M.O.R.E Trading

1.3K posts

M.O.R.E Trading banner
M.O.R.E Trading

M.O.R.E Trading

@MORE_Trading_AM

Aspiring FT price action trader | SPX + select equities | Early PLTR / ONDS| Macro HotTakes | Find out what: Mastering Opportunities and Readiness Everyday

State College, PA Katılım Haziran 2025
107 Takip Edilen122 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
🚀🔥 $ONDS Stock Projections if: • Underperforms Expectations: 😴 (<5%) 2yr: $7.75 5yr: $11.79 7yr: $15.59 10yr: $23.71 • Meets Expectations: 👍 (60%) 2yr: $8.16 5yr: $13.41 7yr: $18.67 10yr: $30.67 • Outperforms: 🌟 (25%) 2yr: $8.72 5yr: $15.84 7yr: $23.57 10yr: $42.81 • Exceeds: 🔥🚀 (<10%) 2yr: $10.24 5yr: $23.64 7yr: $41.29 10yr: $95.34 Deep Dive below! My Favorite Part: Current Monthly Bull Trend Channel supports “Underperform Expectations” projections through 2035 Forecast. #MORE
M.O.R.E Trading tweet mediaM.O.R.E Trading tweet media
English
5
4
27
5.6K
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
#SPX #ES -Poor follow through on the Bull BO. -1 tick failure above last weeks high. Ut oh.
M.O.R.E Trading tweet media
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM

#SPX #ES Bulls taking their shot at the triangle breakout on Thur/Friday. Continued follow through from here and we test the ATH.

English
0
0
0
20
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
The answer was no.
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM

#ONDS • Wedge bottom forming near the end of a protracted bear channel • Another attempted bull breakout from the bear trendline into the close Is the reversal finally here? #MORE

