Robert Brown

@listenJimGreene @Thrillho83 @Sassafrass_84 @LikeToasters Ok do you want them to sing his praises?

@Thrillho83 @Sassafrass_84 @LikeToasters Here’s a few from blue sky

Why is it every single time a conservative dies the left celebrates? People are celebrating the death of Chuck Norris. What tf is wrong with you people?

@JohnnyUktena @Rahll Btw source. I'm literally building one from the ground up, and I'm taking a different approach to the ability to actually remember things is the first of those differences.

@JohnnyUktena @Rahll Knowlodge. When you see an AI "reproduce" something, it's typically the result of a couple of things happening. Extremely detailed prompts designed to guide it to that exact result, or it looks for references on the internet, which many can do. Most often it's a combination.

"AI doesn't memorize the data it's trained on, it just creates probabilistic patterns and relationships so effectively that it can reproduce the data!" So, memorization.

@elonmusk Every single data point backs him up Elon. Either you are a complete idiot or your favorite pastime is to constantly lie on here which is it?

He’s such a liar

@1True_American_ Imagine the horror of living in the most productive and prosperous state in the Union.

Seriously. You could always be a Californian.

@DougSwaffield @AveryDaye They refute the message plenty, which is why they attack the messenger at this point.

@AveryDaye They’ve resorted to attacking the messenger, because they can’t refute the message.

Nick Shirley exposes 170M in fraud in California. Like the loser Gavin Newsom is, he attacks Nick Shirley instead of addressing the obvious fraud he found. Stopping fraud should be bipartisan. The fact it's not shows where the Democratic Party is. They only stand in opposition, so they stand for nothing. They also understand their politicians and constituents are the beneficiaries of the fraud, so they care more about votes and power than doing right by the citizens they're supposed to be serving. It's truly pathetic.

@samthelion79 @Sassafrass_84 Because she's full of shit, and so is this Iran is about to get a nuke argument. And if you haven't figured that out over the decades that Iran has been just around the corner from a nuke then you need to do our country a real favor and never vote again.

@Sassafrass_84 Girl, why all of the sudden are people attacking you? It's pretty wild

Shots fired pew pew. 💀

@AmericanAlphaX @DanielleMejiaCA I find it really hard to be infuriated by the content of someone who keeps scamming the gullible into thinking he's finding all this fraud.

@DanielleMejiaCA This should infuriate every American who pays taxes. We go without plenty of times and sacrifice giving our family things so that the Democrats can give our tax dollars to fraudulent and corrupt programs to buy votes to stay in power! You don’t have Democrats enough!

👀

@Transmaxxed @_celia_bedelia_ The only people I've seen who think like cultists are the lot of you. And it would be far more amusing if you didn't insist on fucking with others because you don't know shit about anything.

@Livingmasterkey @_celia_bedelia_ We are already ignoring cultists like you.

a lot of TERFs/GCs just keep admitting they’ve never proper dealt with their gender dysphoria

@Transmaxxed @_celia_bedelia_ You go ahead and keep thinking that. You are wrong. But you just keep thinking that to yourself over and over again and I'm sure that the universe will continue to ignore you.

@Livingmasterkey @_celia_bedelia_ Gender identity is as real as imaginary friends …

@Transmaxxed @_celia_bedelia_ The only bullshit I continue seeing here is from you. Gender Identity is very real and researches have a great deal of knowledge and understanding on the topic. While I get you are committed to remaining an idiot it's just laughable.

Gender Definition 1. Referred to gendered language, like French, where everything, including inanimate objects is assigned either a male or female sex in words, prefixes or suffixes. Definition 2. Referred to biological sex. Not the act of sex. Gender = sex, therefore gender identity is bullshit!

@jackunheard So members of congress won't vote for your voter suppression fantasy and support your piss poor understanding of security and that means they are committing treason? Check yourself into a mental hospital.

So, let me get this straight… The people WE voted in and PAY the salary of are committing treason by refusing to pass the SAVE Act. And we are expected to just pay taxes and stay quiet? Is anyone else pissed?

@Transmaxxed @_celia_bedelia_ Not at all. You however are weirdly ignoring little things like the word or and the other definitions because surprise those also exist and are just as valid. And as amusing as your flailing about is I also find it rather sad and pathetic at this point.

