Николай Никоноров

@elonmusk Это твоя биография или план?

promt: "cinematic romantic scene, couple walking through extremely shallow crystal clear ocean water at sunset, water perfectly calm and reflective so it looks like they are walking on water and clouds, camera placed very low at water level near their feet, gentle ripples around footsteps, sky reflections blending with clouds beneath them, dreamy atmosphere, soft golden light, realistic movement, photorealistic, shallow depth of field, tropical horizon in distance, 16:9" @elonmusk @xai @grok Censorship in Grok is fucking annoying. Perhaps censorship is necessary, although it is prohibited by many constitutions around the world, leaving the responsibility for what one does or does not do to the individual's conscience. And it is prohibited because when it exists and is controlled by some brainless and cowardly creature, it and it block the freedom of human self-realization. Moderation in Grok says it's blocking video creation? What's wrong with it?

@askaya Тоесть ты себя называешь нацисткой?

A picture of a Russian Nazi in her natural habitat: naturemaxxing What’s your fav way to lower cortisol levels?

@brivael That is, you are asking to invent a bicycle under the title "Kapital" by Karl Marx

Elon Musk avait dit un truc qui m'avait marqué sur l'allocation de ressources. En substance : passé un certain niveau de richesse, l'argent n'est plus de la consommation, c'est de l'allocation de capital. Cette phrase change tout. L'économie, dans le fond, c'est juste un problème d'allocation. Tu as des ressources finies et des usages infinis. Qui décide où va quoi ? Imagine une cour de récré. 100 enfants, des paquets de cartes Pokémon distribués au hasard. Tu laisses faire. Très vite, un ordre émerge. Les bons joueurs accumulent les cartes rares, les collectionneurs trient, les négociateurs trouvent des deals. Personne n'a planifié. Et pourtant chaque carte finit dans les mains de celui qui en tire le plus de valeur. Le système maximise le bonheur total de la cour. C'est ça, la main invisible. Maintenant fais entrer la maîtresse. Elle trouve ça injuste. Léo a 50 cartes, Tom en a 3. Elle confisque, redistribue, impose l'égalité. Trois effets immédiats. Les bons joueurs arrêtent de jouer, à quoi bon. Les mauvais n'ont plus de raison de progresser, ils auront leur part. Les échanges s'effondrent. La cour est égale, et morte. Elle a maximisé l'égalité, elle a détruit le bonheur. Le problème de la maîtresse, c'est qu'elle ne peut pas avoir l'information que la cour avait collectivement. C'est le problème du calcul économique de Mises, formulé en 1920. L'URSS a essayé de le résoudre pendant 70 ans avec le Gosplan. Résultat : pénuries, queues, effondrement. Pas parce que les Soviétiques étaient bêtes, parce que le problème est mathématiquement insoluble en mode centralisé. Quand Musk a 200 milliards, il ne les consomme pas, il les alloue. SpaceX, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI. Chaque dollar est un pari sur le futur. Et lui a un track record. PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX. Il a démontré qu'il sait identifier des problèmes immenses et y allouer des ressources avec un rendement spectaculaire. L'État aussi a un track record. Hôpitaux qui s'effondrent, éducation qui décline, dette qui explose, services publics qui se dégradent malgré des budgets en hausse constante. Le marché identifie les bons allocateurs, la politique identifie les bons communicants. Le profit n'est pas une finalité, c'est un signal. Il dit : tu as alloué des ressources rares vers un usage que les gens valorisent suffisamment pour payer. Plus le profit est gros, plus la création de valeur est grande. Quand Starlink est rentable, ça veut dire que des millions de gens dans des zones rurales ont enfin internet. Quand un ministère est en déficit, ça veut dire qu'il consomme plus qu'il ne produit. L'un crée, l'autre détruit, et on appelle ça redistribution. Dans nos sociétés il y a deux catégories d'acteurs. Les entrepreneurs et les bureaucrates. L'entrepreneur prend un risque personnel pour identifier un problème, mobiliser des ressources, créer une solution. S'il se trompe il perd. S'il a raison, ses clients gagnent, ses employés gagnent, ses fournisseurs gagnent, l'État collecte des impôts. Il est la cellule de base du progrès humain. Le bureaucrate ne prend aucun risque personnel. Son salaire est garanti. Au mieux il maintient une rente existante. Au pire il la détruit par excès de réglementation, mauvaise allocation forcée, incitations perverses qui découragent ceux qui produisent. Mais dans aucun cas il ne crée. Regarde les 50 dernières années. iPhone, internet civil, SpaceX, Tesla, Google, Amazon, Stripe, mRNA, ChatGPT. Toutes des inventions privées, portées par des entrepreneurs, financées par du capital risque. Pas un seul ministère n'a inventé quoi que ce soit qui ait changé ta vie au quotidien. La France est devenue le laboratoire mondial de la dérive bureaucratique. 57% du PIB en dépenses publiques, record absolu. Une administration tentaculaire, une fiscalité qui pénalise la création de richesse. Résultat : décrochage face aux États-Unis, à l'Allemagne, à la Suisse. Fuite des cerveaux. Désindustrialisation. Dette qui explose. Et le pire c'est que la mauvaise allocation s'auto-renforce. Plus l'État prélève, moins les entrepreneurs créent. Moins ils créent, moins il y a de base fiscale. Plus l'État s'endette et taxe. Boucle de rétroaction négative parfaite. La maîtresse pense qu'elle aide, et chaque année la cour produit moins. Dans nos sociétés, ce sont les entrepreneurs, toujours, qui font avancer la civilisation. Les bureaucrates au mieux maintiennent une rente, au pire la détruisent. Aucune société n'a jamais progressé en taxant ses créateurs pour subventionner ses gestionnaires. La question n'est jamais qui a combien. C'est qui alloue le mieux la prochaine unité de ressource pour maximiser le futur de l'humanité. La réponse depuis 200 ans n'a jamais changé. Ce ne sont pas les fonctionnaires.

