daddy is. She is the royal line. That’s why it was a big deal ab the incest lannisters. They don’t have Baratheon blood aka royal blood. Rhaenyra’s children have her royal blood.
English
rhaenyra’s children are legitimate because laenor claimed them as his idgaf
J Girl@juliethardt
What opinion would you defend until your last breath? 🤔
English
@ThxGoldenKing A king can name their own heir.
English
Rhaenyra certainly exists, but Aegon is the king’s eldest son. Tradition, Andal law and the Great Council all give precedence to sons over daughters. Viserys’s wish cannot overturn centuries of custom.
sof@valarrswife
im sorry but how are people thinking Aegon is the rightful king when Rhaenyra exists
English
Lady J retweetledi
Okay so then Aegon can become king through usurping the throne and now he’s the king and Rhaenyra’s claim is illegitimate because he’s the king and he said so? Why don’t you listen to him and his removal of Rhaenyra as queen if the king’s word is laws?
Lalehan Al-Katib@Lalehan_AlKatib
There is literally no law that says the eldest son has to be the heir and then king. It’s just tradition. The word of the king is what is law. So yes Viserys I can in fact overturn a stupid tradition because his word is what is law. Therefore Rhaenyra is the lawful heir.
English
@Lalehan_AlKatib A king who uses 'my word is law' to override 'stupid tradition' is just announcing his own deposition. Since the tradition is law to the lords, they will inevitably withdraw their support, the only question is when. Examples: Viserys I and Aerys II
English
There is literally no law that says the eldest son has to be the heir and then king. It’s just tradition. The word of the king is what is law. So yes Viserys I can in fact overturn a stupid tradition because his word is what is law. Therefore Rhaenyra is the lawful heir.
𝐀𝐄𝐆𝐎𝐍 𝐈𝐈 𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐀𝐑𝐘𝐄𝐍@ThxGoldenKing
Rhaenyra certainly exists, but Aegon is the king’s eldest son. Tradition, Andal law and the Great Council all give precedence to sons over daughters. Viserys’s wish cannot overturn centuries of custom.
English
@daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop If 'unpopularity' or 'brand safety' is your metric for banning people, then you’ve effectively green-lit banning BLM or minority religions whenever they become bad for the bottom line. You won't answer because you know your logic is only ever applied when it's convenient for you
English
@daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop You said that my comparison of discrimination based on protected grounds to each other is in bad faith, so I listened & used an example that closer to freedom of speech. Is that not the point of a discussion lol?
English
@wisewisewisee @daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop Members of any organized belief system, from PETA to major religions, cld be banned under your rationale of "you could say the members affiliations are causing harm". What objective criteria are you using to ensure this isn't just an arbitrary ban on views you dislike?
English
@LadyJishere @daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop And i guess you could say that niki’s political affilitations are causing actual harm and are actively fighting against the freedom of the met or its attendees. One could argue they’re simply acting in self defense and are in full right to restrict someone trying to restrict them
English
@daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop Would you maintain this stance if the ban was on people who support BLM?
English
@LadyJishere @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop Right but we’re not talking about race religion etc. so that’s a bad faith argument. She said something unpopular with the fashion/art industry and now is dealing with it. Freedom of speech is not freedom of consequences.
English
@wisewisewisee @daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop Some of the examples you gave involve causing actual harm, which is a recognized limitation on free speech. In those specific instances, a ban is justifiable. Your argument fails here because you're comparing causing harm to unpopular opinion
English
@LadyJishere @daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop Dont you think youd be banned from the church if you outwardly said you hated the church? Banned from a museum youre actively griefing? Banned from a bar after causing ruckus?
Its not about being entitled to an opinion fam, its about who youre bothering and how youre doing it
English
@daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop No, its a comparison of principles. Religion is protected because we recognize that people shouldn't be cast out of society for their inner convictions. If 'consequences' just means targeted exclusion for unpopular thoughts, then you're advocating for a social litmus test
English
@daddysParasite @ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop If you endorse a ban of someone from somewhere because of their political opinion, would you also justify a ban on the basis of race, religion, sexuality, etc?
English
@ryannnnnoly @ThePopFlop She’s entitled to an opinion and everyone else is entitled to react to it how they want 🤷♂️
English
@gingermoment5 @julianpatrickR @dennysigned How is your principle applicable in a feudal setting? Even in the real world, your grandparents just agreeing that your mum is theirs doesn't make her theirs. They'd still need to go through court and onto public record. Otherwise, human traffickers would thrive
English
@LadyJishere @julianpatrickR @dennysigned If my great-grandparents said my grandma was their daughter because they adopted her, it is in fact true.
English
@Blonddieee_ A hero on the DL. If we learned anything from green hornet, being a hero out in public makes you weak
English
If you had powers in The Boys universe, would you be a hero or end up just like Homelander?
English
@BARBHIVENATOR_ @dennysigned No. You said it happened, I'm simply asking you to cite your source. I and many others arent familiar with this part of the lore. So, what page did the boys get legitimised by Viserys?
English
@LadyJishere @dennysigned Are you trying to be rude?
English
@dennysigned And Viserys legitimized them too
English
@gingermoment5 @julianpatrickR @dennysigned If multiple parties say something is true, then iy must be true 🙃
English
@julianpatrickR @dennysigned Well considering her sons were legally recognized as Laenor’s son by House Velaryon’s lord, his son (and their father), AND THE KING, that kind of shits on your argument, buddy.
English
English
where you sitting? i'm going 3 and the trip is to paris ykwim
English