

M Compass Media
5.4K posts

@MCompassMedia
Bringing you news & views from Ireland and around the world



"𝐀𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝-𝐂𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝": 𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐝 𝐋𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐒𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐬 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚’𝐬 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭’𝐬 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐬 A recent report by Ann Murphy in the Irish Examiner says there’s growing concerns about the impact of restructuring within Tusla on children in care, particularly around the allocation and continuity of social workers. The report centres on a case in Waterford, where five children were assigned a social worker despite the fact that the worker was due to transfer to another section within weeks. This short term allocation, covering only a brief period from mid February to the end of the month, was criticised by guardian ad litem Donal Traynor as a “knee jerk” decision that was “anything but child centred”. He also expressed broader concern about other children he represents who remain without a newly assigned social worker during the ongoing restructuring process. The reforms, which involve a significant reorganisation of Tusla’s service delivery model, will expand its regional structure from 17 areas to 30 local networks. While Tusla maintains that this change is designed to ensure more equitable distribution of services and better integration of early intervention and child protection supports, critics fear that the transition is already disrupting care arrangements for vulnerable children. Tusla, in response, pointed to national figures indicating that the majority of children in care do have assigned key workers. At the end of 2025, 89% of children in care had an allocated key worker, most of whom were social workers, with the remainder assigned to other professionals. Similarly, 77% of open social work cases had an allocated case worker, rising to 82% in the Waterford and Wexford area. However, these figures also highlight that a notable proportion of children and cases remain without direct social worker support. The use of “other professionals” instead of qualified social workers raises additional questions about the consistency and quality of care being provided. The report also situates these issues within wider systemic pressures, including a sharp rise in referrals to Tusla, which exceeded 106,000 last year, and ongoing staffing shortages. In response, Tusla has introduced a new training college aimed at boosting staffing levels in special care and residential services. Despite this, capacity remains constrained, with only 15 of 25 available special care beds currently operational due to staffing deficits. Overall, the article paints a picture of a system under strain, attempting to implement structural reform while grappling with resource limitations. While Tusla emphasises its commitment to ensuring that every child in care has an allocated social worker, the experiences outlined in the report suggest that gaps in service provision and continuity of care remain a significant concern during this period of transition.

𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐑𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐲 𝐀𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐝𝐮𝐥𝐭 A report by Kitty Holland highlights a complex and legally significant case before the Tusla and the Dublin District Court, where the State is seeking to determine whether a young person currently in care is in fact an adult. The individual, who arrived in Ireland as an unaccompanied asylum seeker, has been under Tusla’s care on the basis that they are a minor without guardianship in the State. However, Tusla has now concluded, following what it described as an “assessment of eligibility for services”, that the person may not be a child. On that basis, the agency is asking the court to conduct a formal inquiry under Section 32 of the Child Care Act 1991 to determine the individual’s true age. The court heard that Tusla intends to call six or seven witnesses, including individuals from outside the jurisdiction, and will rely on a substantial body of documentation. The purpose of the inquiry is to allow the court to establish the person’s age, which under law will then be deemed their true age unless proven otherwise. Despite seeking to progress the inquiry, Tusla also applied for an extension of the existing interim care order, which was granted. Judge John Campbell noted that the original order had been made on the “narrow basis” that the young person was a minor without legal guardianship in the State, and that this condition still technically applies pending a final determination. Legal representatives for the young person raised concerns about the timing of the inquiry. Barrister Brian Barrington, acting for the court appointed advocate, argued that it was premature to move forward while an internal Tusla appeal process, challenging the agency’s conclusion that the person is not a child, has not yet concluded. He also stressed that, in legal terms, the individual must still be treated as a minor until the court determines otherwise. The court was also asked to delay setting a hearing date to allow a solicitor, who has agreed to act for the young person, to come on record and address the court. Issues around representation were noted, including the distinction between a court appointed advocate and the possibility of separate legal representation in a Section 32 inquiry. Judge Campbell indicated that the case reflects a shifting position, remarking that “the sands are beginning to shift”, suggesting an evolving assessment of the situation. A date for the inquiry into the young person’s age is expected to be set shortly. Overall, the case raises significant legal and ethical questions about age assessment, due process, and the treatment of vulnerable individuals within the care system, particularly in the context of unaccompanied minors seeking asylum.


𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐭 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐲 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐈𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐕𝐮𝐥𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧, 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐏𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐁𝐞𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 In his contribution to yesterday’s Independent Ireland motion on the structural reform of child welfare governance, Deputy McCarthy delivered a stark and wide ranging critique of Tusla, arguing that the agency is failing to meet the basic standards required to protect vulnerable children. He began by acknowledging that the issues under discussion are not new, noting that he has repeatedly raised concerns about Tusla both in the Dáil and at committee level. While stressing that children in State care are entitled to the highest standards of protection, he warned that “those standards are not always met,” pointing in particular to serious deficiencies in care provision and in supports for young people leaving the system. A central concern in his speech was the scale of children going missing from care. Citing figures reported by TheJournal.ie, he highlighted that children in Tusla-run homes were reported missing on nearly 7,000 occasions between January 2020 and September 2025. He warned that when vulnerable children go missing, they are exposed to “severe risk of being exploited or harmed,” referencing cases where children have suffered serious harm after absconding from care. Deputy McCarthy also pointed to deep structural problems within Tusla, including chronic staff shortages, overstretched services and failures in basic governance. He stated that too many children remain without an allocated social worker and that this issue is particularly acute in certain regions. He described situations where court orders relating to children in care were not complied with, and where Tusla failed to inform the courts of critical gaps in service, including the absence of assigned social workers. These failures, he argued, reflect systemic breakdowns “at all levels,” compounded by what he characterised as a Department that “washes its hands” of responsibility. Drawing on findings from HIQA inspections, he outlined ongoing concerns about inconsistent practice, delayed assessments, inadequate oversight and poor communication with families. In his view, these are not isolated incidents but indicators of long standing governance failures and poor planning at Government level, particularly in relation to workforce capacity. A significant portion of his contribution focused on the risks posed by expanding Tusla’s responsibilities under the International Protection Bill. He warned that the agency is already “under-resourced, overstretched and unable to meet its statutory duties,” and that assigning additional responsibilities for unaccompanied minors without first addressing capacity issues would be “dangerous.” He noted that pre-legislative scrutiny had already raised concerns about Tusla’s lack of staffing and operational capacity, and he criticised the Government for proceeding with the legislation regardless. He also raised serious concerns about the continued use of unregulated special emergency arrangements, highlighting that more than 1,100 children have been placed in such settings without HIQA oversight. Referring to the tragic death of Vadym Davydenko, he underscored the risks inherent in these placements. He further cited remarks by Judge Conor Fottrell, who condemned profiteering by private operators in this area as “wrong and shameful,” noting that judicial warnings about Tusla’s failures have been repeated over time. Deputy McCarthy concluded by questioning the coherence of Government policy, arguing that one Department is imposing additional burdens on Tusla while another is responsible for overseeing the agency.

𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐬 𝐑𝐚𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚’𝐬 𝐇𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐒𝐞𝐱 𝐀𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐎𝐟 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐞 Independent Ireland TD Michael Collins, speaking during his Party’s Dáil motion on the structural reform of child welfare governance, delivered a stark and deeply personal critique of Tusla’s frontline performance, drawing on a series of cases from his constituency in west Cork to illustrate what he described as a system that is unresponsive, inaccessible and failing vulnerable children. Collins told the House that he encounters distressed families “every week” who have reached breaking point after seeking help, only to be met with delays, silence or a lack of clarity from the agency. He said that when public representatives attempt to intervene, they are “told it is a matter for Tusla and that is the end of it,” questioning what such a response means for “a child who needs help today, not six months down the line.” In his view, the system is deteriorating while continuing to operate at its own pace, disconnected from the urgency of real life situations. He outlined a number of troubling cases to underscore his concerns. In one, he described prolonged and serious sexual abuse within a family home over many years, raising what he called “fundamental questions” about Tusla’s role and asking how such vulnerable individuals could have been left unprotected for so long. In another case, a 14 year old girl who had been groomed online by a man in his 40s was taken into State care, yet remained able to maintain contact with the alleged perpetrator due to inadequate supervision in her foster placement, a situation he described as extremely dangerous. Collins also highlighted a case in which children were removed from their mother following allegations of inappropriate behaviour, where the social worker involved was a neighbour of the children’s father, giving rise to concerns about a potential conflict of interest. He said that proper procedures may not have been followed and that Tusla appeared to have acted with undue haste. While the matter was referred to An Garda Síochána, it now appears unlikely that charges will be brought, and several Tusla staff have been reported to CORU and are under investigation. Through these examples, Collins painted a picture of a system marked by delay, questionable decision making and a lack of accountability, warning that vulnerable children and families are being left exposed while those seeking answers are met with barriers rather than support.

𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐲 𝐆𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐆𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐞𝐱 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐃𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐀 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 Minister for Children Norma Foley in response yesterday’s Dáil debate on the Independent Ireland motion on the structural reform of child welfare governance mounted a strong defence of Tusla, rejecting calls for its dissolution and insisting that the agency remains a robust, accountable and essential pillar of the State’s child protection system. In a lengthy amendment to the motion, the Minister sought to replace criticism of Tusla with a statement of confidence in its structures, staffing and reform programme. She emphasised that Tusla operates as “the single dedicated agency with a clear statutory remit” and is subject to “robust governance and oversight arrangements,” while also stressing the statutory independence of its staff as “necessary for the performance of their duties.” While acknowledging public concern arising from recent high profile cases, the Minister did not directly address the specific failures highlighted in recent days, including judicial findings describing special emergency arrangements as “a national scandal,” warnings that Tusla is “extraordinarily exposed” to future compensation claims, and ongoing concerns about missing children in State care. Instead, her contribution focused on structural and operational strengths within the agency. She pointed to a significant increase in demand, including a 46 per cent rise in referrals since 2021 and a 500 per cent increase in separated children seeking international protection since 2022, arguing that Tusla is operating under unprecedented pressure. She highlighted increased investment, with the agency’s budget rising to more than €1.3 billion in 2026, alongside a €35 million capital allocation aimed at expanding State owned residential care and reducing reliance on special emergency arrangements. The Minister repeatedly praised Tusla staff, describing them as “well qualified” and committed professionals working in a “very demanding environment.” She stated that 99 per cent of children in care have an allocated key worker and that 87 per cent are placed in foster care, presenting these figures as evidence of a system functioning effectively despite growing demand. She also pointed to positive outcomes for young people leaving care, citing Central Statistics Office findings that approximately nine in ten care leavers aged 18 to 23 are in employment or education. Recruitment and retention measures were also emphasised, including new training pathways, apprenticeship routes and the establishment of a residential services training college. A central plank of her argument was the preservation of Tusla’s operational independence from the Department, which she described as fundamental to ensuring professional decision making. She warned that dismantling the agency would risk destabilising front line services, arguing that Tusla’s creation in 2014 represented “the most significant reform of child safety in the history of the State,” designed to replace a fragmented system with a unified and accountable structure. However, the Minister’s failure to engage with the substance of recent controversies drew sharp contrast with the tone of the wider debate. While she accepted that “it is right that there should be public concern, scrutiny and questions asked,” her remarks did not grapple with the specific systemic risks highlighted in court judgments and media reports this week. She concluded by reaffirming the Government’s commitment to Tusla, urging the House to support the amendment and reject proposals to dissolve the agency.


