SoLiu
89 posts
老查的 2025 年终总结 🔥 40分钟AI中英字幕完整版
（Some End of Year Thoughts）
🧠 行业迷失：贪婪、投机、没有使命
🤖 AI 逼近现实：工作被替代，人被边缘化
🏛️ 政治失灵：政府画大饼，权力不可信
💀 精英冷漠：普通人被视为“可丢弃”，新的奴隶制即将到来
🔁 因果循环：今天不是你，不代表明天不会轮到你
🕊️ 唯一出路：回到第一原则，把自由还给人
⚠️ 核心一句话：
2025 不是牛熊之年，
而是世界需要冷静、人类需要自由的一年
🧬 GIVE EVERY HUMAN THEIR GOD-GIVEN LIBERTY BACK.
中文
@tianyecai @u902124 他只能骗骗傻子，需要证据吗？个人电脑刚出来的时候据说只需要640K 内存对于任何人来说都足够了，你现在用用看。只有更快才能解锁更多创新，有证据证明Solana不安全吗？一个宗教链，天天骗信徒。啥创新没有！只知道喷粪，他的九头蛇呢？吹的牛皮到底还是吹破了吧！
中文
🚨 BREAKING:
Charles Hoskinson: Being as Fast as Solana Is EASY!!
💥 老查点破一个被很多人回避的事实 🤯
把链做得很快
其实不难
2018 年就已经有方案能做到
真正难的是：
在高去中心化，强安全性，拜占庭容错 + 可恢复性
全部成立的前提下
还保持长期可持续
Solana 解决的是
👉 “现在要快”
Cardano 解决的是
👉 “30 年、50 年、100 年还能不能活”
🧨 快，可以很简单
但不被夺权、不被腐化、不被摧毁
这才是真正困难的工程
🐍 这也是为什么
Cardano 选择慢一点
但要把更难的那条路走完
中文
Credit where credit is due: they have built a very nice gui in the last 4 years
ltrd@ltrd_
I don't care about the @jump_firedancer, but I can say that it is definitely one of the best GUI/Dashboard that I have ever seen. Absolute art for me.
English
@usd666666 所以说女人是低智商生物，不是男人没有想到，而是觉得太低级了，但确实很有效果。逆反心理是个什么鬼！如果我是女的，我肯定非常讨厌这种虚伪一眼假的男的，男的但凡钻研点话术都能骗一大批这种傻逼，如果明知道对方是这种傻逼，我肯定也没有兴趣撩。
中文
@HarishDGupta @Cointelegraph No Investors are not fools, they will vote with their actions.
English
⚡️ TODAY: Sui passes proposal to recover Cetus funds through a one-time protocol upgrade.
English
Decentralization means many must act — not none. Proud of the Sui stakers and validators who overwhelmingly stepped up to support the users and builders affected by the theft. This community takes care of its own.
English
@matteodotsui This is a joke, blockchain does not need a centralized company, blockchain is decentralized. Sui is a deformed blockchain.
English
@jave_gg @starplatinum_ This is not a question of the degree of decentralization, it is a question of the principle of decentralization.
English
@starplatinum_ There isn't an absolute decentralization in this space
Doesn't make sense to hate on SUI for it
English
This is one of the dumbest takes I’ve seen in a while.
Gainzy said SUI is worthless because it’s “centralized.”
Let’s break that down:
After the Cetus hack, Sui validators froze $162M from the hacker.
But they weren’t forced.
Each validator chose to block the wallet using a config file.
No one was told what to do.
Now the community will vote what to do with the funds.
Sui Foundation won’t vote.
Only validators and holders through delegation.
That’s not centralization.
Ethereum reversed a hack.
Solana paused the chain.
Bitcoin had a bug that printed 184B BTC.
Also, this guy says Sui only pays KOLs
While he’s getting paid by PumpFun to stream.
Every chain has paid creators or systems like Kaito to have more mindshare
It’s called marketing
English
🚨 PSA: The Move debate? Already settled. #Sui isn’t just ahead — it’s lapping the field.
This ecosystem is moving too fast, too smart, and simply can’t be out-innovated. Lets BUIDL!
English
@cryptofunnyguy @SuiNetwork Even if it falls into the hands of criminals, shouldn't someone be held responsible? Shouldn't Cetus be held responsible? Please tell me, if the criminals cannot be found, are all people innocent?
English
@SuiNetwork Many real people lost life savings in the Cetus attack.
Some took out loans. Some are still holding hope.
This vote is not just technical — it’s moral.
Let’s show them the Sui community stands with victims.
