Mankind vs Modern Feminism

Here's the full, evolved SWIFT array of intersexual strategies used by women (and men helping women) to increase the flow of both soft (social) and hard (tangible) resources from men to women. This process, having been corrupted, is destroying our civilization. Change Log: Updated December 26th, 2025 * Renamed PPP ▶️ PERPP as a mnemonic. * Added secondary Behavioral Sink references. Underlying the entire SWIFT array, consistent with the work of Dr. Dani Sulikowski, @DrDaniS, and the observations (and philosophy) of the "Reactionary Feminists" (Kim Harrington @moveincircles, Louise Perry, @Louise_m_perry, et al) is Female Reproductive Suppression. Their work is merged, here, by the work in intersexual conflict by @TaniaArline, the author of "Gender Bias in Moral Typecasting", a significant contribution to my own (imperfect) research as a polymath in the evolutionary biology of intersexual relationship inside the "chemistry" of our unprecedented social evolution. The work of @herandrews in "The Great Feminization" will also resonate strongly. I would argue @GadSaad 's "Suicidal Empathy" has its roots in this pattern as well. Tagging here does NOT imply their endorsement, but a "Hail Mary" opportunity to comment / disagree / refine / integrate (as I have). I am no-one, and will purposefully remain no-one. My work is presented in intentionally inflammatory terms to promote good faith (heated) discussion and debate. I am not a published researcher or author. I'm a hardworking and highly-informed polymath with high cognitive ability provoking debate and solutions. For reasons that should become obvious for anyone who understands @TaniaArline's work, the solutions - absent insurgency or war, once women achieve superior social influence - must come from women themselves. Most interventions from men will accelerate civilization death. The SYNERGY is my construction. Very little of the base work is my own, only the SYNTHESIS into a comprehensive pattern that demonstrates correlation and causality between core processes. All of the credit for the "bones" must be given to others. Only the "flesh" is my work. What's the core of Female Reproductive Suppression (FRS)? In an evolved context, women did not have children because they wanted children, they had children as a byproduct of securing safety and resources. Evolution programmed women to exchange sexual access for immediate emotional, social, and physical resources - which RESULTED in children, but children were not the INTENT. This was the pattern before human beings developed ANY form of cognitive ability 300,000 years ago or had any ability to understand that sex resulted, ten months later, in a baby. This is our hardwired coding, female sexual access for male "fitness currency". Indeed, evolution programmed women NOT to have children while securing resources (the entire point of concealed ovulation, another precognitive evolutionary construct). This worked because women didn't have a CHOICE. Children were INEVITABLE given our evolution. So evolution did not evolve any clear limits on women's female reproductive suppression -"logical" limits such as being compelled to have children at "replacement levels". These limits were NATURALLY exceeded by our evolved system where women didn't control resources, protection, or the correlated social status. Evolved limits on FRS weren't necessary, and were never "installed" or "coded" by evolution. This is, fundamentally, why women and men generally have disparate long term sexual wants and needs, and the foundation of evolved "sexual overperception bias" in men, and "sexual underperception bias" in women. Women DO NOT IMPLICITY WANT CHILDREN. They want social status, protection, resources, and experiences, and primarily exchange SEX (with resulting children) to OBTAIN those outcomes in a historic context of scarcity (not surplus). We BELIEVED that women wanted children more than men because (when women lacked the ability to manufacture social status and safety), women pushed for these outcomes. It was the only data we had at the time. But our social evolution has changed with technology - and with those changes, we have new and clear behavioral data that demonstrate the underlying evolved motivations. Now that women can create and maintain their own social status and resources - and now that the world is a generally safe place to exist and is "in surplus" - the female evolutionary proclivity towards FRS can find its full, evolved expression in women's conduct. Most women do not want children - or if they DO want children, they want FAR fewer children than men. Women want resources, experiences, and social status. Women, themselves - particularly but not limited to young women - are not interested in family or children. nbcnews.com/politics/polit… Along with this proclivity towards SURPLUS-based FRS (SUFRS) comes an aversion (or hatred) of men, masculinity, marriage, family, and children because these things are NO LONGER REQUIRED to achieve social status, safety, resources, and experiences - the core female evolutionary drivers of behavior - and are now characterized as "oppression" - at least until the social status, safety, resource flow, and experiences erode in times of war or scarcity, at which point men will be called upon to solve problems (their