imdeleted

@Ryker_Crypto Will it correct again after Bitcoin reaches 67,000?

Last time , I'm shorted $ZEC at $680 and closed at $300 with 55% profit Now , #ZEC back to $530 , I will waiting for good entry to short it again

@farag_nassar_ منير الخطير 😂😂😂 مرعب المعلمين

أنا مبقتش عارف أعمل ايه ولا مناشدة للرئيس السيسي ولا الحاج مصطفى مدبولي ولا أي حاجة قادرة توقف تهديدات إسماعيل دولار ضدي ، إسماعيل دولار دراع المعلم صبري نخنوخ بيقول عليا اني شمال في آخر بث وبلت زي النسوان وعايزني اظهر بصورتي علشان يتصرف معايا هو ومكتب المحاماة بتاعه، ربنا معايا.

@obsrvgmi @SuiNetwork $APT 0.614 😭

🚨 Another HACK What the HELL is happening on @SuiNetwork 😭 8th EXPLOIT on Sui in last 13 months: 1. Cetus (may 22, 2025) - $223M 2. Nemo (sep 7, 2025) - ~$2.4M 3. Typus (oct 2025) - $3.44M 4. Volo (apr 21, 2026) - ~$3.5M 5. Scallop (apr 26, 2026) - ~$150K 6. Aftermath perps (apr 29, 2026) - $1.4M 7. Deepbook bad debt (may 9, 2026) - $240K 8. Haedal Protocol (june 10, 2026) - $915K All these while @SuiNetwork chain also went down 4 times in the last 6 months. rought(est) year.

I've spent most of yesterday collecting the original Isle of Man filings relating to the earliest Cardano Foundation structure. Trying to be as charitable and document-driven as possible, the records appear to show that the original Isle of Man foundation involved Charles Hoskinson, Jeremy Wood, Ken Kodama, and a corporate services provider. The founder's identity remains redacted in the public filings, as well of the Enforcer. More interestingly, later filings show Charles Hoskinson serving as the Foundation's "Enforcer." Documents attached. 🧵

I'm not alleging wrongdoing. I'm asking for documentation. Who controlled the Isle of Man Foundation? What became of the ~1,090 BTC? How were the development agreements negotiated? And what governance protections existed for ADA purchasers? I'll keep following the documents wherever they lead.

The more I dig into early ICOs, the more I wonder whether Cardano and EOS may share a similar structural issue. Both raised enormous amounts of capital during the ICO era. Both relied on private, for-profit development entities. Both appear to have had relatively limited transparency into how the proceeds were ultimately deployed, at least compared to what public-market investors would expect today. The EOS story is particularly striking. EOS raised roughly 7.2 million ETH. Assuming ETH at $2,000, the original contributed assets would be worth approximately $14.4 billion today if none of the ETH had ever been spent. Yet the network itself is worth only a tiny fraction of that amount. The question isn’t necessarily where the money went. The more interesting question is why so little of the economic value associated with those contributed assets ultimately accrued to the network and token holders. That’s what has me looking more closely at Cardano. Cardano raised approximately 108,845 BTC. Assuming $75,000 Bitcoin, the original contributed assets would be worth roughly $8.2 billion today if none of the BTC had ever been spent. Cardano has unquestionably been more successful than most ICO-era projects, but I still find myself asking a simple question: what were the original obligations of the entities that received the BTC and ADA, how much was spent on development, how much was retained, invested, distributed, or otherwise monetized, and what level of transparency and accountability was promised to the people funding the ecosystem? These are questions, not accusations. One thing that stands out when looking back at ICO history is that many of the largest value gaps appear in projects where investors may not have fully appreciated the distinction between the token, the protocol, the foundation, and the private companies receiving and controlling the proceeds. A few examples using $75,000 BTC and $2,000 ETH: EOS: Raised 7.2 million ETH. Hypothetical value of original contributed assets today: $14.4 billion. Current network value: approximately $100 million. Tezos: Raised 66,000 BTC and 361,000 ETH. Hypothetical value of original contributed assets today: approximately $5.7 billion. Current network value: approximately $300 million. Cardano: Raised 108,845 BTC. Hypothetical value of original contributed assets today: approximately $8.2 billion. Current network value: approximately $6 billion. Bancor: Raised 396,000 ETH. Hypothetical value of original contributed assets today: approximately $792 million. Current network value: less than $50 million. Status: Raised 300,000 ETH. Hypothetical value of original contributed assets today: approximately $600 million. Current network value: less than $100 million. Kin: Raised approximately 320,000 ETH. Hypothetical value of original contributed assets today: approximately $640 million. Current network value: a tiny fraction of that amount. I’m still researching and learning. If you were involved with EOS, Cardano, Tezos, or other major ICO-era projects, or have historical contracts, offering documents, governance materials, or context that would help, I’d genuinely appreciate hearing from you. DMs are open.

