Lvl collection🧊

GM ☕ ION Day 101 of posting ICE 🧊 Until it reach $1 🚀 #HTX #Metamask $0,00483 2. Airdrop when ICE hit $0,01🚀 10 000 ICE for 10 winner Each 1 000 ICE 🔥Find my posts Day 1-100🔥 - Rt & Like all - Drop $ICE If you finished all! Drop ICE adress here👇🏻 #ION #IceOpenNetwork

✨ Some of you may think we went silent because we stopped working on ION. We didn’t. As we said weeks ago, we are still here, still building, and still fighting to put the project back on the right path. Yes, the team is smaller now. But I still believe this team is capable of doing something powerful once the work we’ve been doing is ready to be shown publicly. In the past, you were used to weekly bulletins, timelines, updates, and constant transparency. That changes now. We will no longer share every step, every internal milestone, or every expected timeline before things are ready. We learned the hard way that too much transparency can sometimes create more damage than trust, especially when technical delays happen and people turn unfinished work into FUD. This period may look difficult from the outside, but I believe it will make the community stronger. It will separate the noise from the believers, the bad mouths from the builders, and the short-term panic from the long-term vision. Our focus now is simple: build products that generate real revenue, so we never end up in this position again. Big changes are coming. The website will be updated. The whitepaper will be updated. And when the time is right, the new direction will be clear. One lesson I learned personally: never brag before the product is ready. If what we are building was easy, everyone would have done it already. Right now, words will not convince everyone. And that is fine. Because if our plan works and we execute it properly, the results will speak louder than any post. We are not building only for crypto users. We are building something that can scale beyond crypto, cheaper, faster, and with real utility. Silence does not mean surrender. It means focus. Zeus

🧑‍💻 We are still here. We are still building. And we are not done yet.

@tatebtcx0 🫡🔥🔥🔥

I'm bullish on #bitcoin! I will give 2 $BTC to two person who likes this tweet.

🧑‍💻

🚨 We want to address a security incident that has recently come to our attention and provide full clarity to the community. On April 15, one individual gained unauthorized access to an identity database server and illegally exported data. We have since received credible information, including direct evidence shared by a well-known member of the community, confirming that parts of this data were further distributed to third parties. The individuals involved were not directly employed by Ice Labs. As mentioned in the past, Ice Labs worked with a third-party service provider that handled part of the operational side of the project, including coordination of development, design, product, and PR resources. The individuals responsible for this incident were part of that service provider’s team. We have identified the individuals involved, and four former collaborators acted together in breaching their contractual confidentiality obligations and illegally sharing sensitive data. We have already initiated formal proceedings, including a complaint filed with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and a criminal complaint with law enforcement authorities, to ensure that all responsible parties are held fully accountable. It is important to clearly state what this incident does and does not impact. User funds are safe. At no point were private keys, access credentials, or any information that could allow unauthorized access to user funds compromised. The affected data includes identity key names, associated public keys, email addresses, and phone numbers used for 2FA. As a precaution, we strongly recommend that all users update their 2FA settings, including both email and phone-based authentication methods. We are treating this matter with the highest level of seriousness and will pursue it to the fullest extent of the law. As we have done before, including successfully defending our name in legal proceedings against Intercontinental Exchange in the United States, we will take all necessary steps to ensure that those responsible are held accountable. At the same time, this situation does not impact the continuation of the project. Development, product rollout, and ecosystem expansion continue without interruption. Our focus remains on building, delivering, and growing the Ice Open Network ecosystem. As an additional measure, tomorrow we will run a migration on Online+ to further increase the security level. During this process, the platform may be temporarily unavailable or experience loading issues. We will continue to provide updates as the situation progresses.

A lot of people are asking for the SealSend mobile APK. We’re working on it. Now an honest question: If we made the full mobile app available for just $1/year subscription, would you pay for it? I’m genuinely trying to understand who really needs this technology and who would actually use it. And before anyone says it: if someone truly doesn’t have $1, that’s not an issue, we’d give it for free. I’d appreciate honest answers.

