Louis Slesin

@colinleggphoto @rfsafe @blogBRHP @FrontPubHealth @longwoodu Seven years later I'm still waiting. The studies were never done. That was the plan all along. It was always about sabotaging public health. Now @FrontPubHealth and @blogBRHP think this is the guy who should judge what gets published in a research journal. microwavenews.com/news-center/ca…

@rfsafe @LouisSlesin @blogBRHP @FrontPubHealth @longwoodu “As we close out the business of the WTR, I would like to openly ask for your help in distributing the summary findings we have complied of our work.” Did this happen?

By Dariusz Leszczynski @blogBRHP, who serves as chief editor of Radiation & Health Section @FrontPubHealth. Assoc editor George Carlo ran peer review. GC said to be @longwoodu but he’s not on its website. GC is a sports performance coach. #PredatoryJournal frontiersin.org/journals/publi…

@blogBRHP @FrontPubHealth @longwoodu For an “unknown reason” ! Why would someone at your own journal second guess you, the editor in charge? Whose unseen hand is at work favoring someone with so few qualifications. That, Dariusz, should give you pause.

@blogBRHP @FrontPubHealth @longwoodu No single person has done more to sabotage #RF research in the U.S. than Carlo. Why would you want to defend him?

@blogBRHP @FrontPubHealth @longwoodu @MicrowaveNews Watch the video, Dariusz!

@blogBRHP @FrontPubHealth @longwoodu Dariusz is now defending Carlo. 😂 georgecarlo.com

@blogBRHP @FrontPubHealth @longwoodu Dariusz is right that I am no fan of George Carlo. The reasons are well documented in the pages @MicrowaveNews. Just watch this video 👇 of him trying to sell snake oil to protect against #RF radiation and decide for yourself. youtube.com/watch?v=5oA98P…

@hippocapensis @KFosterUPenn @MicrowaveNews @NIH @UW The results were controversial (no surprise), especially for the sponsor, the USAF, which had designed the study to try to show no effect. It took *8 years* for them to appear in a journal. Here’s what I wrote at the time 👇 (note: $5MM then, ~$20MM now). microwavenews.com/sites/default/…

@LouisSlesin @KFosterUPenn @MicrowaveNews @NIH @UW This first cancer study, where was it published? Anybody have the reference? In the MW article it says the study was still under review when MW wrote about it.

“The ageing state of the cell or body plays a role in determining the biological or health effects of EMF exposure, but the exact effect depends on the specific conditions, and further investigation of the underlying mechanism is needed.” From China 🇨🇳. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

@KFosterUPenn @MicrowaveNews Foster, like all industry consultants, can question a research finding. But readers shouldn’t forget @NIH concluded there was “clear evidence” of a cancer risk. Many others have found cancer too. Indeed, the very first US long-term #RF exposure study @UW saw more cancer in 1984.

@LouisSlesin @MicrowaveNews Only if you selectively examine subsets of complex datasets (NTP) without taking multiple comparison issues into account.

@KFosterUPenn @MicrowaveNews Another consistent finding is that RF-exposed rats develop more cancer.

@MicrowaveNews One fairly consistent finding of whole animal (rat) RF exposure studies is that the exposed animals live *longer* than unexposed controls, undoubtedly related to thermally induced changes in metabolic rate.

The authors desperately need editorial help. Not only are the conclusions hard to grasp, but their summary slide 👇 posted by the journal has a boo boo. This is Part II ! As for the science, it looks as contentious as Part I, published last summer. See: microwavenews.com/news-center/ol…

Yes, No, Yes, No. Now maybe Yes. miamiherald.com/news/nation-wo…

I bet @FullFact is worried that that @Meta will kill its fact checking program in the UK too. Here again, FF fails to disclose its obvious conflict of interest.

In 2021-2023, the bulk of @FullFact’s funding came from Meta (Facebook) & Alphabet (Google). Each gave a total of ~$1.5 million. Could this explain why FF distorts key facts about health effects of #RF radiation? FF is either woefully uninformed or simply protecting its sponsors.

A few days ago it was seed oils, today maybe it’s alcohol. Except for a very few, no one wants to look at what might happen when you carry a cell phone in your trouser pocket. It’s constantly beaming RF radiation into the colon. #RF causes cancer, says NIH microwavenews.com/news-center/ne…

“They are very, very health conscious and then they come into your clinic and they’re 33 and they’ve got stage-four colon cancer,” said Dr. Marwan Fakih, a GI oncologist at City of Hope in CA. “There’s no question we’re missing something.” #phoneinpocket? wsj.com/health/healthc…

Iraq 🇮🇶 is doing more #RF health research than the USA 🇺🇸 ! ejmanager.com/mnstemps/100/1…

An example of misdirection from usually reliable @axios, which picked it up uncritically from @sciam. axios.com/2024/12/28/see… There are no data linking seed oils to rising incidence of #EOCRC. There is for cell phones. #RF can cause cancer! #phoneinpocket microwavenews.com/news-center/ne…