MO Education Watch

16.6K posts

MO Education Watch banner
MO Education Watch

MO Education Watch

@MOEdWatch

Tracking Missouri Education Policy. Contributing to Local Control MO Substack and @armorvine

Missouri, USA Katılım Aralık 2022
2.4K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
🧵1/ “School Choice” United Nations (UNESCO) SDG4. Using Non-State Actors to move all education to a “single system.” What is a non-state actor?
MO Education Watch tweet media
English
23
99
126
54K
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
Patrick is with the Show Me Institute. They have been trying to get rid of Hancock protections forever. #moleg Conservatives, this isn't just an income tax reduction, it is an unconstitutional attack on the protections for the people of Missouri passed in 1980, 1996, and 2016.
MO Education Watch tweet media
Patrick Tuohey, GED@PatrickTuohey

Good news! Those opposed to the elimination of the Missouri income tax are able to protest by sending what they would have paid to: Missouri State Treasurer’s Office P.O. Box 210 Jefferson City, MO 65102 It's a win-win! #moleg

English
0
5
7
232
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
@MOHouseGOP Did you all seriously just pass a work around of the people? Did you remove current MO Constitutional protections in Article X, Sections 18 & 26 that give people the right to vote on new sources of tax revenue in Missouri? Wow! Where are the #moleg conservatives?
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch

1/ "Broadening the base" - Speaker Patterson They want you to think that new "sources" of tax revenue is not the same thing as raising the sales tax rate. A technicality they are abusing. That new sources of revenue is not the same thing as raising the sales tax. Which is true.

English
0
1
2
105
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
They left out of their #moleg propaganda reel that they just passed a HJR out if the House Chamber that removes Missouri Constitutional protections for 3 years set out in Article X, sections 18 & 26 that gives the people the right to vote on new sources of tax revenue.
Missouri House Republicans@MOHouseGOP

Highlight Reel - House Joint Resolutions 173 & 174, sponsored by Speaker Jon Patterson and Rep. Bishop Davidson, have been third read and passed the House. This legislation is now on it's way to the Senate. #TaxReform

English
0
1
3
139
Missouri House Republicans
Missouri House Republicans@MOHouseGOP·
Highlight Reel - House Joint Resolutions 173 & 174, sponsored by Speaker Jon Patterson and Rep. Bishop Davidson, have been third read and passed the House. This legislation is now on it's way to the Senate. #TaxReform
English
3
3
15
620
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
3/ And after that 3 year window of them creating new sources of tax revenue closes, anything that was created during that 3 year time period can't be changed unless it's taken back to a vote of the people. If #moleg wants to play the word salad game, we will play it right back.
MO Education Watch tweet media
English
0
3
5
108
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
2/ Plus, they are defining these new "sources" of revenue as "not new revenue" in HJR so it can't be held to MO Constitution Article X, Section 18 & 26 for 3 years while #moleg can create new sources of taxes on any goods and services currently not taxed. A work around.
English
1
3
3
128
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
1/ "Broadening the base" - Speaker Patterson They want you to think that new "sources" of tax revenue is not the same thing as raising the sales tax rate. A technicality they are abusing. That new sources of revenue is not the same thing as raising the sales tax. Which is true.
English
1
3
5
395
MO Education Watch retweetledi
Act for Missouri
Act for Missouri@ActforMissouri·
You have probably heard people talking about “Prop C” in Missouri school funding debates. But what is it really? Prop C is more than just a tax for education. It affects school funding, local property tax levies, rollback waivers, and how the state talks about education spending. If you want a clearer picture of what Prop C is and why it matters, read this: new-site.act4mo.org/posts/prop-c.h… #moleg #actformissouri
English
0
3
5
249
MO Education Watch retweetledi
Erin for Parental Rights
Erin for Parental Rights@Erin4Parents·
🔥 HUGE NEWS 🔥 All 3 @ProtectKidsCO measures are officially ON THE BALLOT! 🗳️ # 108: The Children Are Not For Sale Act # 109: The Protect Girls’ Sports Act # 110: The Protect Kids from Irreversible Sex-Rejecting Surgeries Act This didn’t happen because it was easy — it happened because YOU showed up. 💪🏻 To every volunteer who was part of this truly massive grassroots effort… THANK YOU. 🙏 You made history. People from every walk of life stepped up, sacrificed, and continue to fight for what matters. And because of ALL of you, the people will have a voice. #ProtectKidsColorado #OnTheBallot #Grassroots
English
168
652
2.9K
238.9K
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
It is WILD Rudy Veit is a voice of reason on the HJR 173/174 Income Tax resolution that takes away constitutional protections that the people currently benefit from that was passed in 1996, 2016 to expand on the 1980 Hancock Amendment. #moleg podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/wak…
English
0
4
5
175
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
This was clearly stated in the hearing on the bill. We will not be lied to. Understand that this removes important constitutional protections and lets #moleg go wild on creating new sources of sales tax to "broaden the base" as they also say in the same hearing.
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch

The summary filed with the HJR says that protections carved out in Article X, Section 18 and 26 are removed for 3 years. This is not a lie. What conservative removes these protections passed in 1996 & 2016 to expand Hancock 1980? #moleg

English
0
3
4
252
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
The summary filed with the HJR says that protections carved out in Article X, Section 18 and 26 are removed for 3 years. This is not a lie. What conservative removes these protections passed in 1996 & 2016 to expand Hancock 1980? #moleg
MO Education Watch tweet mediaMO Education Watch tweet mediaMO Education Watch tweet mediaMO Education Watch tweet media
97.1 FM Talk@971FMTalk

Marc Cox Morning Show 3-16-26: Happy Monday! @MarcCox971 & @StOnge_Kim welcome @hvonspakovsky @Carl_Bearden @OFallonPolice @Ackerman1120 & more w/ @Susan6768 and @DrewYoungRadio x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

English
0
0
1
352
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
These are the same others of the failed Kansas Experiment. These are the "experts" that are spoon feeding talking points to the Missouri #moleg reps. We are cooked in Missouri if this is who is influencing tax policy like HJR 173/174.
MO Education Watch tweet mediaMO Education Watch tweet mediaMO Education Watch tweet media
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch

#moleg HJR 173/174 Income Tax scam is based on the geriatric politic groups decades old failed tax policies like ALEC and their authors of Rich States, Poor States. Check out their Missouri plan for "tax swapping" 🤣🤣🤣 Jeff City is filled with swappers I hear...

English
1
2
6
337
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
#moleg HJR 173/174 Income Tax scam is based on the geriatric politic groups decades old failed tax policies like ALEC and their authors of Rich States, Poor States. Check out their Missouri plan for "tax swapping" 🤣🤣🤣 Jeff City is filled with swappers I hear...
MO Education Watch tweet mediaMO Education Watch tweet mediaMO Education Watch tweet mediaMO Education Watch tweet media
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch

@mama_aries2 Here are the services their ALEC handlers recommend going after.

English
0
4
8
460
Aries_Mama
Aries_Mama@mama_aries2·
@MOEdWatch We need to move to a consumption tax, nothing else will be ok. Seniors shouldn't have to pay more for their budgeted hair care or any other service. I will not give my vote to anything else.
English
1
0
0
19
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
1/ #moleg Missouri House Chamber passed HJR 173/174. It is sold as reducing the state Income Tax. It moves to Senate next, & if passes both Chambers, it goes to the vote of the people. There are many questions/concerns. This one jumps out right away. If passed...
MO Education Watch tweet media
English
3
2
4
329
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
@Cheri_Angel1 Yes, please just keep having the conversations. I think not only are the politicians easily manipulated, leadership knows exactly what they're doing and are not being kind to the people.
English
3
0
1
20
ACE
ACE@Cheri_Angel1·
@MOEdWatch I've had conversations with people in my front yard , people are realizing that this is a bad bill ,they already said they will not be voting for it. At first it sounds good, until people dot the math Lol Are politicians really believe the people are stupid in this state
English
2
0
1
23
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
3/ During those 3 years, the protections in MO Constitution, Article X, Section 26, would be overridden, leaving the #moleg to pass whatever they want without those protections for the people. For 3 years! "Withstanding any provision of this Constitution to the contrary"
English
0
1
3
141
MO Education Watch
MO Education Watch@MOEdWatch·
2/ House Rep Bishop Davidson's HJR 173 gives an override of current protections in Missouri State Constitution, Article X, that were voted in by the people in 2016 in addition to 1980 Hancock Amendment. The override is for 3 years!
MO Education Watch tweet media
English
2
2
2
111