📢 We said this week, and just 1 hour later, SealSend v3.0 is published. The new version is now live and remains free for the SealSend community. Check the Chrome Web Store to see when it becomes available for you. chromewebstore.google.com/detail/pcbdjfb… Test it, and if you think a real feature is missing, leave a comment with a good suggestion. We’re ready to improve it further. 🚀

📢 SealSend Update This week, we will release a new update for the SealSend extension. We have also decided to keep the extension free for everyone to use, with no staking, no paid access, and no barriers. Regarding the SealSend token distribution, we want to be fully transparent: there are no plans at this moment. The reason is simple. SealSend does not currently have the budget required for market making or to support a token launch in a responsible way. To be clear, SealSend has never earned anything from this project. The entire development has been funded directly by the company. Given the current market conditions, we also do not see a strong reason to move forward with a token at this stage. Our main focus now is on the product itself: keeping the extension free and accessible completing the mobile application releasing it first as a free APK that anyone can download, install, and use Later, if we find the right path to monetize the technology, for example by offering it as a service to businesses - then we can revisit the token, its utility, and any potential distribution. If the community has constructive ideas, we’re happy to hear them. But please understand: constant spam in the comments does not help. We appreciate everyone who is part of this community, but we also need to be realistic, we are building a product, not running a charity. Thank you to everyone who continues to support SealSend for what it is: real technology, real utility, and real privacy.

@ice_z3us Thats it😎🔥🔥🔥 build and grow! I am still here🧊💎✊🏻

👉 A personal note on the noise, the lies, and why I’m still building Lately, I’ve received a lot of hate, FUD, and even death threats from certain people in the community. Some of those threats have already been reported to the authorities. Despite all of that, I’m still here. I’m still building. And I’m still ignoring the noise. What I’m seeing lately is not criticism grounded in facts. It’s conspiracy theories, hallucinations, and people repeating accusations they never took the time to verify for themselves. So let’s address a few of them directly. 1) “You rugged the community” This claim falls apart the moment anyone looks at the public history of our work. We started building this project at the beginning of January 2022. We made the code public in March 2023. That is easily verifiable on GitHub across all repositories related to Phase One. For example, when we made the mobile app repository public, it already contained 229,000 lines of code written by our team during that period: github.com/ice-blockchain… Since then, our team has written millions of lines of code across the broader codebase over the past four years. So let me ask a simple question: does it make any sense that a team would invest years of work, millions in cost, build publicly, show its faces, attend conferences, go live on streams, and continue shipping for years — only to “rug” at the lowest point? If the goal had ever been to scam people, there were far easier moments to disappear. We did not disappear. We kept building. That matters. The work was real. The cost was real. The commitment was real. And it has all been visible for anyone willing to look. What is not serious is hiding behind anonymous accounts, refusing to verify public information, and then throwing around the word “scam” as if that replaces evidence. 2) “You changed from ICE to ION so you could mint tokens and dump on the community” This is another false narrative pushed by people who either do not understand how bridge contracts work, or do not care to understand. We did not migrate from ICE to ION because of some secret plan to mint coins and scam users. We were sued by Intercontinental Exchange over trademark infringement related to ICE. That legal battle went on for years. We won in the US, and then the fight continued in the EU. Based on legal advice, we changed the ticker from ICE to ION. That is why the migration happened. Reference: fxnewsgroup.com/forex-news/exc… Now let’s address the bridge contract allegation clearly. The fact that the ION BSC bridge contract contains mint functionality does not mean we can mint unlimited tokens whenever we want. That is how bridged assets work. The ION bridge between Ice Open Network and BSC follows a lock-and-mint / burn-and-unlock model: When a user bridges ION from Ice Open Network to BSC, the original ION is locked on the Ice Open Network side. Then the corresponding bridged amount is minted on BSC. When a user bridges back from BSC to Ice Open Network, the bridged ION on BSC is burned. The original ION is then unlocked on Ice Open Network. So yes, the BSC contract has mint functionality. It has to. That is part of bridge logic. It does not mean the team can arbitrarily create supply out of thin air. This is visible in the verified contract code on BscScan, where minting is part of the bridge mechanism involving validation logic and functions such as voteForMinting, not a simple “owner prints tokens” button: #code" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">bscscan.com/token/0xE1ab61… The total supply remains 21B ION. Bridging does not create extra supply. It mirrors already locked tokens across chains. And if anyone wants to verify major allocations and wallets independently, they can do that on our official whales page: explorer.ice.io/whales You can clearly see the main pools there, including: Elector — staked coins from community users Rewards — community rewards pool, vested and locked BSC Bridge — coins allocated to bridge activity to BSC Team — team allocation, locked and vested Ecosystem Growth and Innovation — locked and vested Treasury — treasury allocation, also locked with vesting These addresses can also be cross-checked against our Coin Economics page: ice.io/coin-economics Everything is public. The contract is public. The distribution is public. The allocation model is public. So before repeating the claim that “the team can mint unlimited ION on BSC,” verify the data first. 3) “You stole $50M from investors in your previous project” This is another lie that keeps getting repeated by people who read one headline and then build a fantasy around it. I have never hidden the fact that I worked on another blockchain project before this one, and I have spoken openly about using the lessons from that experience to build ION better. The false “$50M stolen” narrative comes from a PR article that said we had raised approximately $50M. The reality is much simpler: at the time, we were in discussions with potential VCs who had shown interest. The money was never actually raised. That headline created a completely false impression, and now years later some people are using it as if it were proof of a crime. Use common sense for a second. If someone had really stolen $50M from investors while being publicly known, publicly visible, operating openly, and continuing to appear in public, do you seriously think that person would just be freely walking around with no consequences? The answer is obvious. No money was stolen. No $50M raise was completed. That narrative is fiction built on a misleading PR statement and amplified by people who want drama more than truth. 4) “You’re a hacker, ran a botnet, and all the rest of the nonsense” This is another story that has been twisted far beyond reality. Years ago, there was an article about a business I was involved in within the IP industry, and ever since then some people have used that to paint me as some kind of criminal mastermind. It is nonsense. What I can say is that in competitive internet industries, smear campaigns are real, trust attacks are real, and dirty tactics are common. I’ve seen that firsthand. A lot of people online read one article, make zero effort to understand the context, and then confidently spread the worst possible interpretation as if it were fact. Again, use logic. If I were what some of these anonymous accounts claim I am, do you think I would be operating publicly, showing my face, speaking live, attending events, and continuing to build in full view? People are free to question me. They are not free to replace evidence with fantasy. Where we are now As we announced a few days ago, we are not going anywhere. We are still building. Yes, for the time being we have chosen to develop closed-source, and we will make things public when we are ready. This time we are taking a different approach: building products that bring revenue and utility from day one, with a strong focus on users outside of crypto so adoption can be much broader and much faster. My history has taught me something very clearly: the bigger the project, the more noise comes with it. More lies. More hate. More people projecting their own frustration onto the team that kept working while they were busy posting theories. That changes nothing for me. We will keep building. We will keep shipping. We will keep fighting when necessary. And we will not stop because anonymous people on the internet decided to confuse fiction with facts. If you want to criticize, do it with evidence. If you want to verify, the data is public. If you want to spread lies, at least understand that I’m not going to bend to them. I’m still here. Still building. Still moving forward. That’s all that matters.

