LegendTrader

84 posts

LegendTrader banner
LegendTrader

LegendTrader

@LegendTrader24

Degenerate Investor + Gambler + CRYPTO📈 🎰 $TEDDY 🧸 $BBBYQ $GME $SHIB $DOGE $XRP $HBAR $SHIV

Miami, FL Katılım Ağustos 2012
48 Takip Edilen32 Takipçiler
jake2b
jake2b@jake2b·
building on the SOFA financial disclosure listing RC as a co-debtor for $BBBYQ, I want to remind everyone of some other anomalies surrounding him throughout the Chapter 11. Bratya became the lead plaintiff of his class action over the moon emoji. often forgotten is that on the same day that the voting had ended the Plan, they attempted to enter the case and made a legal request to be apprised of any and all information that could include a transaction between any party in interest. from docket 2114: to the attentive reader, that should seem very odd. they are in a lawsuit against one individual—who sold his shares!—and yet they want a ton of information about the inner workings of the old $BBBY involving anyone. why? what possible reasoning could they have to justify any and all details about any transaction, if their only interest is litigating RC? isn't that a great question! it makes no sense unless through the discovery process of their case against RC, they uncovered information that would have suggested he is involved with the Reorganization through an affiliate or proxy. then it would make perfect sense. after some negotiations, we see that there was a compromise reached. the details of any transactions were not shared, but to prevent impairing Bratya from their class action, Ryan Cohen was explicitly identified in the Plan as not being a Released or Exculpated Party. this would allow Bratya to continue their class action litigation and so they had no reasonable explanation for why they would need any other details, especially involving any party in interest. — if you have been following, this is an important distinction. as the Holder of Interests within the third-party release, he is a Releasing Party. very important difference! — I will say it again because it is very important to understand: Ryan Cohen was explicitly identified in the Plan as not being a Released or Exculpated Party. here is where things get really interesting. let's establish a timeline: • on September 1, Bratya wants information involving any party in interest; but then.. • on September 7, the Kirkland attorneys admit that the Bratya request had escalated to a potential objection to Confirmation of the Plan and as we just explained; • this was publicly by stating that RC is not a Released or Exculpated Party. but look what else happened before the Confirmation hearing for the Plan: within a few days of the attorneys stating that they resolved the Bratya issue, the Plan is refiled with the court as amended and includes a plethora of edits to the definitions section, the releases, as well as the injunction and exculpation provisions. none of these modifications existed during the voting period. all of these changes came only after satisyfing Bratya to not object to Confirmation by stating that RC will not be a Released or Exculpated Party. the significance of the timing of these changes cannot be understated. what other reason could there be to have to amend definitions, releases and exculpations at the last minute, that had just excluded only ONE specific individual? Bratya found through discovery exactly what $BBBYQ holders have always believed. "in hindsight, it will all be so obvious." if you are curious for more reading, here are a few posts I made in 2024 and early 2025 going over all of the changes in detail: x.com/jake2b/status/… x.com/jake2b/status/… x.com/jake2b/status/…
jake2b tweet mediajake2b tweet mediajake2b tweet mediajake2b tweet media
jake2b@jake2b

one thing I didn't get to spend much time discussing on the Space call was the $BBBYQ Statement of Financial Affairs and it disclosing RC's co-debtor status. first I want to establish the importance and legitimacy of this disclosure. the Statement of Financial Affairs (SOFA) is a document that must be filed with a Chapter 11 and has to be accurate; it is considered perjury to lie. the point of it is to give a history of financial transactions and activities leading up to a company's bankruptcy filing: "The Statement of Financial Affairs is designed to disclose relevant financial information to the bankruptcy court, the trustee, and your creditors. It helps establish an accurate picture of your financial affairs, including your income, expenses, assets, liabilities, and recent financial transactions. The form assists in assessing your eligibility for bankruptcy relief and aids in determining the best course of action for your case." jdsupra.com/legalnews/unde… I am trying to emphasize this point because you cannot dismiss the significance of seeing RC listed here and it is not a mistake. do you really think his lawyers would allow for that when he had two ongoing litigations involving the company? that is ridiculous. it is also not "because he is being sued", that argument is either repeated because someone was too lazy to look, they don't understand what they are reading or they are intentionally being misleading. it is laughable. I'll explain how we know: here we see RC listed opposite the plaintiff of his class action suit before the lead was changed to Bratya. it is listed. here is why you cannot dismiss finding RC in the sofa: because here we see RC listed again, separate of the class action and 16(b) lawsuits. unless you believe that a municipality where there used to be a $BBBY and Baby store location is involved in the litigations against RC, this is what is referred to as a "slam-dunk find." the previous comment was obviously a joke but in case you really did believe (or someone has claimed) that Tyler, TX and several other municipalities are involved in the lawsuits, further in the sofa we will see the city of Tyler disclose to the court exactly why they are in the creditor list: to no one's surprise, they are a taxing authority. do you remember the Texas Taxes and the Comptroller, for who the Plan reserved the right to pursue a third-party for taxes owed by the OldCo? who would agree to that? only an acquirer. RC is listed in the full financial disclosure presented to the US Court that he is a co-debtor of the Old $BBBY company, opposite of a municipality claiming they are owed for county taxes and water utility bills. do you really think that RC's attorneys would allow a "mistake" of this magnitude to exist, when he is being litigated relating to the same business? do you think the signatory for the Statement of Financial Affairs, would make the "mistake" of falsely attributing company debts to a third party, under penalty of perjury? of course not. that would be laughable. make no mistake, that is exactly what this says. RC is a co-debtor for the OldCo and a co-debtor is a person other than who is filing for bankruptcy, who is also legally responsible for paying the debts. there is no alternative interpretation. and you don't have to believe me, it is written at the top of the sofa itself: liable for debt nearly a year after he sold his shares. RC had a chip on his shoulder seeing how the former board treated him and his ideas for transforming the company. he could not turn away from the destruction of shareholder value resulting from the "October 2020 plan" and he held everyone to account as the Holder of Interests through the third-party release. look at the information filed with the US Court and decide for yourself. the facts are right there in front of you and they do not care how difficult it is for anyone "to get there" with their own opinion to believe them.

