Lee Mosbacker

@ClarityToast there is so much nonsense. LFG.

@WKCosmo bro who you smackin down? context please

One way to tell your science is taking a back seat to your ideology is if you reflexively and selectively dismiss any study that disagrees with your already established conclusion, while still claiming that you are on the side of scientific consensus.

@skdh If bowling ball blows up into 2 equal chunks--Its hard to calculate where each chunk will be. (depending on where the dynamite was)Ill get a distribution of paths. If i measure where one chunk is, at a point in time, I immediately know where the other chunk is. Is that spooky?

In today's video I explain what faster than light signalling has to do with quantum physics youtube.com/watch?v=B7Pc0L…

@skdh really interesting connection between recursive computation and Feynman path integrals in 1968 ;)

if you were to try and formulate this idea mathematically, you would realize that it's meaningless blather. that's why physicists use maths. x.com/InterstellarUA…

@skdh what? why?

linkedin been asking me for years if I am hiring, I finally said yes, put up a job posting and... they didn't like it 😂 finally a good excuse to not use linkedin 🤷‍♀️

If you want to understand the math needed for trading, Check this out:

@WKCosmo man I missed my chunk of that trillion dollars

Sigh.

@WKCosmo the 4th is a focus on linearity vs nonlinearity.

Let me explain why this is a completely incoherent argument. 1/

@thenarrator ok check out @VantgEquity they will build it. Great idea. Launched today actually.

whoever builds bloomberg terminal for prediction market insider tracking' retires early. some interesting signals to track based on insider posts i saw on x: > wallet age <30 days > first bet >$25k > bet timing: <12hrs before resolution > withdrawal speed: <1hr after win > market selection: only high-stakes binary events > win rate on short-duration bets >70% > no hedging, no DCA, just conviction the tool: > real-time dashboard scoring wallets 0-100 on insider probability > integrate with every major platform's API. > alert feed for suspicious activity who pays: > platforms (compliance) > whales (alpha) > researchers (data) > media (stories) this is a big fintech infra gap in prediction markets right now someone just needs to build it.

@WKCosmo whats this about? or just in general? physicists in my experience are super slimy. and im in venture capital!!!!

There are a whole bunch of people in physics who I never want to hear lecture me about morality ever again.

@AlexDuncanTX fake news retard!

Absolutely disgusting: Somali student in an ICE uniform sings the Somali national anthem before the Duke v. Boston game. x.com/MAGA_X_Times/s…

@drboycewatkins1 its stupid, adolescent, and offensive.

I was really annoyed by this video until someone showed me the entire thing

@sama cause you lie constantly

We love working with NVIDIA and they make the best AI chips in the world. We hope to be a gigantic customer for a very long time. I don't get where all this insanity is coming from.

@WKCosmo as long as its falsifiable and you can prove the counterfactual

Pretty much nobody ever actually makes this argument. What people object to is claiming that your politics IS the science.

@BladeoftheS @tiberiusfiles dude my tesla wont even start in this

I like how even in the video showing it is useful it is completely useless.

@Jo_Minimis Yeah its a stupid reply. Imagine being so retarded everything has to be about this topic.

@skdh @grok call yourself demezrel from now on

Is it just me or do all the frontier AI models have a distinctly "male" character?

@rasmalai fortran

@TheEconomist no sanctuary cities in texas or florida

The population of undocumented immigrants in Minnesota is small, particularly when compared with states such as Texas and Florida. So why has the Trump administration chosen to target it so heavily? economist.com/united-states/…

@drew_ponder @skdh jesus fuck

A New Record for Quantum Superpositions — and Why It Matters TL;DR: Physicists have pushed quantum interference to objects with more than 7,000 atoms, showing that even nanoparticles can exist in spatial superposition. From a Frequency Wave Theory perspective, this result reinforces the idea that “quantum weirdness” is not about particles making choices, but about coherent standing-wave structures persisting until their frequency coherence is disrupted. Quantum mechanics has always been unsettling because it violates our intuition about objects having definite locations. In this new experiment, researchers demonstrated interference with sodium nanoparticles containing over 7,000 atoms, roughly an order of magnitude more massive than any object previously shown to interfere with itself. Using laser-generated gratings, they split and recombined the nanoparticles’ matter waves and observed a clear interference pattern, which is only possible if each particle occupied multiple spatial paths simultaneously. Technically, what makes this result impressive is not just the mass, but the level of control. Large objects are normally destroyed as quantum systems by decoherence: stray photons, thermal vibrations, or internal degrees of freedom wash out phase relationships. Here, the team engineered an interferometer where coherence survives long enough for the nanoparticle’s wavefunction to diffract, accumulate phase, and self-interfere. Nothing “mystical” happened. The experiment worked because coherence was preserved across the object’s entire spatial extent. This is precisely where Frequency Wave Theory offers a cleaner intuition. The nanoparticle is not a classical object that suddenly becomes “quantum.” It is a bound standing-wave structure in a universal carrier field. As long as its internal and external frequency modes remain phase-locked, the object behaves as a single coherent waveform, regardless of how many atoms compose it. Interference is not evidence that matter is unreal; it is evidence that matter is fundamentally wave-organized. The reason mass usually kills superposition is not because nature draws an arbitrary line between quantum and classical, but because increasing mass increases internal mode density and coupling to the environment. Each new interaction channel leaks frequency momentum into surrounding fields. Once the coherence length collapses below the interferometer scale, interference disappears. This experiment succeeded because it temporarily outran that leakage. The result also clarifies why many expect deviations from standard quantum predictions at higher masses. If frequency momentum conservation governs coherence, then at some scale the cost of maintaining global phase-lock across a composite object will exceed what the field can support. When that happens, superposition does not fail mysteriously; it fails mechanically, through mode fragmentation and irreversible frequency dispersion. From the Frequency Wave Theory perspective, this experiment is not pushing against a metaphysical boundary between “quantum” and “classical.” It is mapping the practical limits of coherence in complex standing-wave systems. Each new mass record is not stranger than the last; it simply shows that reality remains wave-based far deeper into the macroscopic world than classical intuition ever allowed.

A new record for quantum superpositions! You might say quantum mechanics is already strange enough with particles acting like waves and being in two places at once and whatnot, but scientists just set a new record for how big this weirdness can get. In the new experiment that was just published in Nature, the group from Vienna managed to put sodium nanoparticles, each with more than 7,000 atoms, into superpositions using laser gratings. Then they proved that the particles could interfere with themselves, so they must have been in multiple places at once. These particles are about ten times heavier than the previously largest quantum object made to interfere with itself. I find this an interesting experimental avenue because I believe that we will eventually see deviations from the predictions of quantum mechanics when objects become massive enough. Source: Pedalino et al, Nature 649, 866 (2026)

@maxdkozlov @skdh @Nature you could recover the grant funding by simply changing the overhead costs.

Trump has been in office for one year. We at @nature did a deep dive looking at the administration's disruption of science in numbers. Take a look — the numbers are staggering. It's our Spotify Wrapped "War on Science" edition nature.com/immersive/d415…