Facts Don’t Care About You’re Feelings

@RedpillDrifter Why do individuals who identify as "conspiracy truth seekers" often share common traits such as a history of academic struggles and financial instability, yet maintain a strong belief that they possess unique insights into hidden truths?

@Broth3rz1 ‘Name calling’ bahahahah. Aww did I hurt your feelings from giving you facts over your nonsense. What a shame. Someone else trying to speak the word of God even though it says in the Bible not to!! Fool. Classic dumb American. I think you’re done.

@Longtrainjimmy I've rebutted everything you've said, including your last post already. You've undermined yourself many times with name calling, strawmen, sarcasm, accusations of AI because I know my facts, then asked for a proper conversation, then cycled back to refuted claims. You're done.

@SheepDogLegend Bahahahahahahahh wtf is this. Looks like a 10 year old thought of it babahahahahahahahabhahahah

If you understood vision, you’d know the earth is flat.

@Broth3rz1 I’m not saying more data is less convincing. I’m saying your data is less convincing. Big difference. You can have 24,000 manuscripts saying a bloke turned water into wine. I need one that wasn’t written by believers years later. That’s not ‘more evidence’.

@Longtrainjimmy Name calling and sarcasm throughout isn't a proper conversation. I know the Bible stats by heart, because I know the evidence and my argument. Images of text to bypass the limit on X is common, better, more work. At this point you're arguing that more data is less convincing.

@Broth3rz1 Right. So my joke felt like AI but your 24,000 manuscripts don’t? I’d rather have a proper conversation whether it is longer or not. Than just a post images . Now go tweet your evidence in an image again. That’ll convince ‘em

@Longtrainjimmy Because I need to use an image to get past the character limit on X doesn't mean my post was AI. Your last line about Christmas is pure AI though... I never said anything about it. You didn't refute anything and even if you did, you undermined it all because of naming calling.

@AdonaiOnGaia Only for dumb people it makes sense. So congratulations, you just figured out your a massive retard.

Literally all things only make sense on a flat earth.

@Broth3rz1 No point even talking to you, you’re just using AI cause you’re a dumb fuck.

@Broth3rz1 24,000 manuscripts? Lovely. There are millions of copies of Harry Potter doesn’t make Hogwarts real. Quantity isn’t quality, mate. And ‘other categories’? You mean geography and Roman records that mention a bloke called Jesus, not one who did magic tricks.

@Longtrainjimmy It's not just manuscript evidence, there are other categories of evidence. You then add it all in collectively to build a case. Even so, if it were manuscript only, those 24,000 manuscripts dwarf anything opposing it.

@Broth3rz1 People have died believing Elvis is still alive. Doesn’t make ‘Suspicious Minds’ a miracle. Dying for a lie just means you were committed, not correct. Add all the ‘evidence’ you want still starts with a virgin birth. That’s not a historical document, that’s a Christmas card

@Longtrainjimmy Of course people die for wrong beliefs, generally they do not though. This is why also said the second part that I did. However, it does add validity, then you apply any other evidence to that to make it more of a case.

@Broth3rz1 People die for wrong beliefs all the time, mate. Heaven’s Gate, Jonestown, that bloke who thought his toaster spoke to him. Dying for something doesn’t make it true just means you really, really believed it. Which is sweet, but not evidence.

@Longtrainjimmy Depends. Those 50 'friends' willing to be murdered in horrific ways for this claim? Like everything else, it would be evidence based, if there is more then one type (and great amount) of evidence, verified, then it would make sense to believe it happened. Would be wrong not to.

@Broth3rz1 Manuscripts say he walked on water. Roman records? Funny how none mention a zombie uprising. Same type of evidence? Same type of fairy tale, mate.

@Longtrainjimmy Christ has the same standard type of evidence as others, and more of it, as I said. But I never said He doesn't have more than the standard, you did. Because He actually does; manuscripts, archaeology, roman legal records, geographic, etc, etc.

@Broth3rz1 Extraordinary claims don’t need more ordinary evidence. They need a different kind. You don’t prove magic with more hearsay. You prove it with magic. And you’ve got none.

@Longtrainjimmy The standard, as I mentioned, was on the type, not the amount. However, as I also mentioned, we do have a greater amount of evidence for Christ because He is a greater claim, but again, it's just disregarded on type and amount, unlike the others.

@plain_see @maximumpain333 @yahweh83enigma Maybe try zooming out.

@maximumpain333 @yahweh83enigma The world before the brainwashing began. Where unproven theories weren’t taught as if they were facts.

1892 FLAT EARTH MAPS

@Broth3rz1 Right. Except no one’s claiming Caesar turned water into wine or came back from the dead. That’s not ‘the same standard,’ mate that’s a higher bar. You’re not being disregarded. You’re just not being believed.

@Longtrainjimmy Premise is wrong again. We provide the same type of evidence used to verify every other historical figure like Caesar, Socrates, Alexander the Great, etc., whose existence no one questions, and far more of it for Christ. Yet that same standard is simply disregarded.

@Broth3rz1 @freespeech1015 @kaizen000000000

@Longtrainjimmy @freespeech1015 @kaizen000000000 I said that because I was responding to someone who said it first. Anyways, straw man. Don't understand the basics.

Her condescending laughing and smirking was textbook passive aggressive.

@Broth3rz1 @freespeech1015 @kaizen000000000 “ I’m not stuck in sick but arguments” what are you 10 years old bahahahahah. Religious folk are always so so lost. Kind of explains why they believe in a magic man in the sky.

@freespeech1015 @kaizen000000000 I'm not stuck in circular arguments. That's just how evolutionist 'debate'. Most of them have to redefine terms, strawman you, etc. They use tactics, not logic or facts, while trying to rabbit hole everything to defend their position which turns into the circular argument.

Showed You Earth is Flat #flatearth

@BrockRiddickIFB YES, if you can’t understand that, makes perfect sense why you don’t understand complex physics.

@FytKid @Keetb999k I’m guessing you’re a massive narcissist as well bahahah.

@Longtrainjimmy @Keetb999k Ok... Take every flight of over 12 hours and overlay them over a globe. Then take the same flights overlay them on this map. Which looks like it should most?