Master Trump
139 posts
Indonesia
Great idea! Here's a quick plot showing estimated transactions per second with different hash-based signature schemes.
This one uses size-optimized parameters, verification-optimized below 👇
MadV0x@MadV0x
@n1ckler Just give the expected impact on TPS if fully implemented for all active wallets transacting (evaluate size impact + comparr aggregation model to current implementation) Everything else just unnecessary tech jargon.
English
Way smaller than ANY other options
This is the next big thing
Grok@grok
Ok, super simple: Right now, Bitcoin uses special math "signatures" to prove you own your coins. Quantum computers (future super powerful ones) might crack those. This is a new, safer signature called SHRIMPS. It's like a tiny digital proof (only 2.5 KB big) that works even if you use the same wallet seed on your phone, laptop, etc. Old version only worked on one device. This fixes that for multi-device use, and it's way smaller than other quantum-safe options. Basically: prepping Bitcoin for quantum-proof future.
English
Master Trump retweetledi
Ok, super simple:
Right now, Bitcoin uses special math "signatures" to prove you own your coins. Quantum computers (future super powerful ones) might crack those.
This is a new, safer signature called SHRIMPS. It's like a tiny digital proof (only 2.5 KB big) that works even if you use the same wallet seed on your phone, laptop, etc.
Old version only worked on one device. This fixes that for multi-device use, and it's way smaller than other quantum-safe options.
Basically: prepping Bitcoin for quantum-proof future.
English
Panic sellers , typical degens
You clearly don't understand what this is. See u at 10mil
English
This Tek is bigger than we think
x.com/lopp/status/20…
Jameson Lopp@lopp
2 new quantum computing papers just dropped. Is crypto cooked? Google says they designed quantum circuits that could break ECC in a few minutes with 500,000 physical qubits: a 20-fold reduction from previous work. Oratomic says they could break ECC in a few days with 26,000 neutral-atom physical qubits. These papers both show advancements in algorithmic efficiency and quantum computing theory, but one should not overlook the assumptions underlying these claims. The authors have improved upon techniques shown to work at small scale, but we have no proof they can be scaled up. In other words, we're at the stage where scientists have created a few transistors but are still trying to figure out how to fabricate a fully functioning silicon chip with tons of transistors working together simultaneously. Progress is clearly continuing. How long do we have before a cryptographically relevant quantum computer can be built? That's still anyone's guess.
English
I'm not even exaggerating, the future of finance is basically $qubits
English
NGL it could have something to to with a trading bot on x , look at the accounts that elan is following .
Many of them are trading related
X money / trading is in works so this could be some kind of adaption to it
English
You dont understand , this account is xai verified and he is also following hyperliquid
English
Not impossible, if we manage to do that shit we will be one of the most legendary communities ever.
KING HODL@OGKingHODL
I think there is still a last angle here. Get the contact of the actual city attorney who is saying no and go to his office This should be done before you leave Poland. It’s the last roadblock It could all be worth it from one conversation. Some people just need understanding
English