@Livingmasterkey @_celia_bedelia_ Blah, blah, blah. I sent you the definition 1. of gender with highlights on the reference to SEX? Are you conveniently ignoring that?

@4Saken0rder2025 @AdamShurey @SwipeWright And this wasn't something in the faraway past either. There are people living today who experienced this firsthand. You hate on DEI for working to correct that, but you don't really offer any other solutions than pretending it's all good now and ignoring the lingering problems.

@4Saken0rder2025 @AdamShurey @SwipeWright You can argue that some people are getting a leg up based on race or gender, etc. And yeah, you can make that argument. But these same people were denied that opportunity for generations based on those same factors.

"Why did you identify this as one of the craziest grants?" "Because it references feminist and queer insights into prison abolition and LGBTQ studies." "Any other reasons?" "No." Legendarily based. 😆

@influencertrash @djclearycomcas1 @marklevinshow They constantly run their mouths about the lack of arrests and prosecutions for their fictions, and yet they never can figure out that the actual reason is what they think is fiction.

@djclearycomcas1 @marklevinshow You’d think. But you’ve been lied to. If they had anything on him, they’d at least try to arrest him.

What’s the cost of nuclear missiles fired at our country, you degenerate demagogue.

@marklevinshow Here's my blunt response to this. Shut the fuck up if you haven't caught on by now that they are not building nuclear weapons and have had no intention of doing so for decades now, then you are too fucking stupid for anyone to take seriously.

@4Saken0rder2025 @AdamShurey @SwipeWright You spent all that time and yet you somehow managed to get things wrong its kind of funny.

Step 1: Critical Theory starts back in the 1930s.A group of smart left-wing thinkers (Frankfurt School folks) looked at society and said: "Hey, laws and systems aren't neutral—they're built by powerful people to keep power. Even if they look fair, they secretly screw over the little guy." Think of it like spotting hidden rules in a game that always favor the rich kid. Step 2: It jumps to law school in the 1970s–80s.Some law profs (Critical Legal Studies) took that idea and ran with it: "The law isn't blind—it's rigged by class, money, whoever's on top." Worked okay in that narrow world—good for poking holes in old-school legal BS. Step 3: Then liberals (mostly academics) said, "Wait, what about race?"They grabbed the same toolbox and added color: "Laws don't just favor the rich—they favor white people too. Racism isn't just bad cops; it's baked into contracts, schools, prisons, everything." Boom—Critical Race Theory (CRT) is born in the late 80s/early 90s. Same logic: power hides in "neutral" rules, but now it's about race, not just class. Step 4: Fast-forward to today—DEI.Companies, schools, governments take CRT's ideas and turn them into action plans: "We gotta fix the hidden bias—hire more diverse people, train everyone on equity, include voices that got shut out." Sounds nice on paper, but critics say it's just CRT dressed up as HR policy—pushing quotas, guilt-tripping, or reverse discrimination under "inclusion" labels. So yeah: started as brainy critique of power in law → got race added → went mainstream as DEI. One big "power is sneaky" idea, remixed over time. No magic, just people tweaking the same hammer for new nails. Makes sense? Or want me to dumb it down more? Equality means: everybody gets the same shot. Same rules, same starting line. You run the race, whoever's fastest wins. No handouts—just fair play. If you're smart, fast, or work harder, you finish first. Merit rules. That's what most folks mean by "equal opportunity." Equity means: everybody ends up at the same spot—no matter what. If you're slow, short, or got a bad leg, we give you a head start, shorter track, or carry you across. Outcome's equal, even if effort isn't. It's like saying, "We gotta make sure everyone crosses the line together," so we tweak the game for the ones who're behind. Problem? Critics say equity turns into forced equality—like taking from winners to prop up losers. Feels unfair if you're the one busting ass. Supporters say equality's a lie if life's already rigged (poor schools, bad luck, racism). So we "level" it. Bottom line: Equality = same rules, different results. Equity = same results, different rules. One's about fairness in the fight; the other's about fairness after. Pick your poison—most people hate both when they actually think about it. Do you understand now??? Sorry, I don't speak stupid... Go ask Grok to simplify this all for ya! lol