@legalmosaic Great article! Another big missing piece is how few lawyers actually conduct detailed numeric modelling and case evaluations, leaving clients no clear answer to the basic question: “what’s this litigation really worth?”
Litigation works well for lawyers, but not clients. Its focus is on reacting to disputes, not avoiding or resolving them quickly, efficiently, and with access to early-stage, material information and data. That's changing. forbes.com/sites/markcohe…#digitallitigation#legalchange
@lawdotcom A key first step is GCs requiring external lawyers start advising in numeric terms. For litigation advice, the tools and techniques are already available to do this: decision analysis provides robust numeric risk analysis and evaluation
Just wanted to say a big thanks🙏 to all the tech companies + law firms that have done AL TV interviews + Product Walk Throughs in 2020/21
> Viewers are now watching many 1,000s of minutes per month across the AL TV Library + most vids are 15 min long.
artificiallawyer.com/product-walk-t…
@GTeninbaum For those heading to litigation, I suggest litigation risk analysis, AKA decision trees. Hard to learn on one's own, helps systematically value cases (with financial claims), and serves to align strategy + views of a team.