Robin Mathy

Binaries are like black and white movies. All of nothing thinking is a cognitive distortion. Categories are man-made social structures designed to support the elite through exclusion. Just because there are categories does not mean humans need binaries. Some categories, like sex, are made up. You dont go around asking people about their chromosomes or genes or hormones. That means those criteria are exclusionary contrivances. For someone who is so narcissistic they use Dr in social media handles. I experience you as quite daft about human sexuality.

I'm 'banned' from Buck House because I'm not Royal. I'm 'banned' from carrying out heart transplants because I'm not a transplant surgeon. I'm 'banned' from being on the Team GB rhythmic gymnastics team because I'm 60+ and I need to lose two stone! Society only works properly because we have categories. Categories that are based on objective, observable and measurable differences such as sex, education, physical ability, etc. 'Inclusivity' is a fantasy. It is a fairy-tale. It is our attempt to make "all shall have cake" into reality. But it cannot work. For the good of everyone, we have to exclude certain people from doing certain things for which they are ineligible, and/or unqualified. We cannot destroy society on the psychotic/psychopathic ideations of somebody who feels themselves to be 'born in the wrong body' Transvestite Neotoddlers need to be told a firm "no". They need to be put on the naughty step until they stop their tantruming and start to make good choices.

An Open Letter to Kaley Lynn Chile (re Responsibility to Practice within... youtu.be/qhH_A-ojiqI?si… via @YouTube

An Open Letter to Kaley Lynn Chile, LPC, LAD about Practicing within Sco... youtu.be/El1AkN804AU?si… via @YouTube

C!s lesbian woman called “sir” by restaurant staff and blocked from using toilet. This is gender critical in action. This is what ⁦@bphillipsonMP⁩ is bringing to Britain. This is what ✌️’women’s rights’ ✌️ campaigner JK Rowling is cheering. outsports.com/2025/5/21/2411…

@MrKennethPowers @naretevduorp LOL. You make an erroneous assumption I haven't watched him. In h8s own words: wouldn't trust a Black pilot. Or treat them as we did in 50s and 60s. I could go on. The question is why you hold someone filled with such hatred with such positive regard?

@MathyRobin @naretevduorp Amazing how wrong this is if you just actually watched his videos and not swallowed every 2 second clip from your liberal friends.

@MrKennethPowers @naretevduorp Define gunk

@MathyRobin @naretevduorp You have gunk in your ears?

@RavynGoddess @MrKennethPowers @naretevduorp You might benefit by reading some about the racial bias in testing.

@MathyRobin @MrKennethPowers @naretevduorp Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard. “Evidence Presented: Data showed that Asian American applicants consistently received lower scores on Harvard's "personal rating" system compared to other racial groups, despite higher academic qualifications, while Black and Hispanic…

@RavynGoddess @MrKennethPowers @naretevduorp That's not the reaso for the Supreme Court ruling.

@RavynGoddess @MrKennethPowers @naretevduorp Oh, wow, Google! Such an authoritative source. Find me something peer-reviewed.

@sappholives83 What is it they do?

Men who “identify” as women aren’t oppressed because of what they are; they are disliked because of what they do.

@garylfrancione Hey, cowardice causing you to ignore calls to debate me?

Women don't want men, however they identify, in their private spaces. Some men don't want to be with other men in private spaces. Women and some men have the exact same interest. Why would you think your interest in using women's spaces should prevail? Does the man who thinks he's Napoleon get to use the Élysée Palace?

@RavynGoddess @MrKennethPowers @naretevduorp Yes, wrong artist. Point is the same. It is erroneous to argue standards were lowered because of race. Never happened. Conservatives like to argue that. Show me any organization that announced it was lowering standards to create more access for people of color.

@MathyRobin @MrKennethPowers @naretevduorp but he had to wonder because the system doesn’t give him a choice, as it has been normalized for a long time to meet a racial “quota”, and some colleges and companies lower admissions/hiring standards to meet that quota. And it wasn’t Brittney, he was telling Taylor Swift that…

He said he would question whether a Black pilot was qualified to fly. He said some women of color n positions of power had gotten there only because of affirmative action. That proves he was a racist, Mr. Bannon. Of course, if you would like to debate a well-educated moderate (not liberal) on the issue, let me know. I wouldn't mind at all using your forum to set the record straight about how Charlie Kirk really was.