ancient evolutionary utility). This evolved proclivity is seen in the "Where Are All The Good Men" articles from women who have begun to experience various forms of scarcity (including a general decline in dopamine from the decline of peak fecundity). Yet, absent children, the ancient evolved systems remains in place, compelling the transfer of "fitness currency" from men, to women, to children, to the womb - now hijacked, through birth control (abortion, etc) by women instead being controlled by the womb itself. This mirrors @Louise_m_perry's criticisms of the excesses of the Sexual Revolution This is the resulting system, and the contaminated pattern that has resulted in the corruption that is "Modern Intersectional Feminism" the highest concentration of the "cancer". The core of it all is an evolved compulsion, on a distribution curve of proclivity, in many (but not nearly all) women towards SUrplus-based anti-natalist Female Reproductive Suppression (SUFRS) 👇. What follows is the SWIFT, FEED, SUFRS, and PERPP systems - generally productive when children are inevitable and female social influence is less than or approaches male social power- and the TORN, SIMPER, and COLD systems - the downfall of civilization towards the Behavioral Sink of civilizational death when female social influence exceeds male influence. These patterns are intended to be evocative and controversial, but they are generally correct ethological arguments, and based soundly in evolution, often with multiple allospecific parallels. The SWIFT Array of Civilizational Death The SWIFT pattern - SWIFT, FEED, SUFRS, PERPP, TORN, SIMPER, COLD, and The Behavioral Sink that follows is a corrupted natural system ENTIRELY predictable given our physical and social evolution. We've become "cancerous", in opposition to (capital E) Evolution's interests (Diaspora and Saturation through Reproduction and Adaptation), and we (Western Democracy) are in the process of being surgically, genetically excised from humanity by our own hand (beliefs, attitudes, policies, behaviors, and processes) because we are, ultimately, Evolution's "hands". Evolution is using us to destroy ourselves through @GadSaad's "Suicidal Ideation" (a Behavioral Sink). SWIFT: Synergistic Womb Infant Female Triage x.com/MankindVsModFe… SWIFT entirely predicts both Modern Feminism and The Men and Boy Crisis as corrupted evolved compulsions given our social evolution. It's solid evolutionary theory grounded in ethology, biology, and human chemistry. The womb is an entirely separate evolutionary entity from the woman. The woman hosts the womb and receives benefits from that hosting - but the womb is a separate conceptual entity. The womb dominates the hierarchy, followed by infants, then women - and adult men aren't on the hierarchy at all. This is the core evolved "engine". SWIFT leads naturally to FEED. FEED: Female Evolved Emotional Dysregulation x.com/MankindVsModFe… FEED is the public "fuel" for SWIFT. Human beings evolved to respond to emotional distress WITHIN SWIFT. Conceptual distress to the womb comes first, then babies, then children, then women, then men, on a distribution curve of de-facto infantilization and parentification. Women EVOLVED to be less emotionally regulated than men, and to overtly or covertly USE emotional dysregulation to amplify existing SWIFT flows of fitness currency. FEED leads naturally to SUFRS, PERPP, TORN, SIMPER, and COLD in our current social evolution. SUFRS: Surplus-based Female Reproductive Suppression x.com/MankindVsModFe… SUFRS is the corrupted evolved, ethologically sound response to women having full control over their own caloric surplus, social status, reproductive capacity, and state-provided protection. Absent existential interdependence with men, women follow a compulsion towards suppressing their own reproductive capacity, and the reproductive capacity of their female peers, including animus towards men (false or specious narratives), masculinity, marriage, conception, children, and family. The higher their personal and collective control of these forms of "fitness currency", the higher the level of dysfunction that follows with PERPP, TORN, SIMPER, COLD, and the inevitable outcome of the Behavioral Sink (civilizational death). Female in-group bias locks in the pattern, and the malice towards men, even as women (under parallel evolved compulsions) enter individual relationships with men. PERPP: PERformative Provocative Parasitism x.com/MankindVsModFe… PERPP is the individual "supercharger" variant of FEED when ENTERING or MAINTAINING a relationship with one partner. Women evolved to provoke men, inside relationships, emotionally and physically, towards non-reproductively injurious violence, for two reasons - to amplify their own caloric surplus and social status, and to test for surplus resources and emotional regulation for potential children. Women are more casually violent than men in relationships IN PROPORTION TO THEIR FECUNDITY. This is the reason why. They evolved this way. Not only in humans but in other animals. Fecundity is causal to much female violence towards men. PERPP leads to TORN in our high-optionality, high-Opportunity social zeitgeist. TORN: Terminal Optionality-Induced Relational Neuroticism. x.com/MankindVsModFe… TORN is what happens when women (and men) enter high-optionality