
MUST E CAT ZY
2K posts

MUST E CAT ZY
@MUSTECATZY1
So di non sapere;pensatore libero, liberale ma progressista;non sopporto i no qualche cosa, i cazzari, gli incompetenti soprattutto se pure arroganti.




Another day, another Chinese reactors starts operation (Taipingling Unit 2). It is another domestic Hualong One reactor. China's plants are taking only ~five years to build. Article link in reply. The goal is to have 110 GW of capacity by 2030. They would overtake the US and be the country with the most nuclear capacity. The Taipingling plant will eventually have six reactors, that will be built at a cost of only ~$18 billion! That's $3 billion for a ~1 GW reactor. The last US project (Vogtle) cost ~$16 billion per GW. More than that if you acount for inflation. The Vogtle project started construction over ten years ago. Reactors being built in Europe are even more expensive. One frustrating thing, pointed out by the article, is that China is still not allowing nuclear plants to be build in inland regions, "due to safety considerations." This policy is bizarre. Baseless. Countries around the world have inland nuclear plants, adjacent to rivers or lakes, etc.. Most US plants are inland. There are no tangible safety issues with using rivers, etc.. as a heat sink. And yet, China allows dirty COAL plants in inland regions. The health, and climare, effects are horrific! Coal plants also need water as a heat sink. Does China think that inland nuclear plants would be more dangerous and harmful than coal plants??!! Coal plants are known to be a thousand times as dangerous and harmful than nuclear plants. Even more so in China! Imagine how much China could achieve, in terms of nuclear deployment, without this baseless restriction! Imagine how much coal could be replaced. Imagine how much less pollution and CO2 emissions there would be. How many Chinese lives would be saved.. It's almost like they have this incredible ability to build nuclear plants in 5 years for a fraction of the cost, and they're throwing it away to a large extent. Is this more about lacking the skilled labor to build plants at a higher rate ("so we might as well build them in the "safer" coastal regions")?? All I can think of...














Jamie Dimon, amministratore delegato di JPMorgan critica le politiche fiscali del sindaco Mamdani: “Con l'aumento delle tasse sulle seconde case New York perderà i suoi contribuenti più ricchi che si trasferiranno altrove”. Dimon ha un patrimonio netto di 2,4 miliardi di dollari. Guadagna 350 milioni di dollari l’anno. Ha un appartamento da 240 milioni, nella grande mela, altri 40 nel mondo. Ha incassato 3mila dollari solo nel tempo che serve per leggere questo tweet. Caro Jamie, paga: paga senza neanche fiatare.
























