Logando

85K posts

Logando banner
Logando

Logando

@Logando_5

Husband, Father, Coach, Referee| @ATLUTD | @GatorsFB | @ManUtd | Snapchat: Logando5 |

Georgia, United States Katılım Mayıs 2009
5.1K Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
JR ⍟⃝. -
JR ⍟⃝. -@paynomind·
@Logando_5 There won't be any sanctions for a club that didn't do anything wrong
English
1
0
0
14
Bravescarly
Bravescarly@bravescarly3·
Good morning peeps, its friday! That means I give your permission to put a lil extra somsomething in your coffee if you so choose
English
5
0
22
530
Logando retweetledi
Kokou Assigbe
Kokou Assigbe@KAssigbe·
Everyone blames pay to play. But bad coaching, poor training environments,& parents who don’t understand player development stop far more kids from reaching the top. If we don’t fix those three things, changing the pay to play model alone won’t produce world class ⚽️ players.
English
2
2
9
1.3K
Logando retweetledi
Vfynn_🥷🏼 𐙚
Zlatan Ibrahimovic on to Gianni Infantino’s plan to sell stakes in the FIFA World Cup: 🗣️ “Listen to me carefully, because most of these people in suits have never understood the game and never will. They create a subsidiary. Call it FIFA Forward Enterprise. Keep majority control on paper. Sell 20% to investors who have never smelled grass. Then wave $20 million in front of every federation and pretend it’s democracy. That is not structure. That is a magic trick for lawyers. FIFA keeps the majority. FIFA keeps the board. FIFA keeps “exclusive authority” over governance, the calendar, the rules, everything that sounds important on paper. The investors get no operational role. They are only buying a slice of the cash machine. FIFA even says the investors are buying into the subsidiary, not into FIFA itself, so “nothing changes.” I have seen this movie before. Nothing changes… until the numbers start talking. Once private money owns a permanent piece of the World Cup’s revenue, the pressure never stops. More tournaments. Bigger formats. Different calendar. Different priorities. Because investors do not care about the soul of the game. They care about return. And when the federations are already bought with the $20 million “gift” and the bigger Forward payments, who exactly is going to say no? This is the same FIFA that spent decades selling the World Cup under the table. I remember the 2015 arrests. Swiss police walking into the hotel in Zurich and taking officials out in the early morning. Racketeering. Bribes. Money laundering. Hundreds of millions paid for television rights, for marketing rights, for World Cup votes. South Africa 2010. Qatar. The whole circus under Blatter. Jack Warner. Chuck Blazer singing to the Americans. Blatter and Platini banned for that $2 million “gentlemen’s agreement” that suddenly appeared when it was convenient. The Ethics Committee, the indictments, the years of “we are cleaning the house.” And now the house is cleaner, they say. Now instead of brown envelopes and secret payments, we have subsidiaries, minority non-controlling stakes, permanent capital vehicles, JPMorgan valuations, and carefully selected long-term partners. Same hunger for money. Same system of buying loyalty from the 211 associations. Only the language got more expensive. Infantino stands there and talks about democracy and opportunity. I am Zlatan. I do not need the $20 million and I do not need the speech. Most of these federations do need the money. That is exactly why this structure is dangerous. You are not offering development. You are offering a transaction: take the cash, vote yes by September, and stay quiet while pieces of the World Cup become private equity assets. Football does not belong to FIFA. FIFA belongs to football. The moment you put shareholders inside the commercial heart of the World Cup and call it progress, you have already admitted the game is for sale. They just found a prettier way to write the contract this time. I played at the highest level. I saw real power and real money. This is neither. This is bureaucracy protecting itself while selling the one thing that still belongs to the people who actually love the game. Keep your structure. Keep your valuations. Keep your minority non-controlling stakes. The World Cup was never meant to have owners in suits. It was meant to be bigger than all of you.
Vfynn_🥷🏼 𐙚 tweet mediaVfynn_🥷🏼 𐙚 tweet media
English
220
1.8K
8K
683.3K
Logando
Logando@Logando_5·
@Eng_Bran Hey man, its going to be a long summ- oh wait, it's AUGUST
English
1
0
3
107
DkB
DkB@Eng_Bran·
Can we get another ATLUTD rumor please? It’s dark times out here.
English
6
1
44
3.2K
Meagan ❤️‍🔥
Meagan ❤️‍🔥@meagsaysthings·
a 20 year old man city supporter mansplaining the premier league to me in an Instagram comment is actually hilarious lmao but I still don’t want Darwin Nunez at Atlanta United
English
3
0
5
281
Logando retweetledi
Keepitonthedeck
Keepitonthedeck@Keepitonthedeck·
Roberto De Zerbi is one of the best coaches on the planet 🧠⚽ He is crystal clear about what he wants, then turns those ideas into simple, repeatable solutions for his players. At the weekend, De Zerbi was coaching his double pivot during build up against a press led by a single centre forward. The key detail, the pivots must remain staggered. As the ball travels across to the opposite centre back, the opposition number 10 jumps to press. In doing so, the number 10 blocks the passing lane into one pivot as he moved. But the staggered positioning in the pivot positions creates the solution, the ball side pivot stays behind the first line of pressure. The opposite pivot drops at an angle to receive. A passing lane opens around the pressing player who jumps to press. The team escapes pressure and progresses through the centre. Giving players clear pictures, reference points and solutions they can recognize under pressure. You see the detail coached in training. Then you see it appear in the game. That is how effective coaching improves or aids decision making, problem solving and confidence in possession. Save this for and follow us for more. More available on our website.