English
0
0
0
25
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
@BMSInvests The issue with this post, atleast from my perspective- is it’s from the same guy that said ONDS would NEVER see these prices again. Now that his own foot in his mouth he wants to act like it’s all normal.
English
0
0
2
80
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
Today’s market summary:
GIF
English
0
0
0
32
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
@Kaaayjaay @toddtrades7 Yeah I could’ve chosen better wording. I don’t necessarily believe their main intent was/is to generate likes. I suppose I view it more as “always finding the bullish slant” to keep people coming back and looking for reassurance. Lots FOMOd in at highs. I blame permabulls.
English
0
0
2
29
Kayjay
Kayjay@Kaaayjaay·
@MORE_Trading_AM @toddtrades7 I totally get you. I don’t view the main $ONDS contributors as engagement farmers, and I appreciated their content, but then the tone changed. I took the posts personally, which was ridiculous and ego driven on my part. I’m a flawed human.
English
1
0
1
116
Kayjay
Kayjay@Kaaayjaay·
Interesting posts by $ONDS bulls recently. Calling people out for not showing proof of their positions? Claiming there are only a select few bulls left? I don’t know…it’s kind of bummed me out. My share count is pretty important to me…my two dogs, and possibly even the stray I took in this morning. (I’ve already named him Jasper. 🥰) But that’s it. No human cares what I do with my money. I think I’m holding a pretty sweet amount of shares. And I am DEEP in the red today. But it’s all good because it was the same game in Jan 25, and I just kept buying and buying. All the way down. Be cool to the community. It’s vast. It’s loud. And it’s also QUIET. Maybe we all don’t post a lot, but we are here—feeling the pain together.
GIF
English
12
1
55
5.3K
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
Failed Breakouts all over the board today #ONDS #MP Climactic sell and reversal ? Or Two legs lower?
English
1
0
1
117
Todd
Todd@toddtrades7·
@MORE_Trading_AM @Kaaayjaay Well, i guess we, because of how good you are, can just keep making money on the truth and not worry about the engagement farmers. No more noise.
English
1
0
1
36
Todd
Todd@toddtrades7·
@Kaaayjaay @MORE_Trading_AM is both a long term holder, analyzes the fundamentals and is probly one of the better TA (and transparent both directions) on ONDS, yet he gets 2 likes for great TA posts but those 5-6 bulls get 100 likes for saying “don’t worry, it’ll go up to $20-25 eoy!”
English
1
0
1
52
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
#ONDS • Wedge bottom forming near the end of a protracted bear channel • Another attempted bull breakout from the bear trendline into the close Is the reversal finally here? #MORE
M.O.R.E Trading tweet media
English
0
0
3
201
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
@YoYInvestor See how silly you look when you say things like we will never see *these* prices again because of “insert fundamental justification here?” The market does not care at all about those justifications. The price only goes higher when more people are willing to buy higher prices.
English
0
0
0
502
Sleuth 🔎
Sleuth 🔎@YoYInvestor·
$ONDS falls below $7. Based on my calculations, $ONDS is trading at less than 3.5x forward P/S and less than 2.5x forward EV/S for FY2027.
Sleuth 🔎 tweet media
English
12
16
179
25.8K
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
$ONDS Back in the 6’s… everyone check in on your favorite permabull that said we would NEVER see these prices again. #priceaction
English
0
1
1
162
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
#SPX #ES Bulls taking their shot at the triangle breakout on Thur/Friday. Continued follow through from here and we test the ATH.
M.O.R.E Trading tweet media
English
0
0
0
76
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
#ONDS Last add. Aiming for $6.70-6.80 support cluster. -20ema (1M) -Bull BO (1W)
M.O.R.E Trading tweet media
English
0
0
0
80
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
@moninvestor Spike to channel. Looks like it’s almost time for that 2nd leg higher.
English
1
0
1
124
mon
mon@moninvestor·
This is what my portfolio looks like. For a long time, it did absolutely nothing. That's something I want every new investor to understand because most people only see the end result. They see a portfolio that's up hundreds of percent, but they don't see the months, or even years, where nothing seemed to happen. At the start of 2025, all of my money was in just two companies: $HIMS and $IREN. I bought Hims in 2023 and IREN in 2024 with one goal in mind. I wasn't looking for a quick 20% or 30%. I was looking for businesses that I believed could return 10x over the next 5 to 10 years. That meant accepting long periods where my portfolio looked dead. I bought IREN around the middle of 2024. A few months later it traded around $15, then eventually fell back to around $5 (April 2025). I spent almost a year sitting on a position that was either flat or red. I didn't sell. I bought more because my thesis hadn't changed. The market had changed. The business hadn't. The same thing happened with Hims & Hers. There were plenty of opportunities to chase whatever stock was up 100% that year, but I stayed with the companies I understood. Eventually the market caught up. Hims went from around $6 to over $60. My first IREN shares also went from roughly $6 to around $60. By the end of 2025, my portfolio had gained more than 400% for the year. Warren Buffett has said Berkshire Hathaway fell roughly 50% three different times after he took control. His point was simple. Did the business suddenly become worth half as much? No. The stock price fell. The business kept growing. If you weren't using borrowed money and your thesis is still intact, then there's no reason to panic. That's how I try to think about investing. Today everyone is focused on IREN's share price, the Warriors sponsorship (in a grand scheme of things, $50m deal is nothing), the executive compensation package and the lack of new AI deals. Some of those criticisms are fair. For example, I am not a fan of the compensation package. But none of that changes the reason I invested. It doesn't stop the company building data centres. It doesn't stop them securing more power. It doesn't stop them expanding toward almost 6 GW of secured power. It doesn't stop cloud capacity from coming online. I believe management is trying to maximise the value of long-term AI contracts rather than rushing to sign deals with weaker economics. We'll find out over the next couple of years whether that decision was right or wrong. The same applies to the founders' compensation. I don't agree with how generous it is, but the structure also tells me they're thinking about where this business could be in 2030 and beyond, not where the share price is next month. As long-term investors, that's the timeframe we should be thinking about too. Maybe my portfolio doesn't do much this year. Maybe it spends another year moving sideways. I've seen that before. Sometimes your portfolio can look boring for months or years, then one or two investments completely change everything. That's why I focus on the businesses, not the day-to-day share price. Over the long run, the value of the business is what matters. The market eventually catches up.
mon tweet media
English
12
12
179
25.8K
M.O.R.E Trading retweetledi
Jamie Bonkiewicz
Jamie Bonkiewicz@JamieBonkiewicz·
Republicans literally elected a convicted rapist and pedophile to the White House.
Jamie Bonkiewicz tweet media
English
107
440
2.3K
93.3K
Sleuth 🔎
Sleuth 🔎@YoYInvestor·
I can appreciate this analysis by @fundmyfund, but it is incomplete. If you are going to include the warrants, you should model the higher market capitalization as the stock would be over 4x higher when exercised. It is important to recognize the business and revenue expansion when $ONDS receives $4.9B in fresh capital. That should also give $ONDS around $10B of investment capacity to expand the business further assuming an even split between equity and cash. It is unclear to me why one would factor in warrants, but not the subsequently higher share price. If you don’t do this, the analysis is incomplete. I believe the commentary on the warrant overhang being solely “future dilution” is also myopic. You also must address and value what the business receives as a result of warrant exercise and what the investors get from a higher share price. I am of the opinion that the 2027 revenue estimate is too low, and I disagree that software defined platforms/category leaders with strong margins should be capped at 12x revenue. Only factoring in one side of the warrants is not a comprehensive outlook.
Fund.Biotech.CyberSecurity $UMAC $LPTH 🐋@fundmyfund