@dvorahfr @nikitabier algorithms treat accounts that block badly, but how does he treat bots? it's terrible that we spend our attention and time not opening the door to a person who knocks on us with their hope in the future

It seems that I am being infested by a multitude of bots with no followers and no profile. Should I block them one by one? But I read that accounts that block many other accounts are frowned upon by the algorithm. Is that true? What's the best way to proceed? Please @nikitabier @elonmusk what should I do?

You never want to hear obvious answers to the questions you ask! You sometimes claim that "black lives matter" and sometimes that "white lives matter," but the problem is that "LIVES MATTER," regardless of color, religion, social or cultural status. Crimes aren't committed by black or white people, but by criminals. And yet you keep trying to reinvent the wheel, riding a rocket ship straight to hell.

Good question

@elonmusk It's impossible to prove anything to either Musk or those people on stage. Meanwhile, both are wrong.

They are calling for the genocide of Whites

@askaya картинка похоже сделана чат GPT- так?

How 𝕏 feels right now and I’m here for it

What's the reason for this stereotype about Russian girls being so beautiful? Well, you know, Swedish girls are also very beautiful. But perhaps beauty is about freedom. When people freely choose their partners, when they raise their children with love and respect for themselves and others. That's where beauty comes from. And we mustn't forget that external beauty without internal beauty is more likely to evoke sadness than affection.

This is true. To be considered beautiful in Russia, you have to be VERY beautiful. The standards are different there. 4-5s are usually not delusional like they are here in the U.S.

@askaya Сорян, был вопрос откуда а не кто. Територии Украины, России и Польши в разных вариациях и комбинациях

@askaya Мои предки люди. Да и сам я такой-же.

EMBRACE YOUR WHITENESS. What European countries are your ancestors from??

Could those who stumbled here by chance write whether they knew that the abbreviation "USSR" is actually incorrect because it's "Soviet"—it carries meaning in the languages ​​of the participating countries, but carries absolutely no semantic load, merely a label for Westerners. If you ask any Westerner what this word means, they might only point out that it's a proper noun referring to a regime. The question isn't whether it's good or bad. The funny thing is, this definition originated with the West, but rather with internal incompetence. In short, the true meaning of the meaningful translation is "Union of Council-Based Socialist Republics." Why am I interested in this topic? Well, I'm involved in ontological research, and it doesn't allow for ambiguous or vague names. For example, Euclidean geometry has a definition of a point, but I'm not satisfied with it, so I found the true definition of a point. And soon it will appear in the article: "The Mathematics of the Topology of the Universe." You can subscribe if you are interested and can understand what I wrote in this post. Thank you for your attention.

You guys have a strange way of measuring wealth. In the real world, things are much different. Ukraine, for example, is one of the countries that has rapidly shifted from a socially oriented to a capitalist-feudal one. Are you trying to claim that war alone is to blame for poverty? You're wrong. Foreign "investors" sponsored corruption to create monopolies, and the stolen money was used by other governments to spend. So, if a Ukrainian citizen comes to the EU and tries to buy a car, bringing perfectly legal money, you can bet they'll have a number of difficulties. For example, Ukrainian oligarchs freely buy up real estate and expensive trinkets without any problems. But the truth is that if life has gotten better in some places, you can be sure it's because life has gotten significantly worse in others, and that's capitalism.

Yes

It's an instrument, like a piano: if someone can't play it, then without someone who can, they'll never be able to appreciate how good it is. A blade in the hand can save lives, or it can do the opposite. But attributing to an instrument lacking motivation the properties inherent in those whose motivation is the only way to survive as an individual and a species is, at the very least, incorrect.

No. Had to stop video. A.I.'s suck at language. They suck at creativity. They excel at processing and regurgitation. Parroting. Mimicry. It's human limitation that fools us occasionally into thinking otherwise. Don't get me wrong. It has great utility. Like a calculator cubed. It's amazing at doing busiwork that machines are great at doing. It lacks our ego, and because so, will solve many problems obstructed by human ego. Our ego though makes us creative.

Grok will never go to therapy. Never.

Both sound plausible in their style, but neither is real. It's a popular aesthetic meme, not accurate literary content.The image contains two fake quotes (misattributions).Kafka: “I ran from love because I knew it would destroy me.” → Not said by Kafka. Dostoevsky: “I ran into love because I needed it to destroy who I used to be.” → Not said by Dostoevsky.

С тех пор как правит нами жалкий плут, Закрыт засов и свищет кнут, Жесток в своём предательстве паяц, И это лишь один о нём абзац, Он обещал- всё выполнить того чего желали сами мы, Но правда эта выполнится может только честными руками Теперь надеты кандалы, и на друг друга нападаем мы А мы все ждем, когда за нас, исполнит кто-то то что сделать можем только сами. И в дым вся превращается история Глупцы кричат шуту: «Виват! Виват! Виктория!» И славы, славы! требует толпа зевак Поставив на себя, забытого Иисуса знак.

When you're 23 years old and live in Ukraine.

Creating expressive art with AI tools is still a brutal battle against glitches. With immense persistence, AI assistants leave their own marks on the creator's process, yet they might envy the stubbornness of those who still dismiss this as a mere toy or "fake" creativity. If that is what you believe, then for you, it is so. I don't mind if you worship drug-addled idols with bloated egos; that is your choice—conscious or not. It is yours. But I am free. Free from your recognition and the need for it. And if you like what I do—then watch and listen.

Pre-save my new single "The Shift" on Spotify: distrokid.com/hyperfollow/ms… (powered by @distrokid)