Mark Bird

1.4K posts

Mark Bird banner
Mark Bird

Mark Bird

@MBird777

Christian, Conservative, College Professor (GBSC). Passionate about Theology, Apologetics, Ethics, and Discipleship. Worldview matters.

Alexandria, KY Katılım Şubat 2014
157 Takip Edilen232 Takipçiler
Mark Bird retweetledi
Jackie Chea ⚖️
Jackie Chea ⚖️@Fair_and_Biased·
.@benshapiro’s show opener today is spot on: He says that America is dividing into two new parties. The battle is btw the “American Exceptionalists” & the “Bipartisan Grievance Party.” American Exceptionalists: “America is awesome. We have historically been awesome, and we will be awesome again if we do the hard things that we must do.” Grievance Party: “America is not awesome, was never awesome, and will only be awesome if we fundamentally rewrite the American bargain and also retreat from the world for our great sins.” He says this battle will define our future as Americans.
English
717
844
7.2K
435.5K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Chris Hohnholz
Chris Hohnholz@Chris_Hohnholz·
It is possible for Christians and conservatives to do two things at once. We can generally support President Trump based on his policies and actions, things which we voted for. AND we can call out wrong attitudes, speech, and behavior that is inconsistent with biblical truth. Neither of these necessarily exclude the possibility of the other. Something to think about.
English
38
37
262
7.3K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Megan Basham
Megan Basham@megbasham·
Proud fundamentalist who believes the Genesis account of creation and that there was a literal Adam and Eve!! sorry to embarrass you intellectuals, but we’re not going to stop believing the text!
Tom Walker@tomrwalker

@garetrobinson @HonestYPTweets Exactly. Wright has tried to get the evangelical reputation away from the anti-intellectualism Mark Noll laid out in The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind but the fundamentalists continue to be persistent in their uninformed certainty away from a Wesleyan quadrilateral approach.