@engcool راح تفاعل مع حسابه عشان تكون Ada ومديرها تنفيذ عبره لباقي عملات

المستثمر Thomas Braziel (مستثمر متخصص في الشركات المتعثرة والإفلاس والكريبتو) يقول انه قام بتعيين شركة تحقيقات جنائية في الكريبتوللتحقيق في مشروع كاردانوا ماليا من يوم ولادته ولحد الان: تاريخ تأسيس كاردانو والطرح العام الاصلي. أين ذهبت عملات البيتكوين التي تم جمعها في الطرح العام (حوالي 108 الف BTC)؟ التاريخ المالي للكيانات المؤسسة الثلاثة: Input Output (IOG / IOHK), Emurgo و مؤسسة كاردانو. وحتى التدقيق في الرواتب والمكافئات والارباح. بغض النظر عن الدوافع خلف هذه الخطوة, اعتقد ان كل مستثمر يستحق ان يعرف التفاصيل المالية والادارية للمشاريع الي استثمر فيها, بالاخص المشاريع الضخمة "ماليا". العملية ليست سهلة وغالبا راح تستهلك وقت طويل, والوصول الى البيانات المطلوبة للتحق منها ماراح تكون سهلة المنال.

I think I need to repost this because this gentleman took the time to build it entirely for free. It's a searchable database of virtually all the AMAs, interviews, and videos that Charles Hoskinson has produced over the years. Personally, I'm curious about what Charles has said over time regarding the founding allocations, the economics and profitability of the for-profit entities involved in Cardano's development, and the commitments that were made to the Cardano community around technology, development, and the long-term roadmap. I'd also love for the broader community to put the search engine through its paces. If you uncover anything interesting, surprising, or historically significant, please post it below. Thank you to the creator for putting this together.

Can anyone rip and transcribe 100–200 hours of YouTube videos? I'm looking for someone who can pull the transcripts from an entire YouTube channel (or a large collection of videos) and organize them in a way that can be loaded into ChatGPT or a similar AI tool for searching and analysis. Ideally, I'd like to be able to: 1.) Extract and transcribe all videos from a given YouTube channel. 2.) Load the transcripts into ChatGPT (or an equivalent system) so they are fully searchable and queryable. 3.) Search across the entire body of content for specific topics, statements, dates, people, or themes. If you've done something similar or know the best tools/person for the job, please let me know.

Fun side note from my Cardano research. Who is Guido Schmitz-Krummacher? Well, he might be one of the most interesting people in crypto that almost nobody has ever heard of. I was poking around the formation of the Cardano Foundation and noticed the same Swiss guy kept showing up. Then I looked at his website. Cardano Foundation. Tezos Foundation. Interchain Foundation (Cosmos). ShapeShift. Bancor. Golem. Lisk. ICON. Nimiq. Particl. Wings. And a whole pile of other ICO-era projects. Not as a founder, VC, or influencer. As the Swiss director, board member, or incorporation specialist helping set up many of the legal structures behind them. Think about how insane that is. Collectively, these projects represented well over $100 billion of value at various points in time and were responsible for a meaningful portion of what became Crypto Valley in Zug. So while everyone debates the founders and the tokens, there is this one guy sitting in Switzerland who appears to have had a front-row seat to an enormous percentage of crypto's institutional formation. The foundation disputes. The governance fights. The ICOs. The board meetings. The personalities. The successes. The disasters. Honestly, if someone put a microphone in front of Guido and just let him talk for three hours, it might be one of the most interesting interviews in crypto history. I may have to fly to Zug and buy this man a beer.

