Maria Carmi

THESE ARE MY OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS THAT I ACTUALLY USE.🙃 FACEBOOK: @mariacarmi INSTAGRAM: @mariacarmireal TIKTOK: @mariacarmiofficial

THANKS SO MUCH. IT'S A PLEASURE TO HAVE YOU ON BOARD. WELCOME!!

AUTHORITIES, PLEASE TRACE WHERE ALL THAT MONEY WAS COMING FROM. IT SURE AS HECK WASN'T COMING OUT OF MY BANK ACCOUNT.

WHAT? ARE THEY TRYING TO EXPLAIN DEPOSITS IN THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS??? DING DING DING🎯

JSYK, I NEVER GAVE ANY OF THOSE PEOPLE A RED CENT. I PAID A MONTH'S PLUS RENT TO MY FORMER LANDLORD. THAT'S IT--AND I GAVE CHRISTMAS PRESENTS IN 2024. THAT WAS MY LAST GIFT TO FAMILY. NO OTHER GIFTS/MONEY HAVE CHANGED HANDS.

AND THAT CHRISTMAS GIFT WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR $40 COMBINED--A CHECK OR GIFT CARD.

Ready to bring ideas to life? Try Grok Imagine today

@Beyond_theleash HAPPY BIRTHDAY, BRUNO!!! 🤎🤎🤎💝💝💝

THANKS A BUNCH. GREAT TO HAVE YOU ON BOARD. WELCOME!!

@DogLovers03 HAPPY BIRTHDAY, FELLA!!! 🎉🎉🎉

HERE'S ONE LINK I USED TODAY TO GET INFO ABOUT THE TRIAL. localnewsmatters.org/2026/05/02/mus…

NO, SIR, ELON IS GENUINELY CONCERNED FOR THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY. HE DOESN'T TRUST ALTMAN TO HAVE ALTRUISTIC MOTIVES. HE WANTS HIM REMOVED. I DON'T KNOW SAM ALTMAN, BUT JUST LOOKING AT WHAT ELON HAS CONTRIBUTED VERSUS WHAT SAM ALTMAN HAS CONTRIBUTED FOR HUMANITY? I PICK ELON.

THIS IS NOT SOME TYPE OF FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT, FOLKS. IF IT WERE, THE JUDGE WOULD HAVE THROWN IT OUT. NICE TRY, MR. SAVITT, BUT THIS CASE IS NOT ALL ABOUT MUSK. IT'S ALL ABOUT ALTMAN. HE'S THE DEFENDANT. I HAPPEN TO KNOW A LITTLE SOMETHIN' SOMETHIN' ABOUT PEOPLE MAKING THINGS UP OUT OF THIN AIR. I MUST SAY YOUR CASE DOESN'T LOOK TOO HOT IN THAT REGARD. DON'T TRY TO PUT THAT ON ELON. PEOPLE CAN SMELL WHEN THEY'RE BEING KABOODLED.

AND OF COURSE ELON WANTED CONTROL. 1) FINANCIALLY HE HAD A CONTROLLING INTEREST AND DESERVED IT. 2) WHEN HE SAW HOW ALTMAN WAS STARTING TO TURN OPEN AI INTO A FOR-PROFIT, INSTEAD OF KEEPING THEIR DEAL, HE REALIZED ALTMAN WAS NOT THE RIGHT PERSON TO BE TRUSTED WITH IT. MAYBE IT NEEDS A BOARD INSTEAD OF JUST ONE PERSON. MAYBE YOU NEED SCIENTISTS, HUMANITARIANS, AND EVEN SOME COMMON FOLKS ON THAT BOARD.

IS ELON CORRECT ABOUT HIS BUSINESS PARTNERS AGREEING TO MAKE IT NON-PROFIT?? LOOK AT THE NAME, FOLKS. LOOK AT THE NAME. IF THESE GUYS DIDN'T ORIGINALLY AGREE TO MAKE THIS A NON-PROFIT IN PERPETUITY, THEN WHY WOULD THEY CALL IT "OPEN AI"? SO THESE BOYS SEE THE MONEY START TO COME IN, AND THEY GET GREEDY. SO THEY PROBABLY HIRE A FANCY ATTORNEY TO TRY TO GAME THE SYSTEM AND MAKE AN END RUN AROUND WHAT THEY ORIGINALLY AGREED TO. IF ANYONE HAD REMORSE, IT WAS THEM--NOT ELON. THEY'VE SURELY GOT THAT ONE BACKWARD.

I HEAR LAW PROFESSORS AND ATTORNEYS TRYING TO FRAME ELON'S TRIAL AS A CASE OF SELLER'S REMORSE DUE TO THE FINANCIAL BLOW-UP OF OPEN AI--ONLY ELON WON'T GET THE MONEY. THAT'S NOT WHAT HE'S AFTER. HE WANTS THE MONEY RETURNED WHERE IT BELONGS--TO THE NONPROFIT PART OF OPEN AI INSTEAD OF THE SUBSIDIARY FOR-PROFIT PART.

I SHOULD HAVE PUT THE LINK WHERE I GOT THE INFO WHEN I WAS PUTTING OUT FACTS ABOUT ELON'S TRIAL A FEW DAYS AGO. I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. IF I FIND IT, I'LL POST IT.

Grok 4.20 is here: Get ready for a revolution in AI.

10B