English
32
85
486
68.8K
LegendTrader
LegendTrader@LegendTrader24·
@ThePPseedsShow GME will not acquire any version BBBY, But DK -Butterfly will be the umbrella ☂️ over GME and many other companies! 🧸 Ryan acquiring isn’t GME acquiring , and the result is set in stone regardless of who rides with us or not!
English
1
0
22
1.7K
ThePPShow
ThePPShow@ThePPseedsShow·
BREAKING 🚨 DR BURRY RANDOMLY TWEETS IF GME BUYS ANY VERSION OF BBBY HE IS OUT
English
71
22
371
28.4K
ThePPShow
ThePPShow@ThePPseedsShow·
WHERES ALL THE FUCKING SHILLS AT?!?!?
English
23
21
327
10.9K
ThePPShow
ThePPShow@ThePPseedsShow·
When Bobby finally gets announced but your already dead inside from all the failed hype dates for 3 years.
English
32
27
511
19.2K
LegendTrader
LegendTrader@LegendTrader24·
@JesseCohenInv This chaos is just from silver alone, what about $bbbyq and $gme and everything else involved? How the fuck are they going to pay us? Find a way to start cash injections to our pockets not the banks and crooked hedge funds!
English
0
0
4
700
Jesse Cohen
Jesse Cohen@JesseCohenInv·
🚨Unconfirmed rumor making the rounds says a major bank collapsed on a silver margin call in overnight trading. I cannot verify that. In any case, watch these banks closely: 1. JPMorgan Chase $JPM 2. HSBC Holdings $HSBC 3. Scotiabank 4. BNP Paribas 5. UBS Group $UBS 6. Deutsche Bank $DB 7. Citigroup $C 8. Goldman Sachs $GS
Jesse Cohen tweet media
English
185
352
1.5K
455.2K
LegendTrader
LegendTrader@LegendTrader24·
@xMarketNews The crypto is moving back up the sentiment is up everywhere, I believe it’s far from over! 🔥
LegendTrader tweet media
English
0
0
1
8
Vivian
Vivian@yolo_n_fukulate·
@Giggle_Pufff @teddy_bbbygme You know what, I have never looked around Schwab (my bbbq got transferred over from TD).. and yes I see my old buys appearing too. I dont know if it was there before or not..
Vivian tweet media
English
7
6
46
21.6K
GigglePufff
GigglePufff@Giggle_Pufff·
The number 075896 has been consistent from the beginning of BBBY through the end of BBBYW, which makes me believe that’s why my old BBBYQ transaction is now showing under the new BBBY Since the new BBBY issued warrants using the same 075896, it feels like the story is continuing
GigglePufff tweet media
English
7
6
113
5.6K
greg
greg@greg16676935420·
@ryancohen Just turned on my N64 come on over
English
250
272
4.4K
136.6K
LegendTrader
LegendTrader@LegendTrader24·
@EvaderDirt @HungryPawnsX @ryancohen @larryvc Seems there’s been a lot of fud towards DRS 🤔 Is this an attempt to get people to move shares back to exchanges? I think so, desperate calls for desperate measures! 🧸
English
0
0
6
150
DirtΞvader
DirtΞvader@EvaderDirt·
@HungryPawnsX @ryancohen @larryvc Impossible. Everyone knows that in order to lend securities, the rules require a custodian that is an SEC registered Broker-Dealer. Oh wait...🤨
DirtΞvader tweet mediaDirtΞvader tweet media
English
6
3
61
2.6K
Salvatore Linteum
Salvatore Linteum@PhantomBlack699·
Ryan Cohen's purchase of $GME doesn't breach insider trading/MNPI if he acquires the shell of $BBBYQ through a reverse merger with Teddy Holdings LLC, as both companies are private and not publicly traded. Sixth Street have carved out a significant amount of the estate (I'll post proof of this once I've clearly written it up) and the millions of dollars in clawbacks (CA_CAW) are flowing into the estate through the previous board of directors and MSC. This is why he moved his equity out of RC Ventures, into his own name in Canada and pledged 22.3M shares