Research request for the Cardano community: I've been digging through the original 2016 Swiss registration of the Cardano Foundation and noticed the initial board consisted of: • Michael Kenneth Parsons (Chairman) • Bruce Robert Milligan (Vice Chairman) • John Michael Maguire • Guido Schmitz-Krummacher Does anyone know any of these individuals, or have firsthand knowledge of the Foundation's early days and governance structure? I'm particularly interested in understanding: How the original Foundation was organized? The relationship between the Foundation, IOHK, and Emurgo? How responsibilities and capital were allocated among the founding entities? Not looking to attack anyone - just trying to better understand the history and structure of one of crypto's most important projects. Any documents, introductions, or historical context would be greatly appreciated.

Charles Hoskinson's Expanding Empire: 21 Wyoming Entities, a $250M Healthcare Bet, and a Newly Formed Family Office: I've been digging through Wyoming filings and, based on a preliminary review, I count at least 21 Hoskinson-named entities. Annual formation count: • 2019: 1 • 2020: 0 • 2021: 3 • 2022: 2 • 2023: 6 • 2024: 6 • 2025: 4 Entities identified so far: 2019 • Hoskinson Construction LLC (later dissolved) 2021 • Hoskinson Biotechnology, Inc. • Hoskinson Ranch, LLC • The Hoskinsons LLC (later dissolved) 2022 • Hoskinson Biotechnology Holding, LLC • Hoskinson Health & Wellness Clinic, LLC 2023 • Hoskinson Ancillary Services, LLC • Hoskinson Contracting, LLC • Hoskinson Electrical, LLC (dissolved) • Hoskinson Heating & Cooling, LLC (dissolved) • Hoskinson Plumbing, LLC (dissolved) • Hoskinson Telecom, LLC (dissolved) 2024 • Hoskinson Audiology, LLC • Hoskinson Concrete, LLC • Hoskinson Family Office, LLC • Hoskinson Foundation, Inc. • Hoskinson Laboratory, LLC 2025 • Hoskinson Family Office Holdings 1, LLC • Hoskinson Medical Equipment House • Hoskinson Radiology, LLC • Hoskinson Vision, P.C. To be clear, there is nothing inherently improper about having many entities. Plenty of successful entrepreneurs use separate vehicles for liability protection, operating businesses, real estate, investments, and estate planning. What I find interesting is the acceleration. Formation activity appears to increase materially beginning in 2023 and continues through 2025, particularly around healthcare, biotech, and family-office structures. The healthcare ecosystem alone appears substantial: clinic, laboratory, radiology, audiology, vision, medical equipment, ancillary services, biotech entities, and supporting construction companies. Public reporting has referenced roughly $250 million invested into the broader healthcare initiative. I'm not alleging wrongdoing. I'm simply trying to understand the scale of what has been built, how the various entities relate to one another, and how much capital has ultimately been deployed across the ecosystem.

One thing I’ve learned over the last week: ask a few uncomfortable questions about Polymarket or Cardano and you’ll quickly discover who is interested in debate and who is interested in protecting a narrative. What struck me most wasn’t the disagreement, it was how many of the loudest attacks appeared to come from accounts with referral links, platform branding, affiliate relationships, or other apparent financial ties. Whether these are prediction markets, crypto assets, or something else entirely, participants deserve transparency regarding who is speaking independently and who has an economic incentive to promote the platform. Questions are healthy. Undisclosed financial interests masquerading as organic community sentiment are not.