New $ONDS financial model post DZYNE acquisition - plus 2027 revenue first pass 🎯 ------------ DZYNE is a hyuge acquisition! $300M in revenue for 2027 which will be the first full year under the Ondas umbrella Due to acquisitive nature of the company I always put more revenue in my model then what they guide. They were at $390M for 2026 last go around so I went with $475M in my model. The company has now guided to $525M so I will still go above that but we are running out of year now that we are in July so I am going to go with $550M. Even with MOAR acquisitions coming there is only so much revenue they can stuff into 2026 as it takes time for an acquisition to close and start contributing to the top line. Perhaps they get some ancillary revenue from Cyberhawk. Or just some organic growth. -------------- 💎NEXT YEAR I have begun 2027 at $850M in revenue. DZYNE alone is $300M in theory so this should be easily beaten considering we can assume another 3-5-7 acquisitions, who knows. Eric like buying things. This could get to $1B by the time we have this discussion Labor Day 2027 but I want to start reasonable and work my way up. --------------- 🔢SHARE COUNT Always the tough one with $ONDS - only company I have 2 separate line items for shares outstanding. Last go around was 493M in my notes for shares out in the world - Grok says the fully dilute with warrants is just under 700M. So to do valuation correctly we should be looking at all future liabilities which is the larger #. By the time we get to end of 2027 I would expect both these numbers to be up substantially because that is the Ondas way. Total guesswork here since there is a lot of dilution to come but I went with 580M shares by end of 2027 and 780M shares filly diluted. THESE ARE GUESSES. Especially the latter - are they done with MOAR warrants and MOAR long term liabilities hoisted on the stock? We will see. --------------- 🤔"But it's so CHEAP and so much MOAR revenue then why doesn't the stonk go up???" "Why" isn't that important to me from a technical analysis perspective. "What" is. Growth is out of style, drone is out of style - that's the what. If I did care about why some opinions that could be totally wrong: a) When a stock runs 2500-3000% in a year, you need to absorb and consolidate that. It takes time. It can take many quarters if not a year plus. b) That warrant overhang. I was very confused to see all the clapping last year on this site about the warrants as if $28 (? I think was the price) meant institutions thought it was headed to $28 so buy buy buy. It's a future liability and more dilution down the road when price targets are hit - that's the bottom line. Anyhow, I digress. Opinions don't matter - price matters. -------------- 💸FINANCIAL MODEL For the first time since I began watching this stock in early 2025 (and should have bought in on the crash spring/summer 2025 in retrospect) the company is not only fairly valued go forward but a tad 'cheap' ;) I like to use 12x forward price to sales so on 2026 revenue the non diluted upside is 80%. That sounds great but you have to put all those future warrants in so its more like 30%. Still this is positive finally vs being negative in my model. That translates to a PPS in the $13s and $9s respectively. For 2027 it is +140% and +80% respectively if my revenue is anywhere near accurate (my guess is Ondas beats my revenue with more acquisitions) and my share counts are accurate (no one really knows there are so many shares) That would be $17s and $13s respectively. Up until 3 months ago the company was grossly overvalued on this model since I began watching it That did NOT stop the company from having an amazing 2025. My model does not mean the stonk cannot be $28 PPS next year or $50 or $100. It's a model. The model is just 1 piece of the puzzle. The chart is the other (first comment below) I have a small 2028 LEAP position on this name

English
4
3
61
7.3K
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
#ONDS DZYNE Grasshopper: 500 lb autonomous cargo glider ~$40k each, air-dropped from C-130s/C-27s to denied areas. Long-Range turbine is operational in EUCOM. Cheap, scalable, and built for the fight. Contested logistics solved the attritable way. 🚀
M.O.R.E Trading tweet media
English
0
1
4
177
M.O.R.E Trading
M.O.R.E Trading@MORE_Trading_AM·
#ONDS The 🌊 are shifting. One last flush first? That $10.99 PT is giving 1099-B vibes. #MORE Let’s go
M.O.R.E Trading tweet media
English
0
0
0
85