Francis Loveday

469 posts

Francis Loveday banner
Francis Loveday

Francis Loveday

@LovedayWrites

Author of ‘Our Two Democracies’

London, England Katılım Haziran 2026
159 Takip Edilen33 Takipçiler
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
No, the only thing that’s stopping you buying a house is that there are currently 7 working adults paying rent to the landlord owning it. This isn’t a stab at landlords. It’s that we’re in a situation that 7 adults have to live in the same house. There should be a ‘room in a shared house with 7 other professionals’ product on the market that normal people are willing to buy. But there is. And 7 people buy it out of 50+ applicants. You want that house? You need to be able to afford 7x more than each of those individual adults can afford. It’s that simple. If there was a house nobody needed, it’d be cheap as chips. #overcrowdedbritain
English
0
0
0
6
Callum Lyon
Callum Lyon@CallumLyon·
According to some people, the only thing stopping you from buying a house is that £3 coffee. Not the £1,200 rent. Not wages that barely cover the bills. Not house prices rising faster than you can save. Nope. It's definitely the occasional latte that's been ruining your financial future all along.
English
6
12
69
2.4K
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
And yet today, with the highest tax burden and massive government debt, it is apparently Thatcher who is to blame? Nothing about today’s Britain would have passed her sniff test.
Brunte 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧@Brunte84

Since you mentioned Lady Thatcher, @andyburnham, here's a reminder of what she achieved 👇🏼 •⁠ ⁠Top rate of income tax: 83% → 40% •⁠ ⁠Basic rate: 33% → 25% •⁠ ⁠Inflation: 21.9% peak (1980) → 2.4% (1986) •⁠ ⁠Days lost to strikes: 29.5 million (1979) → 1.9 million (1990) •⁠ ⁠Real take-home pay for the average earner: up by a third •⁠ ⁠Right to Buy: over a million council tenants became homeowners •⁠ ⁠Home ownership: 55% → 67% •⁠ ⁠Individual shareholders: 3 million → 11 million — one in four adults •⁠ ⁠Foreign holidays: roughly doubled •⁠ ⁠Homes with a telephone: two-thirds → nearly nine in ten •⁠ ⁠Pensioners' average incomes: up around 30% in real terms •⁠ ⁠Infant mortality: down almost 40% •⁠ ⁠Real GDP: up by almost a third •⁠ ⁠GDP per head outgrew France, Germany and Italy in the 1980s •⁠ ⁠Manufacturing productivity: slowest growth in the G7 in the 1970s → fastest in the 1980s •⁠ ⁠Self-employed: 1.9 million → 3.5 million •⁠ ⁠Nissan to Sunderland, Toyota to Derby, Honda to Swindon •⁠ ⁠Britain became a net oil exporter •⁠ ⁠London restored as the world's financial capital in 1986 •⁠ ⁠Budget surpluses three years running — Britain repaid debt, 1987–90 •⁠ ⁠National debt: 47% of GDP → 28% •⁠ ⁠State spending: ~45% of GDP → ~39% •⁠ ⁠The civil service: 732,000 → 565,000 •⁠ ⁠Corporation tax: 52% → 35%; the small firms' rate: 42% → 25% •⁠ ⁠Personal tax allowances: up more than 25% in real terms •⁠ ⁠Higher rates of income tax: nine → one •⁠ ⁠Death duties: fourteen rates → one •⁠ ⁠Exchange controls scrapped after 40 years •⁠ ⁠40+ nationalised businesses privatised — 600,000 employees moved to the private sector •⁠ ⁠The 33 big state industries: took ~£500m from taxpayers in 1980 → paid £8.4bn to the Exchequer by 1987 •⁠ ⁠British Steel: world-record loss-maker (1980/81) → £733m profit (1989/90) •⁠ ⁠BT, 1984: the largest share offer the world had ever seen •⁠ ⁠"Tell Sid" broke the record again in 1986 •⁠ ⁠British Airways: nationalised loss-maker → profitable, private, "the world's favourite airline" •⁠ ⁠The Channel Tunnel: launched — entirely privately financed •⁠ ⁠The Falklands liberated in 74 days •⁠ ⁠Backed Gorbachev early, stood with Reagan, and won the Cold War •⁠ ⁠Three consecutive election victories and the longest-serving PM of the twentieth century ✌🏼🇬🇧

