ᴅʀ ᴍɪʀᴄᴇᴀ ᴢʟᴏᴛᴇᴀɴᴜ 🌺🌞🍃

3.6K posts

ᴅʀ ᴍɪʀᴄᴇᴀ ᴢʟᴏᴛᴇᴀɴᴜ 🌺🌞🍃 banner
ᴅʀ ᴍɪʀᴄᴇᴀ ᴢʟᴏᴛᴇᴀɴᴜ 🌺🌞🍃

ᴅʀ ᴍɪʀᴄᴇᴀ ᴢʟᴏᴛᴇᴀɴᴜ 🌺🌞🍃

@mzloteanu

Lecturer Psych&Crim @KingsCollegeLon | Deception Detection; Emotions; JDM | Open Science; R; Bayes | @ukrepro @ReproducibiliT StatsTea | #statstab | 🇷🇴 🇬🇧🌍

Kingston upon Thames, London Katılım Temmuz 2013
1.2K Takip Edilen935 Takipçiler
ᴅʀ ᴍɪʀᴄᴇᴀ ᴢʟᴏᴛᴇᴀɴᴜ 🌺🌞🍃 retweetledi
Daniël Lakens
Daniël Lakens@lakens·
The preprint is available on Psyarxiv: osf.io/preprints/psya… We had not heard of people trying collaborative grant writing like this before. If you have experiences with this format you would like to share, let us know!
English
0
3
7
739
ᴅʀ ᴍɪʀᴄᴇᴀ ᴢʟᴏᴛᴇᴀɴᴜ 🌺🌞🍃 retweetledi
Paul Novosad
Paul Novosad@paulnovosad·
The mass replication studies published in Nature today are insane, exemplary and an enormous pile of work to improve science. It's just so awesome how many people spent time on this in return to be 1/100 coauthors on a thing. Just outstanding 🙌🙌🙌 1/
Paul Novosad tweet media
English
13
163
860
56.4K
ᴅʀ ᴍɪʀᴄᴇᴀ ᴢʟᴏᴛᴇᴀɴᴜ 🌺🌞🍃 retweetledi
Daniël Lakens
Daniël Lakens@lakens·
FAIR data and code is both the most boring part of Open Science, and the part that will most fundamentally change how science is done. This gap is regrettable, but understandable. Most scientists can't imagine what their science would be like if research outputs were FAIR.
English
1
6
28
3.2K
Roman Folw
Roman Folw@RomanFolw·
@mzloteanu I mean, sure, most of the time VIF might not be a crucial for what you are up to (ie. you would rarely change your design or analysis based on "high" VIF values), but it still produces some information (stats.stackexchange.com/a/670842/152164).
English
1
0
1
14