English
121
47
694
60.5K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Vivid.🇮🇱
Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess·
This tiny RED dot is Israel, the only Jewish state in the world. They want you to believe that the tiny RED dot is the oppressor and colonizer, and that the GREEN Muslim countries surrounding it are the oppressed. Just how delusional can they be?
Vivid.🇮🇱 tweet media
English
1.1K
4.6K
14.1K
226K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Megan Basham
Megan Basham@megbasham·
Can anyone recommend a Protestant podcaster who offers an apologia of our theology against Catholic theology who is a clear creationist—six days, global flood? I know there are some who do this who are local flood, symbolic creation type of people and I’m not interested in them. If it’s someone, for example, who would promote Biologos and Francis Collins or work with Biologos, I don’t want that guy. Is there anyone like this?
English
645
12
532
162.9K
Mark Bird retweetledi
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh@DavidLimbaugh·
The thing about kooks is that they don't know they're kooks, otherwise they wouldn't be kooks. Frauds are a different story. They know they're being frauds, and they don't care. Kooks + frauds = a combustible combination. Kooks + frauds + spiritually degenerate = Woke Right.
English
59
167
810
60.8K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Andrew Kolvet
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet·
🚨HUGE NEWS: After working on this behind the scenes for awhile now, we are excited to announce that EVERY EPISODE of The Charlie Kirk Show is now available. You asked, we delivered. From the first few episodes in May 2019 where it was just me and CK with a mic and a Zoom recorder to our first interview with Don Jr., through the 2020 election and into 2024 and the Trump transition, listen to all of your favorite Charlie episodes at your leisure. This took some doing, so please take advantage of the CK back catalogue. Charlie will never be forgotten.
English
1.1K
1.9K
14.1K
321.6K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Benny Johnson
Benny Johnson@bennyjohnson·
Stop scrolling and watch this... You will never hear a Republican give a better answer on why we must END all foreign migration. Rep. Brandon Gill: "I don't want to hear muslim calls for prayer in my community. I don't want the caste system in my children's schools because people don't assimilate. "I want to live in an America that is actually AMERICAN!" "We have a distinct heritage, a distinct culture that’s rooted in historical experience in the United States. And that’s something that we as conservatives should seek to actually CONSERVE." "And that means NOT flooding our country with infinity immigration every single year — whether it’s because of illegal immigration or legal immigration. It NEEDS to end." We need to stop allowing floods of immigrants to take over our communities and turn them into something unrecognizable. Spot on.
English
748
10.1K
34K
400K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Megan Basham
Megan Basham@megbasham·
I didn’t have much of a take on Trump‘s post today. I’m not a big foreign policy kind of gal. But what I DO observe is that a whole bunch of the evangelical media class who claim to be both conservative and Christian will truly look for any possible opening to distance themselves from Trump by claiming that the president is somehow outside the stream of our highly vaunted, oh-so-respectable political standards. Which is of course ridiculous when you look at the history of our political leaders and what THEY have done and said. So they want the credit for being conservative Christians, and they may even vote for exclusively Republican candidates, but they want to make sure everyone knows they don’t actually like those yucky Republican representatives who actually get things done. It’s a really dumb, boring game and I’m so tired of it. It’s actually kind of gross how much you guys want to signal that you should never be associated with anything Trump.
English
150
97
1.2K
55.2K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Dom Lucre | Stealer of Narratives
Democrats used the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to destroy the black family structure. • Every census from 1890 to 1950 showed that black labor force participation rates were higher than those of whites. • In 1950, 72% of all black men and 81% of black women had been married Pregnancies had been decreasing; both poverty and dependency were declining, and black income was rising in both absolute and relative terms to white income. • In 1965, 76.4% of black children were born to married women. What change? After the magnificent Dr. King advocated for peace and inclusion, this led to white guilt which Democrats used to take advantage of to fund President Johnson’s “War on Poverty This attacked longstanding values and principled behavior within the black American community This is what Democrat Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan called “defining deviancy downward.” & with Civil Rights Act of 1964 giving legal credence to making any sort of behavioral judgment toxic, the culture that held together the black American family was fundamentally changed. The result: • The 1960 census showed the first signs of a decline in black marriages, with acceleration in later years. • In 1980, 31% of all black first-born children were born to teenage mothers. • By 1992, 54% of all black children were living only with their mothers. • From 1990 to 1994, 77% of first births to black women were premarital. • By the 2000s, 75% of blacks with a high-school degree or some college were not married. • Less than half of black students graduated from high school in 2005. • Today, black males between the ages of 14 and 17 commit homicide at ten times the rate of white and Hispanic males of the same age combined. • In many urban areas, the black illegitimacy rate is well over 80%. Democrats hide our history because they intend to repeat it. They used white guilt to destroy us before. Do you think it’s random things got worse after BLM? We have to put our strings down. I am tired of us not being tired of being their puppets. What do we have to lose? We already lost ourselves along the way…
English
123
912
2.1K
83.2K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Vivid.🇮🇱
Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess·
In less than 120 seconds, Benjamin Netanyahu explains how radical Islam is not only after Jews and Israel, but also after Christians and America. This is a must watch.
English
63
675
2.4K
33K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck@glennbeck·
I saw two stories about the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk and they couldn't have been more different. One story said, “The bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson”. That headline is designed to raise your heart rate: WHAT?! They don't match?! What else did they lie about?! The second headline emphasized important context: there was an “inconclusive link between the bullet from the autopsy and the rifle.” So, the bullet was too destroyed to tell if it matched at all. That's a huge difference. This is the key to surviving in today's insane media landscape. When you read a headline, ask yourself: what kind of narrative are they trying to build in my mind? Are they telling me what to think or giving me the facts needed to make my own decision?
English
322
921
5.8K
215.3K
Mark Bird retweetledi
The Babylon Bee
The Babylon Bee@TheBabylonBee·
Satan Declares Victory After Death Of Jesus
English
56
258
1.8K
172.6K
Mark Bird
Mark Bird@MBird777·
J.D. Vance, I hope you are listening...
M.A. Rothman@MichaelARothman

