LegitBro

Muslims have now realize that Allah NEEDS to be the Father to make him the God of the prophets. So they now claim Allah is a father in some sense . While Allah himself has zeroed that out completely. Why are Muslims so desperate 😂

All it takes to completely demolish Dawah lies is to hold up 3 different Qurans and watch these guys panic. We're going to be introducing a new Quran dilemma on this tomorrow at 5:00 PM EST live on YouTube with @Acts17David @Fearless__Truth @JaiNDoC_RL Muslims, have fun with the incoming shubuhat.

@SSGISHERE Sorry Muhammadan 😂😂... Next time I will pause my life and businesses to attend to you 🤡

@LegitBrov And he replies 3- 4 days later… come again next time when you see me on another post U already bored me off

Muslim: There is only one God, Allah, and that is who all the prophets worshipped. Me: No, the prophets revealed in the Bible worshipped Yahweh. Muslim: Yes, Yahweh means God. Allah is just the Arabic word for God, so they worshipped Allah too. We all serve the same God, you people just mixed things up by worshipping a man. Me: Actually, Yahweh doesn’t simply mean “God.” Yahweh means “I AM WHO I AM.” It is the personal covenant name God revealed in the Bible. And no, we do not worship the same God. Muslim: Allah can also be called Yahweh, it doesn’t matter. Me: Why are you trying so hard to attach another deity’s name to Allah? Did Allah ever personally reveal his name as Yahweh? Muslim: That was just the name revealed to the Israelites, not a universal name. Me: 😂 Bro, it is the God revealed in the Bible personal name, and it is universal. Stop saying what you don’t know. Your Allah is not Yahweh, he doesn’t even have a personal covenant name revealed like that. Muslim: Allah is the supreme God, so he can be called Yahweh too. Me: Can you Pray in the name of Yahweh? Muslim: Is one God, so it doesn’t matter.. Me: Okay then, say this: “Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, reveal Yourself to me and make me serve You.” Muslim: 😂😂😂 You’re not serious. Me: Go ahead and say it na, since Allah’s name is Yahweh. Muslim: …… Me: Hello? 😂 Where did you go? Don’t disappear now. Say it with confidence na. Muslim: May Allah guide you to Islam, the right path. Me:🙄🙄 You really can’t make this stuff up 😂 When it’s convenient: “Allah and Yahweh are the same!” But the moment you say: “Okay then, pray to Yahweh by name…” They suddenly have Amnesia.

@SSGISHERE The are co-equal in the NATURE they share .... So if you already accepted they are equal in the divine Nature.. Are they sharing the human nature??? So why would you expect equality in the human nature???

@LegitBrov “ Where is your evidence for that ? You think the Trinity is supposed to follow how you want ...Contradiction??? ...” Bro, I’m going by what the trinity says. It says the son is Co equal to the father in nature. So it makes no sense if theyre Co equal & not co equal

@SSGISHERE Still no evidence for your claims

@LegitBrov It’s not a claim but a proof bcuz we have eyes to read the NKJV

@SSGISHERE 1- different nature, so different. 2- wrong , Quran is in a tablet ...Surah Al-Buruj (85:21-22)... So exist separately from Allah Also the Hadith I posted, it was a pale man ... Except if that pale man is Allah ...so exist separate from Allah

@LegitBrov No. No.

@SSGISHERE 1- Allah teaching how to pray Source : trust me bro Hadith 🤣🤣🤣 Allah was praying and begging like a rat in his divine state oo 🤣🤣 2- I can see you don't have any defense for Allah asking for loan 🤣🤣... Please drop account

@LegitBrov “ Muslims are used to lying” Christian’s like u are used to not reading . Already agreed it’s Allah speaking. So thanks for showing me a prayer verse to Allah 2. If you say so. Still, it’s trust me bro. Good for u.