English
0
0
0
7
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
Future full state pensions will be dependent on: 1. Financial contributions 2. A minimum of two children
English
0
0
0
1
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
@CutMyTaxUK Maxed out tax burden. Maxed out debt burden. The country is in a mess. And the only answers seem to be yet more government tax and spend! Is this really the best leadership we’ve got?
English
0
0
7
92
Cut My Tax
Cut My Tax@CutMyTaxUK·
Is it "fair" that the top 10% of earners pay 60% of all income tax? Would it be "fairer" if the communal burden was shared more broadly? Andy Burnham said he “might be having to ask for a little more." Would that be "fair"?
Cut My Tax tweet media
English
38
38
208
4.2K
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
@ConcernedofBri1 @GoodwinMJ Most people don’t want to go. But they have limits. And they are being increasingly tested. I attended another leaving drinks on Thursday for a colleague heading to Singapore.
English
1
0
1
15
Matt Goodwin
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ·
The top 10 per cent of earners in the UK pay nearly 60 per cent of ALL income tax receipts. Now imagine what would happen if they decided to leave the UK altogether …. —brand new figures from Revenue & Customs
English
147
373
1.9K
48.9K
Concerned of Bristol
Concerned of Bristol@ConcernedofBri1·
@GoodwinMJ As their jobs became vacant, new people would take on the economic opportunities that just became available, and earn their salaries. Net effect? Nil. 🤡
English
5
0
9
217
That discord guy
That discord guy@DaDiscordDev5a·
Yeah but top earners start at what 50k ??? Most top earners could not afford to leave 🤔 Who are we saying as leaving here? Billion airs and million airs? Because that's not top earners. We only have 3 tax bands ffs 🙄 We need bands for 20k 100k 200k 300k 400k 500k Not 13k 40k 100k Or what ever we have now. People gaslight so hard on tax
English
1
0
2
413
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
@TaxJusticeUK @andyburnham How the #1 issue in politics ISN’T the size of government… I will never understand. We’re instead getting more of what’s hurting us.
English
1
0
3
437
Tax Justice UK
Tax Justice UK@TaxJusticeUK·
Be audacious @andyburnham! REMEMBER: 75% of the UK public back a Wealth Tax (& 75% of UK millionaires do too!) The howlers might be loud (because they own newspapers and social media platforms), but in reality they are a tiny, greedy minority protecting their stash.
English
218
102
242
62.2K
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
It’s not just the money - we have money. It’s not just investment - we have investment. It’s not just jobs - we can make more jobs…. It’s that we’re losing a competent business leader, someone who CREATES WEALTH. And the left don’t care because they think they add no value. Classic Dunning Kruger effect.
Francis Loveday tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
The current £60k limit is ridiculous when combined with the taper. By the time you can afford to contribute, you’re not allowed to. I approve limiting the total allowance, while slashing all tapers and cliff edges - which create viciously unfair, punitive and perverse outcomes. I’m also a fan of slashing welfare and government budgets. We need a campaign to limit the state to 26% of the economy.
English
0
0
4
681
JW 🇬🇧
JW 🇬🇧@FinanceTiger·
🚨 If ‘capping Pension Tax Relief’ at 20% becomes law, my advice would be to not bother with pensions at all! Instead, enjoy life to its fullest and max out your ISA!
JW 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
36
12
214
42.5K
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
Your government SPENDS $7 TRILLION EVERY YEAR - many multiples of the lifetime wealth (not spending) of the names you mention… and still can’t fix it. Maybe money isn’t the problem. The billionaires are helping the world in the ways they choose and they are the best at it. Maybe it’s time for other people to take off the rose tinted glasses and look in the mirror for once.
English
1
0
20
353
Documenting Saylor
Documenting Saylor@saylordocs·
I genuinely don't understand people like Bezos and Musk. If I had billions of dollars, I would just start fixing everything. Homeless veterans sleeping on the streets? Not on my watch. Hungry children going to bed with empty stomachs? Hell no. They could be making life better but instead choose to build spaceships and data centers to pump stocks and destroy the planet
English
3.2K
63
647
226.2K
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
@NJM71 They are not benefits. They are Societal Withdrawals. If we have no money for defence, you bet we should be concerned about how the benefits bill is spent.
English
0
0
0
760
Nic Millar
Nic Millar@NJM71·
Wow. Some people on here are becoming slightly obsessed with what people spend their benefits on. Shouldn't be going on holiday, absolutely no new phone or TV - no nice things at all, period. A joyless existence on bread & water seems to be the most benefit claimants deserve 🫪
English
670
44
518
208.3K
Vernsy
Vernsy@Vernsy117875·
@NJM71 When are people going to get it into their thick heads that trying to reduce benefits, civil service wages and pensions would be disastrous to the economy. Civil servants spend millions in private businesses? Fighting amongst ourselves is what the billionaires want.
English
1
0
1
1.7K
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
@Rob879048596559 @NJM71 I don’t think anybody with a heart is against supporting fellow citizens who NEED help or fall on hard times. You are right that the waste, fraud and abuse is what takes up all the tax base, prevents the country helping people truly in need and breaks the social contract.
English
0
0
0
17
Rob
Rob@Rob879048596559·
I've been on benefits for 4 years, I haven't been on holiday in 8 years and my wife still works. For some people a holiday is a caravan in a field not a week in Tenareefy !! Fraudsters have been robbing the system since the early 80s. I don't care if people have a holiday, I would however like to know how they manage too. Ban all foreigners legal and illegal from claiming. Look into the rise of claimants that have anxiety, adhd and many other made up illnesses. Only claimants that have put in 10 years plus of taxes.
English
1
0
1
725
Francis Loveday
Francis Loveday@LovedayWrites·
1 in 5 working aged people are on benefits. 25% of houses are tax payer funded. So either one in five people are properly disabled (doubtful), or the government is unnecessarily giving my money to them, instead of letting me use it to give my children a better life. That’s the difference. It goes to them and their kids, or it goes to my children. Reality: the government wins votes by offering people other peoples money.
English
0
0
2
78
Liza
Liza@elizabeth__db·
@de_varse @NJM71 I’m ONE THOUSAND PER CENT not one of those people, but it is interesting because what is the relevance of my being a ‘net’ contributor? Why ask the question? Does my being so make my position more or less acceptable? Why must I be net?
English
6
0
25
5.8K