Seeing 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 in a bridge-related token flow does not expose a “hidden wallet.” It exposes a lack of understanding of how bridge contracts work. The null address is used to represent mint and burn events. That is standard behavior in cross-chain token infrastructure. So when someone looks at a burn/mint bridge flow and asks, “where is the original wallet behind the null address?”, they are asking the wrong question because the null address is not a user wallet. It is amazing how quickly some people jump to accusations before understanding even the most basic contract mechanics. The community deserves facts, not theatrics from people misreading standard bridge behavior.

@ice_blockchain 🫡🔥🔥🔥

🤔 To the people who rush to point fingers, spread fear, and act like experts without understanding even the basics of blockchain infrastructure: You are not protecting the community. You are poisoning it with noise. Crypto is already a hard industry. It does not need more panic from people doing surface-level analysis, misreading contracts, and turning their own lack of technical understanding into public accusations. This goes beyond our project. If you want to speak with authority in this space, learn how the technology actually works. Learn minting, burning, bridge flows, lock/unlock models, wrapped assets, liquidity mechanics, and on-chain traceability before you start posting like you uncovered some grand conspiracy. Because too often, what gets presented as “exposing the truth” is just ignorance dressed up as confidence. The industry grows when people verify before amplifying. When they study before accusing. When they bring signal instead of noise. So no, we will not stay silent while clueless narratives create unnecessary fear in the community. In crypto, education is not optional. If you are going to be loud, at least be informed.