workplaces together (against evolved history), and have high opportunity for discreet opportunities, through technology, for flirting and hookups. Women's heightened neuroticism translates these opportunities as something implicitly "wrong" with their core relationship - a generalized dysphoria - and women subsequently increase PERPP (provocation, contempt) inside their core relationship to secure the fitness currency they BELIEVE they could receive in a new relationship. It's all an illusion that results in a pattern of relational fragmentation mirroring attachment disorders and BPD that destroys families, but it's inevitable given the ethology involved. If you see it in your relationship - rising female provocation inside a marriage when your wife has high optionality and opportunity - your marriage is likely already over. TORN almost inevitably leads to SIMPER. SIMPER: Sexualization, Infantilization, Manipulation, Provocation, Escalation, and Repetition x.com/MankindVsModFe… SIMPER is the individual "supercharger" variant of FEED when EXITING or DESTROYING a relationship. Individually, the best examples are the "Silver Bullet" of false allegations in family law, and women's frequent histrionic reactions to public accountability to law enforcement. Women's primary forms of aggression are RELATIONAL, and not physical. This is a form of evolved female violence, given the high importance of social status as "safety" to women, to shift all responsibility to men for any form of relational failure to ensure their subsequent protection and social inclusivity (survival with women). This evolved proclivity is the source of all "women and accountability" memes. This pattern, once started, will finish with relational death, it's only a matter of time. If you see it in your relationship, get out quickly, as the process will escalate until the blame for failure is entirely shifted to the husband to secure the woman's social safety (and future reproductive capacity). Almost everyone around you will choose sides based on sex alone, and they WILL, given the ethology involved, choose her, absent egregious conduct, even if she's the PERPPetrator. SIMPER inevitably leads to COLD. COLD: Constrained Oxytocin, Low Dopamine x.com/MankindVsModFe… The process of familial fragmentation leads to low birth rates. Low birth rates lead to a substantial reduction in opportunities for post-menopausal women to engage in alloparenting (cuddling grandchildren), which is the primary source of mental health chemicals for post-menopausal women after fecundity-based male attention fades. This is what evolution INTENDED to occur, but if women don't have enough children earlier in life when they're fecund, they have no opportunity to make the transition to alloparenting later in life. The result is massive rise in female dysphoria (how evolution generally communicates with us), diagnosed as anxiety and depression, and a huge reduction in post-fecundity quality of life. Behavioral Sink: A feedback loop - a "doom loop" - that destroys civilization The net impact of SWIFT, FEED, SUFRS, PERPP, TORN, SIMPER, and COLD - the SWIFT Array - is the death of our civilization through a "Behavioral Sink" (the ethological work of John B Calhoun). The corruption of our normal evolutionary processes is interpreted, through evolved individual and group (zeitgeist, "hive" level) feedback loops, as an infectious cancer, and evolution takes action to destroy that cancer by destroying our civilization, through indifference or insurgency. Core Behavioral Sink: x.com/MankindVsModFe… SWIFT as a Causal Agent of the Behavioral Sink: x.com/MankindVsModFe… Barring disruption of this pattern, by volition or by force, that removes this cancer or makes it a chronic managed condition, Western Democracy will die. And we are dying. This is how. The answer is to understand the pattern, resolve our intersexual war, stabilize marriage and family, have children at or slightly above replacement levels, reduce immigration, stay off social media, move to more rural environments, stabilize communities, and adopt a generally pronatalist perspective where having children at replacement levels is socially and economically (through tax policy) incentivized. Ignorance was Bliss I miss the way I viewed the world before I knew too much about it (see the Peanuts pic). Ignorance is bliss. Knowing we are dying - knowing that my children are living as cells inside a dying body, knowing the reasons why, and not being able to influence outcomes - is the greatest burden I've ever carried, and taking direct action, as man, will only accelerate that death (for reasons you'll understand if you review the analysis). Education, cognitive processing instead of evolutionarily-compelled emotional reasoning, and voluntary change are the cure - or least the tools necessary to make this a chronic instead of lethal condition. This is my "Hail Mary" at the end of a losing game, knowing that only a touchdown will save us. Only resolving our rising intersexual war will save us. That conflict is the root (and cause) of most other conflicts. The ball's in the air. Catch it, or not, this is the best I can do to help. Women have to catch this ball and run with it. If men intervene too strongly we will, certainly, accelerate the very fall we predict. Prove me wrong. Please.