I vote YES to bring the stolen funds back.🙏
English
Cetus has requested a community driven vote to recover the funds frozen following last week’s hack.
In response, the Sui Foundation has released code for an onchain community vote. Sui validators can cast votes, and Sui holders can also vote directly through stake delegation. Sui Foundation stake will not be counted.
If the community vote is approved, the funds will be recovered from the attacker and held in a multisig trust account until they can be returned to accounts who had positions in Cetus. The community vote is part of Cetus’s larger recovery plan to ensure all account holders are made whole, which includes use of Cetus’s treasury and obtaining a loan from Sui Foundation.
While the validators cast votes, you, the Sui community, are represented by where your holdings are staked. You may change your stake delegation to a validator who voted in alignment with your preference. Validator votes will be displayed in public dashboards, which will be shared when the vote begins today at 1:00pm PT.
See the blog post below for details, including code and participation information.
Cetus🐳@CetusProtocol
🚨 Dear Sui community, We are working diligently together with Inca Digital, security and analytics providers, and law enforcement officials across the world to recover the $60M worth of stolen funds. In parallel, we are asking the Sui community to support a protocol upgrade to recover the $162M of frozen funds and return them to their rightful owners. No one can make this decision unilaterally. We propose an on-chain vote involving the network’s major participants, including validators and SUI stakers, to decide on whether this upgrade is in the best interest of the Sui community. We want to recover and return the stolen funds, but we will respect whatever the community decides. Thank you for your patience. We will work closely with Sui validators and the Sui Foundation on the details of implementing our proposed vote. 🌊
English
@AndersonLAS1 @SuiNetwork Even if it falls into the hands of criminals, shouldn't someone be held responsible? Shouldn't Cetus be held responsible? Please tell me, if the criminals cannot be found, are all people innocent?
English
@SuiNetwork Decentralization does not mean anarchy. I vote in favor of approval and the restoration of a theft. It is not fair for these funds to remain frozen or at the disposal of a criminal while there are innocent victims who have been harmed.
English
Yes, Solana is centralized and yes @toly is aware of it, which is why he tries to muddy the waters on decentralization every chance he gets and no Toly doesn't care b/c the lab/foundation model allows him to divorce himself from any real accountability. If you hold $SOL I hope you understand this.
toly 🇺🇸@toly
Decentralization test is objective, not a bunch of subjective hand wavy bs: 1) can a minority unilaterally block the majority from making changes or functioning then it’s not decentralized 2) can the majority block the minority from exiting or forking its own chain (for example: withhold data, emergency upgrading the bridge contract) then it’s not decentralized It’s not that hard people.
English
@SuiInsiders The problem is not the hacking, the problem is the blacklist mechanism. If it happens once, there will be countless times. Believe me! This goes against decentralization and anti-censorship mechanism. Sorry! I am disappointed!
English
@RogerMa95197435 @SuiInsiders The problem is not the hacking, the problem is the blacklist mechanism. If it happens once, there will be countless times. Believe me! This goes against decentralization and anti-censorship mechanism. Sorry! I am disappointed!
English
@SuiInsiders Of course.
L1 wasn't hacked
$SUI still super strong
English
Completely agree here.
It’s no secret that @SuiNetwork has only around 100 validators, it’s not fully decentralized yet.
So Sui basically had two options yesterday,
1. Do nothing and let the hacker steal $230M. Sure, that might've saved them from today’s criticism about not being truly decentralized, even though it’s publicly obvious as they only have 100 validators.
2. Step in, take action, and protect their main LP provider and, honestly, all the effort they’ve put into building the ecosystem.
Any serious protocol would’ve done what Mysten did yesterday. Saving $230M is just common sense, way better than pretending to be decentralized just to avoid some backlash.
English
This was 100% the right move.
If you don't take advantage of the benefits of centralization while you can, you're just fighting with your hands behind your back. If Coinbase and the rest of Ethereum L2s can unilaterally control all bridge funds, if Hyperliquid can unilaterally shut down a market at an any price, and if Solana DeFi can unilaterally upgrade their programs to arbitrary code, then Sui should be allowed to fight back against a literal villain.
In the long term, censorship resistance and immutability will win, but in the short term, as we've seen over the past year, the entire meta is centralization.
f(gautham)💤@gauthamzzz
A hacker stole $223M from Sui yesterday. Then something unprecedented happened. Sui validators literally banned him from the network and froze his funds mid-escape. This changes everything we thought we knew about "decentralized" blockchains. Here's the wild story 🧵
English
@armaniferrante In the long term with enough pressure those validators can be forced to run the same deny list and censorship prevails.
English