@naretevduorp Prove Charlie was a racist.

According to whom was he "good at it"? He was good at sewing hatred against transgender people, calling Martin Luther King a bad man, saying empathy was a liberal tool designed by liberals to evoke emotions over facts, saying he would question whether a Black pilot was qualified to fly, and telling Britney Spears she belonged at home and should be subservient to her man. The list goes on. No, he did not deserve to be assassinated. But I am as happy he is gone--as much as anyone can be when the light of righteousness and true love overcomes the blackness of hatred.

You hated him because he welcomed anyone and everyone to have a conversation and he was good at it. That’s all. He won most debates with facts. Although facts are sometimes hard to digest, it doesn’t make them bad. It is reality. And surely aren’t worth getting murdered over.

@X_Corp Charlie King's assassin was a registered voter with no political affiliation. STOP THE LIE. Democratic activists had NOTHING to do with Charlie King's assassination. STOP USING Charlie King's assassination to foment anti-left divisive rhetoric and sentiments.

@garylfrancione @Katejsm1 That is a curiously narcissistic perspective. Only your view matters? Science be damned?

@Katejsm1 A man cannot be a woman. Sex is binary and immutable. I do not care what the NHS says, or what the BBC says, or what anyone else says.

If the trans controversy has taught us anything, it is that women's rights (and gay rights) are so fragile that men can claim to be women (and to be lesbians), and these claims get taken seriously. It's no different, and no less absurd, than saying women are witches.

Have you ever taken a human sexuality course? And if you did, did you pass? In every meaningful way, people can change their sexual characteristics. Even chromosomes dont necessarily differentiate men and women. Some people with XY chromosomes develop a females due to androgen insensitivity syndrome. In everyday life, no one walks up to another and asks what reproductive organs they have before inferring gender. Trans women have been in Miss Universe, been professional women's fashion models, and even wo the best woman model of the year. I suppose you imagine trans women as bearded guys wearing a dress and lipstick, with deep voices and Adam's allies. Now, that image is more akin to calling trans people witches (or sorcerers).

A PUZZLE FOR THOSE ATTACKING TRANS PEOPLE BECAUSE OF CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSINATION: 1. One assassin has a trans girlfriend. 2. One assassin killed Charlie Kirk. 3. As of September 2025, there have been an estimated 10,000 to 11,000 individual shooters involved in non-legal intervention firearm homicides in the U.S. 4. As of September 2025, there have been TWO individual shooters involved in non-legal intervention firearm homicides in the U.S. 5. There are about 324,460,115 people in the U.S. 6. About 1% of the population in the U.S. identifies as transgender. 7. Approximately 0.0029% of the U.S. population are non-transgender killers. About 0.000058% of the total U.S. population were transgender killers. POP QUIZ: Which is greater, transgender killers or non-transgender killers? ANSWER: If you said transgender killers, you need some remedial math. IMPLICATION: Attacks on ALL trans people because of TWO killings related to trans people in 2025 is biased, right-wing-generated propaganda intended to scapegoat a vulnerable population. RESIST: Silence and apathy are the assassins of Democratic Republics.

@X_Corp AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH FOR THOSE ATTACKING TRANS PEOPLE BECAUSE CHARLIE'S ASSASIN HAD A TRANS PARTNER: In the past five years (2018–2025), the United States has experienced approximately 4,100 mass shootings, based on data from the Gun Violence Archive, which defines a mass shooting as an incident where four or more people are shot or killed, excluding the shooter. Of those, seven shootings have involved individuals who identified as transgender or nonbinary. That accounts for roughly 0.17% of all mass shootings during that period. 🔍 Breakdown: • Total mass shootings (2018–2025): ~4,147 • Shootings by transgender or nonbinary individuals: 7 • Percentage of total: 0.17% This proportion is notably lower than the estimated percentage of transgender people in the U.S. population, which is about 1%.