Lucija Batinovic

I’ve decided to start a blog! Primarily to practice writing and coding, but the content might be useful to others, so I’m sharing here. I’m open to feedback/suggestions if anyone’s interested! (I’ll just report any negative comments 🥰) elucidatescience.netlify.app

A short primer on #reproducibility by our team is now out at @Curr_Protocols, intended for researchers who want to get into some good repro practices. Covers transparent reporting of methods, data sharing, and much more! Read at: doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.7…

I've created a shiny app to browse through all (now 3400) open science blog posts. There is a 'happening today' button. Among others, Rolf Zwaan in 2020 on sequential analyses rolfzwaan.blogspot.com/2020/07/how-we…

For anyone who’s published systematic reviews, how often did you succeed in getting unpublished data by reaching out to authors? I don’t mean additional/IP data from published papers, but new data or data they could not get published.

I am stepping in as chair of IGDORE Sweden. Looking forward to taking IGDORE Sweden into the future together with affiliates and staff! My deepest thanks to outgoing chair Rebecca Willén for all she has done in founding the organization and building it to where it is today.

Does anyone know of any opportunities (research, industry, academia, etc.) for a recent college grad with a B.S. in Neuroscience (3.8 GPA - graduated two years early) and lots of research experience (western blotting, immunohistochemistry, cell culture, flow cytometry, ELISAs)?

@Luce10101 Please don’t let it be problem behavior + intelligence. Please no

@MatthewBJane Right? 😂😂

Total??

I’m never leaving this place

Nathan getting news outlets to report more on the plane accidents just to lay the grounds for the second season doesn’t even sound farfetched

I had no idea Hollywood is a representative sample of the general population

@MatthewBJane nature.com/articles/s4156…

Added context to this meta-meta-analysis: 1) ~80-90% of meta-analyses are of CRITICALLY low quality. 2) <5% of meta-analyses are of high quality. 3) Significant differences in the effects between high and low quality study effect sizes. Yet, the effects that are reported in the abstract pool over all meta-analyses. 4) Massive publication bias (see funnel plots below) 5) The meta-analysis is conducted on the pooled effect sizes from each meta-analysis. This leads to a ton of problems (uninterpretable heterogeneity, treating meta-analyses as independent, etc.). Studies should be extracted from each meta-analysis and then the analyst should conduct a meta-analysis on all of the individual studies. Error report #5 coming soon...

For people who published/conducted Stage 2 registered reports, have you ever had issues that required significant deviations from the Stage 1 and how have you handled this? Are there any instances where this did not lead to rejection?

After @UniLeidenNews proactively caved to gov threats by shutting down our international psych BA program, our newsletter now includes this blog calling for defending academic freedom in...the US. ‘Don’t just give in; defend academic freedom’. You do see the irony, right?

The meta-analysis on the relationship between Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al. (2025) that RFK Jr. has cited contains major methodological flaws and data integrity issues that we describe in the following pre-print (submitted to meta-psychology): osf.io/preprints/osf/…

@EmmyAnnaLu I think apple finder is driving it up for some reason, but it can’t be anything legitimate. I’m just refusing to update my phone so issues are arising😂

@Luce10101 What Apps? Anki?

Unbeatable

This inspired white lotus s3

Can’t make this up

It's absolutely amazing the a PCIRR Stage 2 community endorsed manuscript automatically is accepted in a journal like Royal Society Open Science with no additional peer review needed. Go PCIRR friendly journals! rr.peercommunityin.org/about/pci_rr_f… Why aren't there more journals joining?