English
7
50
392
44.9K
Patrick Simpson
Patrick Simpson@_PatrickSimpson·
I am inserting a petition for Florida to put the Wendy’s logo on their jerseys
English
3
0
19
2.4K
Logando retweetledi
Amelia
Amelia@amelia_tweetz·
I think I’ve reached the point where I’d rather stay in a hotel than an Airbnb. I don’t want to buy groceries. I don’t want to take out the trash. I don’t want to strip the bed before checkout. I want a cozy hotel room, breakfast waiting downstairs, housekeeping doing their thing, and zero responsibilities while I’m on vacation. When I’m traveling, I want to be a guest, not a temporary homeowner.
English
1.6K
1.2K
24.7K
1.4M
AO Atlanta
AO Atlanta@ao_atlanta·
Staying up for this U20 game while the lightning flashes outside in Atlanta is crazy ngl
English
1
0
5
480
Logando retweetledi
Ajoje⚽⚖️
Ajoje⚽⚖️@israel_ajoje·
This one is really dicey. FIFA is registered as a non-profit association under Swiss law. Its 211 member associations own it. It pays no corporate tax in Switzerland. And right now, while the ink is barely dry on the 2026 World Cup final, it is in advanced discussions to sell a minority stake in its commercial operations to private investors, with JP Morgan acting as financial adviser and Thrive Capital, whose chief executive is Josh Kushner, expected to lead the investor group. UEFA is responding. And I see reason with them. Their statement called it a crossing of a line and said the soul and governance of football are not assets to trade. Let me explain what is actually happening here and why both positions are legally and commercially coherent at the same time. The legal vehicle at the centre of this is called FIFA Forward Enterprise, or FFE. It is a FIFA-owned company that would consolidate all of FIFA's commercial rights, broadcasting, sponsorship, ticketing, licensing, and the operational delivery of FIFA tournaments, into a single entity. Based on how things are proposed, FIFA would retain majority control and exclusive authority over governance, competitions, the match calendar, and all regulatory and sporting decisions. Private investors would then hold a minority, non-controlling stake in the subsidiary, not in FIFA itself. FIFA says the proposal could deliver more than $10 billion in football development funding over the next four years. Now here is the legal position. Under Swiss association law, FIFA has broad autonomy over how it manages and commercialises its assets, provided it pursues its statutory purpose of promoting football and follows its internal decision-making rules. Creating a commercial subsidiary and selling minority stakes in it to private investors is not categorically prohibited under any applicable law. FIFA already commercialises its rights aggressively through sponsorships, media deals, and licensing arrangements worth billions of dollars per cycle. Placing some of that commercial activity into a valued vehicle and inviting outside capital is structurally an extension of what FIFA already does, not a departure from it. The proposal requires approval from the FIFA Council and the 211 member associations. That approval process is where the real legal constraints sit, not in Swiss corporate law. What UEFA is objecting to is not the legality of the structure. They are objecting to the incentive architecture it creates once private capital is inside the tent. And again, that objection deserves to be taken seriously. Even with formal majority control retained, private investors seeking returns will create ongoing pressure. They will request more matches, an expanded calendar. They will make decisions that prioritise revenue over player welfare or competitive balance. Of course that pressure will not arrive through a boardroom vote. It arrives gradually, through the logic of what a return on investment requires. FIFA can retain exclusive authority over sporting decisions and still find that sporting decisions are shaped by the financial expectations of its commercial partners. Those are not mutually exclusive outcomes. The legal permissibility of this structure is high if internal approvals are obtained. The binding constraints are member consent, political capital, and the risk that private capital incentives gradually reshape priorities even under retained formal control. Football has watched that process play out at club level for thirty years. The question being asked right now, with genuine urgency, is whether the same dynamic should be allowed inside the institution that governs the game itself. My name is Ajoje. I am a FIFA Licensed Agent and International Sports Lawyer. I write on the Law and Business of Football, a lot. Repost and Follow if you want to read more posts like this.
Sky Sports News@SkySportsNews

BREAKING: UEFA have hit out at FIFA's reported plans to sell stakes in the World Cup to private investors 🚨

English
140
1.7K
8K
1.5M
James
James@atlutdjames·
Remember the worst tweet of all time
James tweet media
English
14
31
1.4K
55.4K