🧑‍💻 An Update from the CEO Over the last two days, we made the decision to continue — and more importantly, we acted on it. We have already restructured the company and reduced operating costs from roughly $400,000 per month to around $45,000 per month. This was not easy, but it was necessary. We moved fast, cut deep, and focused only on what is essential. The last four years taught us many lessons, but one stands above all: A good idea means nothing if execution is too slow. That is the lesson we are taking forward into this next chapter. Our priority now is simple: focus on a fresh direction that can rebuild trust in the community while also generating real revenue for the company. We are no longer interested in wasting time, energy, or capital on anything that does not directly move us closer to product-market fit and sustainable growth. I will personally be joining the development effort to help bring this next product to market as fast as possible and to work directly with the team on execution. We are not going to repeat the mistake of overpromising before delivery. We will not reveal what we are building until it is ready. For those who still believe in us, stay with us a little longer — and when the time comes, we will show you. To move faster, we will be building this product in a closed-source environment during development. That decision is purely about speed and execution. Right now, shipping matters more than optics. Once we are live, we can focus on opening things up properly. We are now a smaller team, made up primarily of developers, and our time will be spent exactly where it should be spent: building. No distractions. No wasted effort. No unnecessary overhead. Just execution. Whether people choose to stand with us or not, we are moving forward with this plan. We are going to take this shot and see it through. Once the product is live, it will be something that can be marketed far beyond the crypto industry, which gives us a much stronger path toward real adoption and sustainable company revenue. At this moment, the company still holds a little over 1 billion $ION. These tokens will be used only to cover essential development and infrastructure costs. Because the previous service agreement has ended and that external funding is no longer available, we will be activating an automatic daily sale of $1,500 worth of tokens to help fund operations at the current market price. This is not a choice we make lightly, but it is the practical path that allows us to keep building over the coming months. Over the next 4 to 8 weeks, you should expect to see major changes across the website, the whitepaper, and most importantly, the launch of the first version of the new product. Our goal is clear: go live fast, get real feedback fast, and scale 10x faster than we did in the past. What we are building is a real utility product with real-world use, something unique within crypto and something we believe the market genuinely needs. Once it goes live, we believe adoption can accelerate faster than anything we have done before — because for the first time, our growth will be driven by real utility and real demand, not just belief alone. To everyone who has stood by us for the past four years: thank you. Give us 4 to 8 more weeks. That is all we ask. Stay with us, watch what we build, and witness how we turn the hardest moment in this project’s history into the foundation of its strongest chapter. We are still here. We are still building. And we are not done yet. Thank you for the support.

Let's wait & see the $ICE / $ION TEAMS next strategy or what they're rebranding to, probably another scam strategy 🤷‍♂️

🚨Now $ION is Listed @CoinMarketCap after Rebranded from $ICE with Its Metric Tokenomics. As ION Insiders We Request @CoinMarketCap To Verified @ice_blockchain token Metrics and remove those Warning ASP. Keep Fixing every thing dear @ice_z3us . Better things are on way💪

24H Top 5 Gainers on #KuCoin (April 14, 2026) 1. $MEZO - $0.09 (+212.77%) 2. $WET - $0.17 (+75.55%) 3. $BMB - $0.0038 (+128.21%) 4. $ION - $0.00028 (+46.56%) 5. $SYND - $0.06 (+43.36%) Check Out and Sign Up on KuCoin! kucoin.com/rewardshub?utm… #Ku24hour

@Bitcoinhabebe @saam8900 👀🔥🔥🔥

80-90% drops are part of crypto. Those who go through it are the one who stay. The $ION Team & community is here to stay, here to build, & here to grow . Look at ARIA. 95% dump in 2 days followed by a 1800% pump. $ION is down 90% in 2 days, all the sell pressure is gone. Now let’s run it back up exactly as $ARIA did.

@NFutmi @ice_blockchain Yes😎🔥🧊

@ice_blockchain @LvlCollection Now this is what I want to hear!!! Slowly but surely. We will get there.

✨ After listening to the community, we’ve made our decision: We stay. We build. We win. We’re restructuring the company from the ground up. Cutting waste. Dropping distractions. Doubling down on what actually matters. No more dead weight. No more inefficient spending. No more side paths. Just a leaner team, better execution, and total focus on scaling. This is not the end of anything. It’s the beginning of a stronger chapter. $ION is here to stay. The road to $1B market cap begins now.