MAGA Derp

MAGA are such fucking suckers.

@pinom912 @evets2727 @NEWSMAX So?

@MAGAderp @evets2727 @NEWSMAX The founding fathers were dead by the time the 14th amendment was written.

A majority of Americans believe all babies born in the country should automatically be granted citizenship, according to a poll carried out as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to rule on President Trump's effort to end the practice. newsmax.com/newsfront/birt…

@in_cape @NEWSMAX Yes it is.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX No, it’s “literally” not.

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX I'm just correct and use facts.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX You are not clever, you are just a fake.

@Ken4Colorado @NEWSMAX Doesn't matter. It's a U.S. Constitutional Amendment.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX That is not what they ruled at all. Kim's parents were here legally and ran a business here. Chinese proverb: It is better to keep your mouth shut & be thought a fool, than to open it & remove ALL doubt.

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX Facts don't care about your feelings.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX I feel like you must be a sad, pathetic, miserable loser.

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX Prove the ruling isn't correct. I'll wait.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX Reposting something that is not correct doesn't make it correct.

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX This will go nowhere. Don't you idiots EVER get tired of being played? EVER?

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX You have a very X way of posting. We will see how the Court rules. My guess is they will find a way not to rule on jurisdiction grounds.

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX Facts don't care about your feelings.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX Yes, but you were wrong. That is not what the Supreme Court held in that decision. Hence, why it is before the Court.

@Beerman_59 @evets2727 @NEWSMAX The Supreme Court decision that held children born to non-citizen residents, including undocumented immigrants, are citizens under the 14th Amendment is United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

@MAGAderp @evets2727 @NEWSMAX That shows how much you know. The founding fathers had absolutely nothing to do with the 14th amendment. That was after Lincoln and the civil war. This is one of the slave amendments and was never meant for illegal immigrants. Intent matters. YOU are a troll.

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX Go tell the Supreme Court that. Maybe your argument will win. The dipshits that Trump has hired to argue are a total bust.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX Wrong - They were permanent residents legally present.

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX Doesn't matter. I cited the case. End of story.

During the May 30, 1866, debate in the Congressional Globe, Howard explained: “This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX The Supreme Court decision that held children born to non-citizen residents, including undocumented immigrants, are citizens under the 14th Amendment is United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX Read the whole thing, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Read the words of the authors.

@Ken4Colorado @NEWSMAX The Supreme Court decision that held children born to non-citizen residents, including undocumented immigrants, are citizens under the 14th Amendment is United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX Not yet, they haven't. You might want to do your research before sounding like an idiot.

@meester850334 @Ken4Colorado @NEWSMAX The Supreme Court decision that held children born to non-citizen residents, including undocumented immigrants, are citizens under the 14th Amendment is United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

@TreborH31 @Beerman_59 @NEWSMAX The Supreme Court decision that held children born to non-citizen residents, including undocumented immigrants, are citizens under the 14th Amendment is United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

@MAGAderp @Beerman_59 @NEWSMAX Which decision was that?

@Beerman_59 @Ken4Colorado @NEWSMAX Yes, the fucking have. Is your Google broken?

@MAGAderp @Ken4Colorado @NEWSMAX SCOTUS has not ruled in this way. You are making shit up.

@TreborH31 @NEWSMAX Explain in detail then, canny legal wizard. Cite case law. I'll wait.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX Your cursing does not make your argument strong. The question centers on a legitimate legal question, which is why it is at the Supreme Court. Now in a way you will understand - You are a dumbass.

@Beerman_59 @NEWSMAX The Supreme Court has held that, under the 14th Amendment, children born to non-citizen residents, including undocumented immigrants, are considered "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. and are therefore citizens.

@MAGAderp @NEWSMAX No, it's not. It doesn't say ANYWHERE in the constitution that illegals can come here, dump a kid, and have that kid be a citizen.

@DFrancisco83725 @Danimal328 @NEWSMAX You haven't proven a goddamn thing. Cite case law. I'll wait.

@MAGAderp @Danimal328 @NEWSMAX This conversation might be a little over your head