
LukeRocksALot
37 posts



People keep saying “citizen” only means a corporation or legal fiction while ignoring what federal law actually says.
Let’s deal with the statutes.
First, Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute defines a “natural person” as a living human being and distinguishes natural persons from artificial entities such as corporations and partnerships.
Then Congress goes even further in federal law.
1 U.S.C. § 8 states that in determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, the words:
* “person”
* “human being”
* “child”
* and “individual”
include every born alive infant member of the species homo sapiens.
So Congress itself recognizes:
* human beings,
* individuals,
* and persons
within statutory law.
Now go to 22 U.S.C. § 1641.
Congress defines “person” to include:
* a natural person,
* partnership,
* association,
* corporation,
* or body politic.
Then Congress separately defines “National of the United States” as:
“(A) a natural person who is a citizen of the United States, or who owes permanent allegiance to the United States…”
Read that carefully.
Congress explicitly connected:
* Natural Person
* Citizen of the United States
* and National of the United States
within federal statutory law.
Then 46 U.S.C. § 104 states:
“In this title, the term ‘citizen of the United States’, when used in reference to a natural person, means an individual who is a national of the United States as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act…”
Again, Congress expressly distinguishes natural persons from artificial entities.
So yes, corporations can sometimes be treated as citizens for limited legal purposes.
But that does NOT mean all citizens are corporations or legal fictions.
That claim falls apart once you actually read the statutes.
The law recognizes:
* artificial entities,
AND
* natural persons.
A corporation is artificial.
A living human being is a natural person.
And Congress itself expressly states that natural persons can be citizens and nationals of the United States.
That is federal law — not internet mythology.
Want to learn more meet me at the conference check comments below.

English

Bruh this is actually insane 😂 some 80 year old posh geezer in a fancy dress costume and a borrowed crown gets wheeled out to read a script written by the same MPs who treat us like mugs.
In 2026 Britain is still blowing millions of our taxes on this medieval larping session as if it’s not a total waste of cash. Absolute clown show, scrap the lot then. #AbolishTheMonarchy
English

@GermanicFren 26 USC 7701 Definitions (h).
The certificate of title is false.
Two classes of citizens!


English

@litecoin Slow down people, Idon't see a release on github.
English

Litecoin Core v0.21.5.4 released! All users are advised to upgrade. This release contains important security updates.
blog.litecoin.org/litecoin-core-…
English

@KiwiTuckerNE @Grayscale There will be something that happens ... a complete shock in understanding given these pairs and other pairs.

English

Dear @Grayscale
I salute 🫡 your legal team.
This was an excellent SEC filing and write up on 4/6/2026.
Thank you
The Litecoin Holders.



English


@Tcastolo_ @DrChrisCombs truth is.... only debtors/credit card holders/mort-gage slaves (which literally means death pledge french to english) believe in spinning ball.
Go back to the wagie cage tomorrow :)
English

@MASTERBTCLTC Cheers, master.
Not many people understand exactly what Litecoin is.
HODL.
English

@petpau @DMinimilian Mweb>core>unplug computer >cold storage
Français

@DMinimilian If someone can create an MWEB Cold wallet, we go straight to that number this year.
English

@Litecoiner Better than being poor trying to explain the end of proof of work currencies...
English

@worldranking_ On April fools day too.
Easily tricked fools...
English

@LukeRocksALot wtf does XRP 2017 breakout have to do with anything?? LOL
English


