𝐃𝐞𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐲 𝐊𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐁𝐞 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐟𝐟 @sinnfeinireland spokesperson on children, Deputy @ClaireKerrane, speaking during this evening’s Independent Ireland Dail motion on the structural reform of child welfare governance, welcomed the debate but delivered a stark warning about serious systemic failures within child protection services, stressing that urgent reform is needed to properly safeguard children in State care. She highlighted the long standing shortage of social workers, noting that judges have repeatedly raised concerns about children being left without an allocated social worker. She expressed alarm at proposals within Tusla to assign cases to social care workers instead, stating clearly that “it is not acceptable for children to be allocated to those in other professional grades rather than to social workers” and warning that such an approach “cannot proceed.” While acknowledging the role of social care workers, she said they themselves have raised concerns about being asked to take on duties beyond their training. She also questioned what meaningful oversight by social work management would look like in practice given staffing shortages. Deputy Kerrane pointed to serious findings from a HIQA inspection in Dublin north city, highlighting ongoing failures in governance and oversight. She said risks identified previously had not been addressed and criticised discrepancies in Tusla’s own reporting, where the service declared widespread compliance but inspections found otherwise. She illustrated the consequences with the case of a non verbal child left waiting more than two months for basic safety planning. She also raised concern about attempts to withdraw essential therapeutic supports, including play therapy services in the south east. Foster carers in Carlow, Kilkenny and south Tipperary had to mobilise to prevent their removal, while issues remain unresolved in Waterford. The suggestion that such supports could be withdrawn was, she said, “incredible in this day and age.” Turning to special emergency arrangements, she stated that “in this State in 2026, there should not be a single child in an unregulated and uninspected setting,” linking their continued use to a failure to build sufficient care capacity. She also warned of safeguarding concerns, referencing reports of referrals to the Garda National Vetting Bureau. Addressing special care shortages, she noted that although 26 beds exist, only 15 are operational due to staffing issues. This has resulted in situations where judges direct that children require special care, even in life threatening circumstances, but no placements are available. “It is not acceptable,” she said. Deputy Kerrane also challenged claims that foster care numbers are increasing, pointing instead to a decline from 4,130 carers in 2019 to 3,782 last year, with more carers leaving than joining in 2025. She stressed that foster care provides stability and “unconditional love, perhaps for the first time in their lives,” yet carers receive no State pension after decades of service. While highly critical of Tusla, she cautioned against placing all blame on the agency, arguing that responsibility ultimately lies with Government. “It is sometimes too easy to blame Tusla,” she said, calling for far greater political accountability, investment and capacity building to ensure that vulnerable children are properly protected.

𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 “𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫,” 𝐃𝐞𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐲 𝐓𝐨́𝐢𝐛𝐢́𝐧 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐃𝐚́𝐢𝐥 During this evening’s Independent Ireland motion on the structural reform of child welfare governance, @AontuIE leader @Toibin1 delivered a stark assessment of Tusla’s child protection system, warning that vulnerable children are being exposed to serious harm within a structure he described as fundamentally broken and lacking accountability. He stressed that these concerns are not new, but have been repeatedly raised for years without meaningful reform. He pointed to deeply troubling findings from the National Review Panel showing that 235 children have died either in State care or known to the State between 2014 and February 2026, describing this as a profound and ongoing human tragedy unfolding within the lifetime of the current Dáil. Deputy Tóibín emphasised the immediacy of the crisis, noting that five children have already died in the first eight weeks of 2026 alone, in circumstances including violence, suicide, accidents, and unexplained causes. He argued that such figures should provoke national outrage, yet instead remain largely absent from political and public discourse. A central theme of his contribution was systemic fragmentation. He highlighted cases where failures in coordination between agencies led to devastating outcomes, including teenagers denied access to mental health services and a young girl whose disclosure of sexual abuse was not followed up due to confusion between Tusla regions. These cases, he argued, reflect a system where responsibility is unclear and children fall through critical gaps. He also raised concerns about the State’s response to child trafficking, stating there is no mechanism to cross reference children identified as at risk with those missing from care. In his view, this represents a serious failure of safeguarding, particularly given rising numbers of minors identified as trafficked. Deputy Tóibín strongly criticised the continued use of special emergency arrangements for children in care, describing them as a major Government failure. He highlighted revelations that unvetted individuals had been working with vulnerable children, calling this a fundamental breach of child safety rather than an administrative oversight. He further outlined deteriorating conditions within these placements, where children are frequently moved between unsuitable settings such as hotels and bed and breakfasts, often with limited supervision and reduced oversight despite increasing numbers in care. He contrasted this with the significant public expenditure involved, arguing that basic standards of care and stability are still not being met. A recurring issue throughout his speech was the absence of political accountability. He criticised what he described as a pattern of ministers claiming ignorance of serious incidents, despite repeated warnings and parliamentary interventions. He concluded by referencing particularly serious cases, including a young girl allegedly trafficked shortly after entering care and another incident involving the placement of an adult within a children’s setting that resulted in a fatality. These, he argued, point not to isolated failures but to a systemic collapse in safeguarding. Overall, DeputyTóibín framed the situation as an urgent national crisis driven by structural weaknesses, poor oversight, and a failure of political responsibility, calling for a fundamental reassessment of how child welfare governance is organised and enforced in the State.

“𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦” - 𝐃𝐞𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐲 𝐉𝐨𝐡𝐧 𝐌𝐜𝐆𝐮𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐒𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐬 𝐓𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 Speaking in the Dáil on Wednesday during statements marking International Women’s Day, @JMcGuinnessTD delivered a stark and deeply critical assessment of how young women, particularly those involved with Tusla and the family court system, are being treated by State institutions. Drawing on testimonies he has personally heard, McGuinness highlighted what he described as a pattern of demeaning, dismissive, and harmful treatment of vulnerable young mothers within both the child protection system and court proceedings. His contribution shifted the focus from symbolic recognition of women to the lived reality of those navigating State systems in crisis. He emphasised that many of these women are not only dealing with complex personal and family challenges, but are also being subjected to processes that fail to acknowledge their dignity or lived experience. “What is said to them, how it is said to them and how it treats them badly… does not acknowledge fully what they are going through.” McGuinness described this as not merely an administrative failing, but a serious moral and societal issue, placing responsibility on both the social care system and the courts. “Quite frankly, I think that is a disgusting element of society, a disgusting part of our social system and our court system.” In one of the most striking moments of his address, he warned that the very systems intended to support vulnerable women are instead contributing to their distress and disempowerment. “Their lives are being stolen from them and they are turning to the system, which it seems turns against them.” He concluded by expressing his personal shock at the accounts he has heard, underscoring the urgency of reform and the need for a more humane, respectful approach. “I am shocked by the stories they have told me and by the way they were treated.”

𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐤 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰: 𝐎’𝐅𝐥𝐲𝐧𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 Independent Ireland TD Ken O’Flynn has said responsibility for child protection should be removed from Tusla and returned to direct ministerial and departmental control, arguing that the current system lacks clear accountability and is no longer fit for purpose. He is bringing a motion before the Dáil today which seeks to initiate a review of the existing model. Speaking on Newstalk Breakfast, Mr O’Flynn said the central issue underpinning the proposal is the absence of clear responsibility within the current governance structure. He argued that returning child protection functions to direct ministerial oversight would ensure that “somebody finally” takes responsibility for decisions and outcomes in a system that has come under sustained criticism in recent years. He pointed to a pattern of warnings emerging from multiple sources, including the courts, independent inspections and official reports, all of which, he said, have consistently raised concerns about the performance and oversight of child protection services. Inspections, he noted, have “repeatedly identified serious deficiencies”, adding that the accumulation of such findings indicates deeper systemic problems rather than isolated failings. “Enough is enough here. There’s something wrong,” he said. While critical of the system, Mr O’Flynn emphasised that his concerns are not directed at frontline staff, whom he described as “fabulous people” working under difficult conditions. According to him, these difficulties point to problems in oversight and organisation rather than in the commitment of those working within the system. The motion, he said, is not calling for the immediate abolition of Tusla, but instead proposes a structured and phased approach to reform. This would include the development of a White Paper outlining best standards and practices, alongside a transition period of up to 24 months to allow for careful implementation and to avoid disruption to services. The aim, he said, is to examine the structure in a considered way and determine whether fundamental changes are required. Mr O’Flynn also suggested that the current model reflects a broader policy trend of establishing semi autonomous agencies, which he argued can dilute ministerial accountability. He said this approach allows responsibility to be distanced from government departments, with ministers less directly exposed to operational failures. In his view, this has contributed to a situation where accountability for child protection outcomes is unclear. Reflecting on the origins of Tusla, he said the agency had been established in part to bring together functions that had previously been spread across multiple departments. However, he argued that the current structure may now be contributing to the very difficulties it was intended to resolve. In particular, he pointed to ongoing challenges in addressing the needs of vulnerable children as evidence that the system requires re examination. He maintained that any reform must prioritise both the protection of children and the support of staff working within the system. “If something is wrong with the structure, in particular when you’re talking about the most vulnerable of society, protecting our children, then we have to get that right,” he said. He added that reform should not only improve outcomes for children but also create a more effective and supportive environment for those tasked with delivering services. The motion is expected to form part of a broader debate in the Dáil on the future governance of child protection services, with the Government indicating it will oppose the proposal and defend the current model, arguing that reform is already underway within Tusla. #tusla #ireland