@SSGISHERE In your heart , you know this is false .... How does a verse which doesn't in any way shape or form indicate that it's a teaching of prayer turn to that ??? This is simple a reaction from Muslim seeing the problem, then fabricated a Hadith as usual

@LegitBrov I’ll tell u why. Because the prophet says it’s a prayer. No Muslim believed it’s a prayer. and most importantly, the verse starts with Allahs name. Muslims Arent called “ Allah” or “ ar Rahman ar Raheem” Very easy

@SSGISHERE Good, then we are in agreement ... This is Allah speaking ✅

@LegitBrov “Muslims don't need to believe it for it to be true . That's my point ... Muslims tend to reject truth if it affects Islam.” Bro. No problem. U believe that cool. Good for u 😂😭 At least your Bible and whole Christian community agree with me. As well as ur apologetics

@SSGISHERE "proof"

@LegitBrov I’m talking about Ibn kathir. U said you provided scholarship evidence that Allah is dependent and needs a woman. Then I said you have 0 proof. Then you said u showed proof But, again I said no Then u showed a screen shot from Ai that has nothing to do with ibn kathir 😂

@SSGISHERE Thank you for burying Unitarianism to the ground, cos even the earliest church Fathers are Trinitarians. Heretics are not Christians

@LegitBrov Wow. Ur Still this brain dead? since u want to keep Acting like u didn’t read. Thank You for burying the trinity. So now the trinity teaches that father is greater than Jesus and is the ultimate authority over Jesus. 😭🤦🏽‍♂️

@SSGISHERE Idiot 😂🤣🤣🤣..... Even after showing the AI response and obviously showing that I am talking about that Yes part .... You kept arguing about it... This proves you didn't want to understand it ... because if you agree , your argument is gone

@LegitBrov Thats your own problem for not being able to make a proper statement then. Not my fault u lack communication skills: Even your own AI didn’t just answer with “ yes” Bcuz it knows your statement makes no sense That’s why it says “ if you mean” Grilled.

@SSGISHERE 1- Are you saying Quran has same nature with Allah ??? 2- the Quran is a separate entities on a table 3- how does it lack will, when it speaking back to Allah 🤣 4- you're making things up

@LegitBrov 1. “Quran doesnt have the nature of Allah” bcuz the Quran is the nature of Allah. It’s his word ( attribute) . not like the jesus the son with his own mind & will. 2. It’s the word of Allah 3. Yes, & it lacks it own will. 4. No one’s making things up

@SSGISHERE "According to theology, it’s not. It’s an attribute" You mean Islamic theology 🤣🤣😂😂.... Islamic theology creates knew definitions for already existing words 🤣🤣😂😂...

@LegitBrov “ this is your tactics, argue about the argument instead of facing the point I bring” Well, stop accusing me of shifting. Cuz that’s exactly what I was point out. “ it is a being” According to theology, it’s not. It’s an attribute

@SSGISHERE NO, Christians have been doing so before your historians

@LegitBrov Bro, Of course Christians already knew and preserved Church Father writings within their communities. My point is that historians and textual scholars are the ones who critically study, preserve, compare manuscripts, analyze & publish those sources for us to read.

@SSGISHERE More like , I agree with them , but I want I video evidence from 2nd century CE 🤣🤣

@LegitBrov Not sure if yorue getting the point. historians already acknowledge that early Church Fathers may preserve genuine early traditions connected to apostolic communities. But that still does not change the category of evidence especially with the available info we have rn

@SSGISHERE Hahahahaha.... This is interesting.... " I agree with you but I disagree with you" 😂😂🤣🤣

@LegitBrov And historians take those Church Fathers seriously as historical sources. Nobody is denying that. But at the point is a source confidently asserting something is still not the same thing as independent direct verification. Ethiopians and every one believe the same thing u say

@SSGISHERE 1. They are not Christians and they are wrong 2. "Many Christian scholars" 😂😂🤣... Bro only Trinitarians are Christians 😂😂... Claiming heretics are Christians doesn't make them Christians ...

@LegitBrov 1. If that’s what u believe, fine. I have no issues with u believing the ebonites are not Christians & that u follow the books of the apostles. Others think the same 2. Bart Ehrman is not the only 1 saying these things. Many Christian scholars including trinitirians like u.

@SSGISHERE Good, so we are in agreement then , the Bible and Church fathers are the primary sources, but you're trying to push Unitarian, atheist etc scholars/historian opinions on me... When it clearly against the Bible and church Fathers....

@LegitBrov Church Fathers, manuscripts, language, dating, historical context, & then draw conclusions from the evidence. Even conservative Christian scholars use historical methodology. This is a neutral way

@SSGISHERE It's not a matter of Faith alone .... We are sure who wrote them , 100% sure .

@LegitBrov And that’s what other groups say bro. That’s what they believe. 😂 So at the end of the day, it’s just a matter of faith.