穿越
63 posts


@IRMilitaryMedia Because USA destroyed all your country's facilities within a month, you currently have no targets they want to bomb. Hurry up and dig out the survivors buried underground. They don't want to harm your people right now.
English

@IRMilitaryMedia Where is your country's air force? Where is your navy? Where is your leader?
English

@IranArmystan_ Are you using photos of sunken ships to retaliate against the US? I think your most powerful weapon after losing your navy is your big mouth.
English

👀 A shocking incident has reportedly occurred with Trump: he came out to speak and suddenly his legs gave way. The president is said to have suffered a nervous breakdown due to the situation with Iran. His health has reportedly deteriorated sharply.
According to insider sources, everyone in Trump’s inner circle is aware of this, including Vice President J.D. Vance and the military. Some members of Congress have allegedly called on them to “remove” the U.S. leader.
What do you think about this?

English

@BoKuangyi @Lingling_Wei 对于你的个人家庭遭遇我很同情你,但是我觉得你啥也弄不明白,你父母把你送出国,就是想给你换换脑子。可惜是白忙!
中文

Several friends have sent me this article by @Lingling_Wei so I’ll give my two cents.
I agree, American socialism isn’t Chinese socialism. But I’d go further.
I’ve always found it inadequate to describe China using what amounts to 20th century western political vocabulary. They don’t fit, because we’ve had our own wholly distinct political evolution over millennia.
Our “total, centralised, one-party control” isn’t “socialism” manifested, but the product of our own trajectory.
The massive centralised bureaucracy traces back to the Han dynasty. It’s not a socialist invention. We discovered long ago that it is necessary, for when we were decentralised, we tend to end up in the throes of chaos.
The idea that communal/state interest supersedes the individual’s has long been the accepted norm, consistent with Confucian philosophy - 大义over小义. (I don’t agree with this, merely noting the provenance.)
If one must assign China an “ism”, it ought to be PRAGMATISM.
It’s obviously not communism - we ran that experiment, endured the carnage, and emerged with a rather informed opinion on the subject.
And though we’ve kept the name, I’ve been taught that the singular motivation of the first CCP revolutionaries was to create prosperity, not to implement communism per se.
Anyway, China has been debating matters of statecraft, legitimacy, and the accountability of powers since the warring states period. There’s much to be said about how our political history has evolved - and it remains an ongoing process.
But when I hear people judging China based solely on western frameworks, I have to respectively push back. It’s like critiquing Peking Opera as if it were a Broadway musical.
Lingling Wei 魏玲灵@Lingling_Wei
What people have in the U.S. is a messy, loud, and often vicious debate about how to allocate resources. What people have in China is the absence of one. wsjchina.cmail19.com/t/d-e-gjipjl-d…
English

@gtconway3d What would your life be if you couldn’t talk about President Trump?
English




