I've been trying to better understand the broader Hoskinson ecosystem, and I have to admit, there appears to be quite an extensive portfolio of ancillary ventures beyond Cardano itself. Based solely on LinkedIn headcount (which may be inaccurate), the numbers are striking: • Hoskinson Health & Wellness Clinic (~97 employees). A healthcare operation of that size could plausibly require $15–30M+ annually to operate when accounting for physicians, clinical staff, benefits, facilities, equipment, insurance, and administration. • Hoskinson Contracting (~26 employees). A diversified contracting business spanning HVAC, electrical, excavation, and construction could easily support several million dollars of annual operating expenditures while requiring meaningful capital investment in equipment and personnel. • Hoskinson Family Office (~14 employees). This is perhaps the most intriguing. A family office with a staff of that scale is not a casual undertaking. Depending on compensation levels and services provided, one could reasonably estimate annual operating costs in the low-to-mid seven figures. Family offices with double-digit employee counts are generally associated with substantial pools of capital and a fairly sophisticated investment operation. To be clear, there is absolutely nothing improper about entrepreneurs deploying capital into other ventures. In fact, many successful founders do exactly that. What I find interesting is that when one aggregates the headcount across these organizations, the operational footprint becomes quite substantial. If the employee counts are broadly accurate, we're discussing an ecosystem supporting well over 100 employees across healthcare, construction, investment management, and other initiatives. This is why I remain genuinely curious about the historical allocation of capital throughout the Cardano ecosystem. Understanding where capital was deployed, how various affiliated entities were financed, and what returns those investments generated would provide a fascinating case study in one of the largest crypto projects ever created. Perhaps the answer is that these investments were extraordinarily successful. If so, that would be a compelling and bullish story in its own right. I'm simply interested in seeing the numbers.

Cardano investors deserve answers. I've hired a crypto forensics firm to investigate the history of Cardano's founding, its original ICO proceeds, the movement of the BTC raised, and the financial history of the founding entities. I'm looking for information on: • The original ICO BTC addresses and where those funds ultimately went • The formation and ownership history of the founding entities, including Input Output (IOG/IOHK), Emurgo, and the Cardano Foundation • Salary, bonus, dividend, and other compensation paid by these entities over time • Any public or private disclosures regarding treasury management, BTC sales, ADA sales, or distributions to owners and insiders • Historical corporate records, annual reports, audits, board minutes, presentations, or other relevant documents I'm not alleging wrongdoing. In fact, the answer may be entirely reasonable. But Cardano raised what would be worth billions of dollars today, and I think the community deserves a complete accounting of what happened to those assets and how the ecosystem was funded over time. If you have documents, research, leads, archived websites, old forum posts, wallet information, or firsthand knowledge, please reach out. I'd like to build the most complete historical record possible.

@EgyHashX بيانيس 🤢

البتكوين حاليا وصل لدرجة من السلبية لم يصلها من وقت انهيار Luna في 2022 ويمكن أسوأ! كل ده وسايلور دافع فوق الـ 60 مليار دولار وغير تدفقات صناديق المؤشرات وباقي الصناديق الاستثمارية، وسوق الأسهم بيحقق قمم جديدة كل شهر! يا ترى يا هل ترى.. مين معاه كميات بتكوين ضخمة لدرجة إن كل السيولة دي لم تقدر على امتصاص مبيعاته 🤔

@Dogi1313 Yes it is 10 dollars 💸

@abderrahmanesaf @BybitArabic @Bybit_Official @Crypt0men

تم حضر حسابي على @BybitArabic لمدة ثلاث اشهر لا استطيع فيها سحب اموالي بدون سبب فعلي فقط طلب على p2p تمت سرقتي انا فيه زائد تم حضر حسابي مع العلم انا تاجر موثوق و لدي اموال مهمة في الحساب ارجوا مكنك توخي الحذر من هاذه المنصة @Bybit_Official @BybitArabic

@Dogi1313 @Dogi1313 😭😭

@obsrvgmi Go to avax Link Don't go ZEC

The hardest part of this cycle isn't making money 😭 It's admitting your favorite altcoin is dead. Seriously considering selling everything and buying: • $HYPE • $ZEC • Privacy coins • AI coins The altcoin supercycle was the biggest psyop ever.