𝐕𝐃𝐇: 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐈𝐒 𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐕𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐀 𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐆𝐄 Victor Davis Hanson is reading Trump's body language — and what he sees is a president recalibrating his inner circle in real time. VDH starts by giving Vance his due. In 2024, Vance "𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢," destroyed everyone he debated, and made Walz look like "𝘢 𝘣𝘶𝘧𝘧𝘰𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴" — all with surgical calm. His attitude toward opponents was almost generous: "𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦. 𝘐 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶." Formidable. But that was the campaign. Then came governing. Iran. Venezuela. Cuba. None of it was MAGA orthodoxy. The strikes took out Iran's nuclear facilities and its supreme leader. The Venezuela operation grabbed Maduro right out from under his Cuban bodyguards with zero American d∗aths. Bold, decisive — and exactly the kind of engagement that puts Vance in 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. As VDH explains it, Vance knows Trump values "𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺" above everything. But his power base — Tucker, Don Jr., Tucker's son on his own staff, the people who got him the VP nomination — are the ones most opposed to the foreign engagements. Trump acknowledged the rift publicly, telling reporters he and Vance are 𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 on Iran (ABC News). To his credit, Vance handled it well — "𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘶𝘱 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦." But the tension is real. Meanwhile, enter 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧. VDH's nickname is perfect. Panama problem? Send Rubio. Vance blew things up with Zelensky and the Europeans? Send Rubio to play good cop. Personable, speaks Spanish, popular — and Trump is heaping praise on him. When reporters asked about a disagreement with Vance, Trump was notably lukewarm. Then he pivoted to Rubio: "𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘰 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺." That contrast isn't accidental. That's Trump's antennas telling the room where the loyalty ledger stands. Then VDH turns to Tucker — and this part stings. Hanson was on Tucker's show for years and never heard any of what Tucker is saying now. There's an internet compilation of Tucker's own past statements where he was "𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘷𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘵" against radical Islam and Iran. Now he's calling Trump's Iran decision 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐠𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥 and claiming that when you demand unconditional surrender, it historically leads to mass r∗pe of the defeated population (Mediaite). Trump's response was blunt: Tucker is 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐌𝐀𝐆𝐀. VDH dismantles Tucker's premise with a single example. America demanded unconditional surrender from Japan. Douglas MacArthur served as pro-consul for eight years. There was no mass r∗pe by Americans. Tucker's claim doesn't survive contact with the most obvious parallel in modern history. The message VDH is decoding is clear: Vance needs to divorce himself from the extremist voices, recommit to Trump's agenda as executed — not as debated on podcasts — and prove that loyalty runs both ways. If he doesn't, the man Trump keeps calling the greatest Secretary of State in history is right there. 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐤 𝐫𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐜. 𝐀𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞.