𝐀 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐓𝐃𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐛𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐃𝐚́𝐢𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 🧵 1/2 A Private Members’ Motion to be debated in Dáil Éireann at 5.26 pm today by @independent_ire TDs @kenoflynnTD , @MichaelC_IND_TD ,@RichardODonoghu an @FitzForDail sets out a far reaching proposal to restructure how child protection is governed in Ireland, placing the current model under sustained political scrutiny. The motion centres on the role of Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, and argues that while the protection and welfare of children is one of the State’s most fundamental constitutional obligations, the system through which this responsibility is delivered is no longer adequate. The motion contends that Tusla’s position at arm’s length from direct ministerial control, while funded by the Exchequer, has created blurred lines of accountability between the agency and the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality. It argues that this separation has contributed to delays in political responsiveness and has made it more difficult for elected representatives to secure timely intervention in urgent and serious child welfare cases. In this framing, responsibility is diffused across structures, with the effect that decisive action can be slowed by the design of the system itself. Drawing on a decade of reviews and audits, the motion identifies a pattern of persistent problems including delays in child protection assessments, ongoing challenges in recruiting and retaining social workers, a backlog in referrals, and inconsistencies in case management standards. These issues are presented not as isolated operational failures but as evidence of deeper structural weaknesses within the governance model. The scale and complexity of Tusla’s funding arrangements are also highlighted. The motion notes that in 2024 some 451 organisations were funded under Section 56 arrangements, alongside a further 121 organisations supported through education services, bringing the total number of externally funded bodies to approximately 572. This level of fragmentation, it argues, raises questions about administrative overheads, duplication of governance, financial transparency, and the absence of a coherent strategic approach. The motion points to international practice where child protection functions are often embedded directly within government departments, allowing for clearer democratic accountability and more direct ministerial oversight. By contrast, the Irish model is characterised as one that distances political responsibility from operational delivery. While acknowledging the demanding work of frontline social workers and child protection professionals, the motion emphasises that any reform must safeguard vulnerable children, maintain continuity of services, and be carefully phased and evidence based. Against this backdrop, the motion calls for an independent governance review to examine the feasibility of dissolving Tusla as a separate legal entity and transferring its statutory powers directly to the Minister. It further proposes that within twelve months the Government publish a White Paper outlining options for reform, including the creation of a child protection directorate within the Department, consolidation of policy and operational authority, streamlined funding structures, and strengthened ministerial accountability. A phased transition over a twelve to twenty four month period is envisaged, alongside enhanced financial oversight and the establishment or reinforcement of an independent statutory inspectorate.

𝐀 𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚’𝐬 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚 “𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥”. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞, 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐮𝐧𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬, 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞?

𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐬: 𝐌𝐢𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐕𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐚 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞 A report in the Irish Examiner by Ann Murphy highlights deeply troubling concerns regarding the large number of migrant children who remain missing in Ireland, with renewed scrutiny now focusing on the role of State agencies, including Tusla, in safeguarding these vulnerable young people. The issue has been brought sharply into focus by the Special Rapporteur on Racial Equality and Racism, Ebun Joseph, who described herself as “in shock” after reviewing findings that more than 130 children and young people who disappeared over the past five decades remain missing. While some high profile Irish cases are included, the overwhelming majority of those unaccounted for are migrant children, many of whom have never received sustained public attention. The report details patterns of disappearances that raise serious systemic concerns. These include clusters of children going missing from specific accommodation centres, often within short timeframes, and in some cases on the same day. Particularly striking are cases involving groups of Chinese teenagers who disappeared between 2006 and 2009, alongside multiple incidents involving children from a wide range of countries including Nigeria, Somalia, Afghanistan and Romania. Central to these concerns is the role of Tusla, the State body charged with the care and protection of separated children seeking international protection. The report highlights a significant gap in Tusla’s records, with the agency unable to provide verified data for key years between 2006 and 2009, when many of these disappearances occurred. This absence of reliable data raises serious questions about oversight, monitoring and accountability during a critical period. Tusla has acknowledged that there were risks associated with children absconding from care, particularly among certain groups, and pointed to links with An Garda Síochána in managing these risks. However, the scale and pattern of the disappearances outlined in the report suggest systemic failures that go beyond individual cases, pointing instead to weaknesses in how vulnerable migrant children were protected within the State’s care system. Ebun Joseph has indicated that she will now raise the matter directly with Government and is seeking to bring together stakeholders across ethnic communities and public bodies to examine the issue further. She warned that the numbers involved are far too high to be explained simply by children choosing to leave care, and criticised the absence of any sustained national response, stating that no “red alert” was ever triggered. The findings raise profound questions about how children in State care, particularly those already vulnerable due to displacement and migration, could disappear in such numbers without a coordinated or transparent response. In this context, Tusla’s role, record keeping, and duty of care are likely to come under increasing scrutiny as calls grow for accountability and systemic reform.

𝐈𝐟 𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐧 𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐚 𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐞, 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐀𝐫𝐞𝐧’𝐭 𝐎𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐃𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐚𝐦𝐞? Kitty Holland reports in today’s Irish Times that in the case of multiple High Court hearings involving highly vulnerable children who remain without court ordered secure care placements, a significant and unusual step was taken by the court. Judge John Jordan lifted the in camera rule in several of these cases, allowing for the initiation of plenary proceedings against Tusla for alleged contempt of court. This marks a critical shift from the traditionally private nature of child care proceedings into the realm of potential public legal accountability. By permitting these actions to proceed beyond strict confidentiality, the court has opened the door to direct legal scrutiny of Tusla’s failure to comply with its own orders to protect children, signalling the seriousness of the breaches and the potential for far reaching consequences.

𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭 𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐚 𝐃𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐞𝐱𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐞 A report by Ann Murphy in today’s Irish Examiner outlines the establishment of a specialist unit within the Garda Ombudsman, Fiosrú, to investigate complaints involving domestic and sexual abuse linked to members of An Garda Síochána. The newly created “specialist services unit” has been tasked with examining a range of serious allegations, including domestic violence, coercive control, sexual assault, child sexual abuse, and the abuse of power for sexual purposes by gardaí. It will also investigate complaints where it is alleged that gardaí failed to properly investigate such incidents. The move is understood to follow growing concern about the handling of these cases, including the conviction of Garda Trevor Bolger, who last year pleaded guilty to assaulting his then wife in 2012. He received a fully suspended three month sentence earlier this year. The scale of the issue is underscored by figures disclosed by Garda Commissioner Justin Kelly, which show that 17 gardaí are currently suspended due to complaints relating to domestic violence and coercive control, with a further 10 suspended over allegations of sexual assault or misconduct. The creation of the unit has been cautiously welcomed by victims and campaigners. Margaret Loftus, who was the victim in the Bolger case, described it as “progress”, noting that concerns about how such cases have been handled have persisted for many years. The report also highlights ongoing concerns about how allegations of domestic abuse are investigated, particularly in complex cases involving counter allegations. One woman, whose complaint has been deemed admissible by Fiosrú, claims that she has been repeatedly arrested on foot of complaints made by her husband, whom she alleges was coercively controlling her. According to her complaint, her husband has used domestic violence orders as a means of control and harassment, and she alleges that this behaviour has been facilitated by the response of gardaí. Her case is one of several raised in recent weeks by women questioning the adequacy and fairness of Garda handling of domestic abuse complaints. Two additional cases from the Cork area have also been deemed admissible, indicating a broader pattern of concern around the policing of domestic and gender based violence. In a further development, former Dublin Rape Crisis Centre chief executive Noeline Blackwell has been appointed as an expert adviser to Fiosrú on domestic, sexual and gender based violence, signalling an effort to strengthen oversight and expertise in this area. Police Ombudsman Emily Logan emphasised that the role of Fiosrú is not only to investigate individual complaints but also to improve the overall safety of victims and the quality of policing responses. This includes examining both allegations against gardaí as perpetrators and complaints regarding failures in how incidents of abuse are handled. The establishment of the specialist unit represents a significant step in oversight and accountability. However, the cases highlighted in the report point to ongoing concerns about systemic responses to domestic abuse and the need for consistent, victim centred policing practices.

𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐎𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐬 ‘𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝’ 𝐭𝐨 𝐌𝐚𝐣𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬, 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐬 Kitty Holland reports in today’s Irish Times that Tusla is facing what a High Court judge has described as “extraordinary” legal exposure arising from its repeated failure to comply with court orders designed to protect some of the State’s most vulnerable children. Mr Justice John Jordan warned that the Child and Family Agency may face significant future compensation claims from children harmed as a direct consequence of its inability to provide secure care placements, despite having obtained court orders mandating such protection. The court heard that seven high risk children, all deemed in urgent need of detention in special care, remain without beds. Only 15 of the State’s 26 special care beds are currently operational due to severe staffing shortages. The consequences of this failure were stark. In one case, a teenager ordered into special care was sexually abused in the community because the placement had not been secured. The judge described it as “quite extraordinary” that an agency charged with protecting children is not going as far as it is obliged by statute to secure their safety. In another case, a child was self harming, misusing alcohol and facing criminal charges, with multi agency efforts focused simply on “keeping [the child] alive”. Judge Jordan warned that Tusla’s failure to comply with its own court orders leaves it dangerously exposed to future litigation. “The exposure of [Tusla]… is extraordinary,” he said, adding that “the mind boggles” as to why the agency is not taking the necessary steps to fulfil its obligations. He further warned of the long term consequences, stating that children who survive may later seek accountability: “I do not know what answer there is… to them turning around to [Tusla] and saying: ‘Look what you caused to me because you did not comply with the court order you obtained.’” The court also heard of further children now subject to special care orders. One vulnerable teenager is involved in serious drug misuse and is being groomed by criminal networks. Another is in a “very precarious position”, engaged in daily drug use, theft and dangerous driving, while expressing suicidal ideation. A third has experienced homelessness alongside parental substance abuse and domestic violence. In several cases, the judge lifted the in camera rule to allow plenary proceedings against Tusla for alleged contempt of court, signalling a significant escalation and opening the door to direct legal challenges. The proceedings point to a deepening systemic crisis within Ireland’s child protection system, where the State is failing to operationalise even existing capacity. Judge Jordan expressed little confidence in immediate improvement, noting he had “no cause for optimism”. The implications are profound. Beyond the immediate harm to children, the court’s findings point to a looming wave of legal accountability that may force a reckoning with structural failures at the heart of the State’s child protection system. #tusla #ireland

𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐚𝐠𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐝 𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐥𝐨𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐥𝐮𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐟 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐓𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐚 A High Court judge, John Jordan has warned that Tusla is now “extraordinarily exposed” to significant future compensation claims arising from its failure to provide court-ordered secure care to vulnerable children. Despite obtaining special care orders intended to protect life and safety, the agency has repeatedly failed to comply, leaving children exposed to serious harm, including sexual exploitation, self-harm, addiction, and criminal grooming. Judge Jordan made clear that these failures are not merely administrative but are likely to have “profound repercussions”, with affected children expected to pursue legal redress for the harm caused. In some cases, steps are already being taken toward legal proceedings against Tusla for contempt of court, underscoring the growing legal and financial risk to the State.



