ReCapitalist
53 posts


Gym goers: what’s one exercise you refuse to do, no matter how much people hype it up?


@luckychartape KILL ALL PAID GROUPS





Tomorrow remains a powerful time confluence, but both price, and time, must be aligned for it to be an effective trade. If the current high holds ($76k), tomorrow is significant as a LH, otherwise it is swept and we look at our next level, which in this current time is my favourite scenario. For this reason of disposition with time and spacing, this new updated perspective is my new favourite positioning. I am still in longs from first entries notably from $62.5k BTC, and locally scalping partials at local lows, highs in the uptrend/ranging, and still holding positions in a good few alt coins from their bottom retests, full out's on these will be when this arrives 🧲. My favourite current scenario is a high pivot on April 22nd, looking at the shown POI on $ETH for another round of powerful🔨 around $2.5k-$2.6k as well a $83.7k $BTC on the date of the 22nd. This should align with a 12% $STABLES.C.D. If those stars align. 🌟 And monitor tomorrow. ₿rave.









@ElFacundoARG @SimonDixonTwitt @xueqinjiang Because btc doesn't produce anything or increase overall GDP, the increase in btc price is paid for by the purchasing power of new users alone. That and the massive opportunity cost caused by the mining, means it's a net negative for society. Basically the worlds biggest ponzi


💰 DEVELOPING STORY – If you’re wondering why the accounts @Doomerzoomer and @higgsfield got banned, here is the whole story: I was invited into a private Telegram group. I’m usually very hesitant with paid promotions and I rarely trust setups like this, but I joined anyway to understand what was going on. What I found was not organic support or independent creators sharing tools they liked. It was a coordinated system. Inside the group that was run by @Doomerzoomer, creators were given exact instructions. What to post, which words to use, what to retweet and when. There were external briefs that linked directly to the companies’ websites, basically telling people how to frame their opinions. The process was as follows: You filled out a Google form with your X handle, the link to the post, and the agreed payment. Then you submitted it and were promised of being paid within a week. I never got to the payment part and here is why: After a few days of collecting evidence, I stopped. Because it became clear this was not just aggressive marketing. It was literally a scam. Two examples: – Perplexity AI was pushing influencers to avoid disclosing that posts were paid. – Higgsfield told people disclosure was optional. That’s deliberate platform manipulation. This had been running for months. There were around 150 large creators in that group, all being directed on what to post. In private chats, @Doomerzoomer would tell people what to say and not to say publicly. He told me, for instance, to stop talking about Israel. A huge red flag imho. Benjamin’s mistake was that he contacted me via his private phone number. As a white-hat hacker, I was able to identify the person behind it. His name is Benjamin S., a Chinese individual living in New Zealand. From there, more pieces came together. Old data traces, profiles, behavior patterns. Even things like him cheating on chess dot com, which says a lot about character. The arrogance in his messages matched exactly what I found. It painted a very clear picture of the kind of person operating this system. In the middle of it all (between companies and the creators), Ben acted as a single coordinator and gatekeeper. He recruited creators, controlled the flow of information, and based on everything I could verify, positioned himself to take a significant cut (7 digits per month) while keeping the creator side unclear about how the money actually moved. – Payment rates were inconsistent. – Stories did not match. – Nothing about it was transparent. Many of the creators involved were making between $15,000 and $50,000 PER MONTH from these campaigns alone. Doomer most likely made 50% of each payment on top as a “one person agency.” Do the math. I understand why some of the creators are upset with me now. And I’m sorry. I could have stayed quiet. I could have played along. I could have taken the money. BUT I DIDN’T. Because if platforms like this are going to mean anything, they cannot turn into pay to play schemes disguised as real opinion. And it did not stop there. Ben kept pushing for more. More creators. More reach. More volume. There were even incentives to recruit additional people into the system to expand it further. The screenshots below show how that recruitment worked. At some point, you have to ask yourself how no one in that group felt like cattle. Because that is exactly what it felt like. Controlled messaging, controlled behavior, scaled and monetized. I want to be clear about one thing. There is nothing wrong with getting paid to post. But if you are getting paid, be honest about it. Say it openly. Do not disguise it as organic belief. Yesterday I contacted @higgsfield via email and asked them about their relationship with Benjamin S., the structure behind these campaigns, and the briefing material being distributed. They did not respond to my questions. Today, they got suspended. I also have their full briefing texts saved. In the long run, honesty wins.



$BTC [update V4] Aggressive push up with no bearish MS confirmation = no trade. No need to overcomplicate it. If this supply was going to deliver a rejection it should have done it from the lower part of the supply, personally expecting price to search for buyside higher so remaining patient.


My most uncharitable belief is that if you're chronically late to things, you're just a bad person. And I mean I don't think it's possible to routinely be late to events/work/appointments *unless* you're just a selfish person with no concern for anyone else.



Actress and comedian Nikki Glaser admits she has a cuck fetish and enjoys letting her boyfriend cheat on her with other women 💀🤔👀 “It makes me h*rny to think about him doing things with other girls”


Eating the same meals on repeat was associated with 40% greater weight loss.