English
0
0
0
15
Mark Bird retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
✝️ Happy Easter! ✝️
English
21.3K
41K
638.5K
87.2M
Mark Bird retweetledi
Chad Prather
Chad Prather@WatchChad·
WOW! A drone show put on by a church in Manvel, Texas depicts our Savior Jesus on the cross. One of the coolest things I’ve ever seen. Tomorrow, HE IS RISEN.
English
2.7K
9.4K
45.3K
4.8M
Mark Bird retweetledi
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh@DavidLimbaugh·
I asked the AI study guide in Logos Bible Software about the term angel of the Lord in the Old Testament and why evangelical scholars interpreted that to mean a pre-incarnate version of Christ. I further asked it about the Jewish interpretation. I think the answer is interesting as it always is. Angel of the Lord > Many evangelical scholars believe that the term angel of the Lord in the Old Testament describes pre-incarnate appearances of the son of God. Why did they come to believe that God is not an angel his son is not an angel so how did Bible scholars come up with the theory that the term angel of the Lord was in fact a pre-incarnate Christ? Also, how did the Jews interpret that phrase and how was that phrase? translated in the Hebrew scriptures. Evangelical scholars arrived at the preincarnate Christ interpretation through careful textual analysis rather than theological assumption. The angel of the Lord identifies himself as Yahweh in accounts like Abraham and Jacob’s encounters, speaking both for and as God, while others identify him as God—as seen in Hagar’s and Joseph’s stories.[1] Although Scripture teaches that only God deserves worship, the Angel of the Lord accepts reverence and worship.[1] These characteristics—combined with the angel’s divine knowledge and actions—suggested a figure distinct from ordinary messengers yet possessing divine attributes. A crucial observation strengthened this interpretation: theologians noticed the phrase “the angel of the Lord” never appears after Jesus arrives in the New Testament, suggesting that once the incarnation occurred, this unique heavenly representative became obsolete because Jesus became God’s earthly, visible representative.[2] Unlike other angelic beings who refused worship because they were creatures, the angel of the Lord accepted it without rebuke, and unlike other angels who emphatically declared their creatureliness when people sought to worship them, the angel of the Lord did not.[3] Regarding Jewish interpretation, the evidence is complex. Jewish theologians prior to the New Testament era, observing texts featuring the Angel and other “dual Yahweh” language, developed a theology of two powers in heaven—a teaching Jewish authorities declared heresy after the second century AD.[4] In the Septuagint (Greek translation), only 33 of 56 occurrences carry the definite article, making it difficult to determine conclusively whether Alexandrian Jewish translators understood this “Angel” as having unique identity or as simply one of God’s heavenly hosts.[5] The Aramaic Targums, however, rendered Genesis 4:1 as “I have gotten a man, the angel of Jehovah” or “the angel of the Lord,” suggesting rabbis recognized something supernatural in the text.[6] [1] David J. MacLeod, “The Trinity and Scripture,” Emmaus Journal (2002), 11:2:195. [2] René A. López, “Identifying the ‘Angel of the Lord’ in the Book of Judges: A Model for Reconsidering the Referent in Other Old Testament Loci,” Bulletin for Biblical Research (2010), 14. [3] Douglas McCready, He Came down from Heaven: The Preexistence of Christ and the Christian Faith (Downers Grove, IL; Leicester, England: InterVarsity Press; Apollos, 2005), 180–181. [4] Michael S. Heiser, The Bible Unfiltered: Approaching Scripture on Its Own Terms (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2017), 67. [5] John M. Jr. Baze, “The Angel of the Lord in the Old Testament—Part II,” Conservative Theological Journal (1998), 2:4:66. [6] Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, Ariel’s Bible Commentary: The Book of Genesis (San Antonio, TX: Ariel Ministries, 2008), 115–116.
English
31
24
179
60.9K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Kyle Mann
Kyle Mann@The_Kyle_Mann·
If Jesus's Resurrection Were a Hoax Prolly my favorite sketch we ever did at @TheBabylonBee
English
161
1.6K
7.6K
661.1K
Mark Bird retweetledi
Sean McDowell
Sean McDowell@Sean_McDowell·
Only one religion is based on a single, testable, historical event. If you haven’t at least considered the evidence for the resurrection, NOW is the time.
English
173
268
2.3K
229.8K
Mark Bird retweetledi
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh@DavidLimbaugh·
John Lennox is one of a kind. I almost retweeted this without listening to it, but then I wanted to listen to it so badly. I just went ahead and listened, but I can assure you I would tweet anything he said without review anytime. Bonus: I love his accent.
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker@BiblicalBeauty

Oxford professor John Lennox on testing the reality of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ: "Now, my final point is this. I'm a scientist of sorts, and people say to me, 'Come on. You can't believe this stuff.' Because in science and practical science you do experiments. You test your hypothesis. Christianity is not testable. Isn't it? Isn't it? You see, the difference between the two last things I read were the difference between seeing something, those grave cloths, and working out an intellectual conclusion that something utterly remarkable has happened. That's not quite the same thing as meeting the risen Jesus. And you see, ladies and gentlemen, if it is true that Jesus rose from the dead, then He's still alive, and it's possible to meet Him. Now, you can do an experiment, and it's this—this Jesus who claims to be risen tells us that if we're prepared to trust Him, repent of the mess we've made of our own lives, and the lives of other people, and we're prepared to receive Him as Lord and Controller of life as the risen Son of God, then He will give us forgiveness. Does the word forgiveness mean anything to you? He'll give us new life and a new power... Now, ladies and gentlemen, this is the test...When you see people with narcotic or alcohol dependence, and they've no food to put on the table in front of their children, and you meet them then a year later, and something has happened. You say, 'What's happened to you?' and they say something like, 'Well, I met Jesus,' or 'I became a Christian,' or they'll put it different ways. When you see that again and again, you add two and two to get four. I wouldn't sit here for a nanosecond if I didn't believe that not only is the resurrection of Jesus intellectually credible, but I believe it's existentially credible because the center part of my life and that of my wife and family is to walk with Him from day to day. Now, that may sound absolute jargon and mumbo-jumbo to you, but we're living in a universe where we discover that we are persons, and every analogy we know tells us that our origin cannot be sub-personal. It's supra-personal. And if we enjoy human friendship, what a magnificent thing it is if God makes a way where we can through faith in Christ become His sons and daughters and enjoy the biggest friendship and the most exciting friendship in the universe, and that is friendship with the risen Christ."

English
16
110
542
49K