Ladies, you wouldn't treat a dog this way. You'd get bitten. Why do it to a man? Once? Maybe. Twice? Fuck you. Eat a fist.

Bachelorette "star" caught on camera throwing bar stools at her baby daddy while their daughter gets caught in the crossfire. And this is who they want to put on TV? Absolutely trash human behavior. Imagine doing that in front of your own kid.

@FatherX2022 Separation 2018. Orders 2024. Alienation ongoing, court ignored it. It succeeded post-orders in September of 2025.

@MankindVsModFem I am so sorry... Words cannot express... When did this happen?

My youngest son has been entirely alienated from me, for six months, by his mentally ill mother, since last September, in spite of clear 50/50 court orders. I was, and am, an excellent father. She killed the son I loved. I miss him so badly at times I can barely breathe. Every player in this dumpster fired has lied on her behalf. Every player in this dumpster fire has manufactured evidence, or manufactured cause, to help her do it. CPS claimed I had criminal charges for firearms and domestic violence when their own records showed they contacted both regional and federal law enforcement and were advised law enforcement had no concerns and no charges. CPS claimed I was mentally ill by misrepresenting the report of a Clinical Psychologist who subsequently wrote a letter condemning their misrepresentation, confirming I was healthy, and all but calling them liars. CPS lied on the stand, perjuring themselves to assist a mother who was clearly attempting to use them to alienate a child. Because that's what CPS does. I sued them and won a settlement, but it was too late to save my son. The judge herself manufactured evidence in her decision that was not presented during trial, allowed new testimony after closing arguments from the mother without permitting cross-examination or rebuttal, ignored evidence presented by a teacher that I was clearly acting in my son's best interests academically during COVID and had good relationships with my son's teachers, and entirely disqualified three of my witnesses as "prejudiced", dismissing their testimony entirely, in spite of each of them presenting exculpatory factual testimony that destroyed my ex-wife's claims. If she weren't protected by absolute judicial immunity - if she were an employer and not a judge - I would destroy her in civil court. The malice of the system towards men is omnipresent. No one in power cares. This is what they system is designed to do. It's designed to destroy men, and children, and to serve the mother over all others, while protecting itself from any change that could negatively impact the power and control of women and mothers over men and children. I will never rest until the system is destroyed. Not modified. Not reformed. I will not rest until the system - and it's malicious advocates in Modern Feminism - are destroyed utterly. Root and stem. Burned to ashes. There is no reforming Family Law. There is no negotiation, or transformation. It destroys children. It destroys men. It encourages, promotes, and manufactures lies. It destroys families. It must be burned to the ground and destroyed. Utterly.

@Plinkyplonkery @designmom Triggered? Nah. That's my everyday reaction to fucking idiots.

@MankindVsModFem @designmom

Girls and women don’t “get pregnant.” They are impregnated. By men. Quick reminder: Ovulation is involuntary. Ejaculation is voluntary.

Honored to rant about the unhinged antinatalist propaganda from The Cut for the @PirateWires Daily 👇

@Wuhufu67520 @MeffSteff Men who love their sons are drama queens? I understand your son died from gun violence? Or is that just you being dramatic, fuckwit?

@MeffSteff @MankindVsModFem She didn't. He's just a drama queen.

@AaronMConner Yes, it's a function of self infantilization

@MankindVsModFem I have seen it in toddlers before.

What you're seeing here is an ethological compulsion by some women - this one being an excellent example - to use emotions to avoid accountability. It's called FEED - Female Evolved Emotional Dysregulation. Once you see it, you can NEVER unsee it... x.com/MankindVsModFe…

@original_lexi Laugh while you can. There will come a day when you feel regret. Perhaps we'll all be there to see it. I can hope so. See you in the streets.

Men are so fucking dramatic LMAOOO

Men want SEX, obtainable ONLY through women. Women want LIFESTYLE. If she can secure the LIFESTYLE she wants without you, and she doesn't NEED you in her life, she will struggle to fully commit to the marriage. Walk away unless she needs you.

What the hell is it about women who think they can lay hands on a man without getting laid out? They wouldn't treat a DOG this way out of CERTAINTY they'd get bitten. Why do they treat men worse than dogs?

@bigdigglers I agree. When women abuse men, their primary tool isn't a knife, or a gun. Their primary tool is their power over relationships - and their power over children makes our children very effective weapons against us.

@MankindVsModFem Sorry to hear of this. While not aimed directly at you, this outcome only exists because we (read: men) are willing to tolerate bad behavior on the part of women. When guys can make peace with forgoing women (surrogacy, intimacy, etc), things might start to improve.

@RaineyOvalle Yes. You are.

I will never be offended by anything Sabrina Carpenter does because I am not the kind of man these songs are about.

@NotAllWomenX Only with other women - and their ingroup bias is savage.

@MankindVsModFem Walk away toward what? Like you said, women have power through inclusivity—if they walk away, they are no longer included, are they?

Men have unilateral power. Women, generally, only have power through inclusivity and reciprocity. As men withdraw from relationships, women lose power. We are, ultimately, their real power. So now they try and compel us with shame, policy, and law. Don't listen. Walk away.

@NotAllWomenX When you do that... most of them will walk away.

@MankindVsModFem Don't walk away—set your boundaries and stand your ground.

In 2018, an Arizona woman was arrested after texting a man 159,000 times over 10 months following just one date. That’s about 530 texts a day.

Man have problem Man get tool Man fix problem Woman have problem Woman tell man to fix problem Man get tool Woman tell man tool is scary Woman ban tool Woman wonder why man hasn’t fixed problem

Disgraced ex-teacher McKenna Kindred Venmoed her teen student gas money to keep their tryst rolling trib.al/lkpNDnf