Matthew

13.2K posts

Matthew

Matthew

@MWHoyle19

Sometime tutor in Law.

London Katılım Mayıs 2010
100 Takip Edilen796 Takipçiler
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
The suffragettes were just as, if not more violent than, PA. Not really consistent from the government to do this, and to erase the older and more popular suffragists who opposed the violence.
English
0
0
1
31
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
@Kush_P_T Re costs protections more broadly, the problem Dan has is that the claimant in his case is resident out of the UK, so it will likely be very hard to enforce against him, even with a substantial costs award from the summary dismissal.
English
1
0
0
14
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
@Kush_P_T It might help a little, but SfC applications themselves end up being expensive: whatever the first hurdle is, that is where an expense will bite. The only way you could do it cheaply is by requiring mandatory SfC in all cases, which would also be controversial.
English
1
0
0
15
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
@JRLevinsLaw The judicialisation of sport is such a good development. What happens on the pitch is secondary, its counsel's submissions that really matter.
English
1
0
4
68
JR Levins
JR Levins@JRLevinsLaw·
Given the resources of the parties and the importance of prompt investigations and decisions, these cases should be conducted as if they were in the Commercial Court. Much more transparency needed too. 2/2
English
2
1
6
479
JR Levins
JR Levins@JRLevinsLaw·
The quoted text refers to the Premier League's case against Man City. The general rule in the courts is that judgments should be delivered within three months, even in very complex cases. The weaknesses of the enforcement system are bringing the game into disrepute. 1/2
JR Levins tweet media
English
1
5
10
2.1K
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
@DanNeidle Even kicking a claim out at the first hurdle costs a fortune!
English
1
0
1
65
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
The reality is that in our system a determined claimant can inflict vast expense on a defendant with a baseless claim of any kind or indeed none.
English
2
0
3
40
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
The only productive mechanism I can think of is to require that any defamation action first obtain permission of a judge to proceed. But even then, we all know many cases which get ex parte permission yet fall flat at an inter partes hearing.
English
1
0
4
82
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
@LeahFHardy @mazst @TonyDowson5 Most people who abandon or kill their children after they are born are also desperate and in difficult circumstances. Should that be legalised too?
English
3
3
16
785
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
@LeahFHardy @mazst @TonyDowson5 Most people are doing something legal in respect of a non-viable foetus. Why should that mean killing a 36 week old viable baby with fraudulently obtained pills should be legal?
English
2
1
13
785
Tony Dowson
Tony Dowson@TonyDowson5·
"Desperate last resort" If there was a lawful means, it would be available. The last resort is deciding to take drastic measures resulting in a horrible death of a viable foetus.
Alonso Gurmendi@Alonso_GD

You can say “I think women who are denied an abortion and attempt one on their own as a desperate last resort should be charged with a crime and sent to jail”. You don’t need to lie and say “abortion up to birth had been legalised”. It hasn’t. Own what you believe.

English
4
2
49
1.9K
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
@mazst People are also investigated where their children die after birth. Should we make infanticide or murder legal too?
English
0
0
0
7
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
@mazst The campaigners for this amendment very clearly say that Catt, Foster etc should not have been convicted, not that the price of convicting them is too high on innocent people.
English
1
0
0
9
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
(a) you can't be guilty of any relevant offence if the baby is already dead (e.g. 1929 Act requires "a child capable of being born alive"); and, in any event (b) you won't struggle to find two doctors who would certify the following in those circumstances:
Matthew tweet media
Liam Holman@Liam_Holman99

Before, it was illegal to abort a stillborn baby after 24 weeks. A grieving mother would have to carry their dead child to term with all the risks that come with it. The bill that the Lords just passed decriminalised it.

English
2
1
15
959
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
Again, if these arguments are right, it is *never* right to try anyone other than by jury in any context. Ever.
English
0
0
1
45
Matthew
Matthew@MWHoyle19·
That includes, for example, ensuring that a person who is made terminally ill by wrongdoing, such as negligent exposure to asbestos or other carcinogens, is not held to be the cause of their own death if they accept assisted suicide.
English
0
0
1
70