as collateral into a Charles Schwab account. He's going to sponsor Sixth Streets debt for equity in Teddy. It's probable Cohen has already used a large amount of capital on $BBBY bonds, as referenced by the entities from the October 2022 note offering (same day as the Carl Icahn picture) all having extended Final Decree estimates (BuyBuyBaby Inc. BBBYTF LLC. etc.) He's also highly likely to have instructed Alvarez & Marsal to represent him, as he's listed as a creditor and codebtor and instructed them to preserve BBB Canada LTD two months before Chapter 11, hence their legal work into historical buybacks and executive compensation packages. There were multiple mentions of meetings with an Activist Investor in the dockets. This is also why he triggered the FTC review for mergers and acquisitions in September 2024 for transactions in 2018-2020 for Wells Fargo. Marcus Lemonis also mentioned they're licensing the Canada Bed Bath operations out in a space call last week, which was deleted after. There's way too much smoke for there not to be fire 🔥
English
22
67
541
31.1K
Salvatore Linteum
Salvatore Linteum@PhantomBlack699·
If you held $BBBYQ through to cancellation, it may be a good idea to check your brokerage/AST logins and passwords are working and secure/accessible. Also check your statements and download all transactions and store them safely to provide proof of ownership in the event of a shareholder friendly acquisition. This is not financial advice, but fucking do it.
English
65
54
499
51.7K
Salvatore Linteum
Salvatore Linteum@PhantomBlack699·
My boy Jake2B would never sit on the couch if he had any doubt.
English
16
30
366
13.5K
Crypto Rover
Crypto Rover@cryptorover·
TRUMP JUST ANNOUNCED A STRATEGIC #BITCOIN RESERVE AND PEOPLE ARE SELLING?? WTF IS THIS BULL MARKET, MAN!!!
Crypto Rover tweet mediaCrypto Rover tweet media
English
1.8K
793
11.5K
1.3M
Justin Brewer
Justin Brewer@justinbrewer33·
The market crash is inevitable. $DJT $TSLA $AMC $GME $XRP are being manipulated more now than before @POTUS took office NOW is the time for an Executive Order temporarily BANNING ALL SHORT SELLING and DEMANDING TRADE SETTLEMENT on all shares @elonmusk @DOGE_SEC @AGPamBondi
Justin Brewer tweet media
English
38
302
925
29.8K
LegendTrader
LegendTrader@LegendTrader24·
@BobbyCat42 @larryvc I wonder what threat Ryan Cohen poses for him to be attacked with law suits from every angle? 🤔 💭 He’s just a 🧸 it’s mind boggling!
English
0
0
4
101
BoBBY🧸
BoBBY🧸@BobbyCat42·
@larryvc If only Ryan wasn't tied up in court 🤐
BoBBY🧸 tweet media
English
3
2
70
2K
Larry Cheng
Larry Cheng@larryvc·
My anecdotal evidence suggests that companies whose CEOs consistently dialogue with customers in the public square (e.g. social platforms, etc) outperform those companies whose CEOs don’t.
English
119
78
971
44.4K
forky 🦋
forky 🦋@bbbwhyy·
THE REAL KCS Ryan Cohen played the market like a grandmaster, leading everyone to believe he was after Buy Buy Baby when in reality, his true target was the bankrupt shell of BBBYQ itself. The signs were there—high short interest, valuable NOLs ETC... By directing attention toward Buy Buy Baby, he kept retail and institutional investors focused on the wrong prize while the real asset—BBB’s corporate shell—remained overlooked. In classic Kansas City Shuffle fashion, when everyone was looking right, Cohen went left. Now, with a potential clean shell, tax benefits, and the ability to engineer a squeeze, the real game is just beginning. Checkmate - TIME♟️🔥
English
31
53
395
34.7K