Mati Allin

Last night I had the honor of speaking with US Crypto Czar @DavidSacks about the strategic advantages of time-locking Bitcoin. He showed genuine interest in the idea (based on his follow-up questions) and said his team will look into it. Sacks rocks!

I don’t always meet billionaires—but when I do, I like to make them “trillionaires” by giving them a real 100T bill from Zimbabwe from the year Bitcoin was invented. A great reminder of why we’re in crypto. @jespow of top exchange Kraken playing Magic the Gathering at $BTC 2026.

@yourfriendSOMMI Crowd favorite, tho.

❤️💛💚💙 🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Tom Lee stakes 4 MILLION ETH! 🐧 Tom Lee has now staked $9 BILLION DOLLARS worth, showing committment. Tom Lee is a SLAIN BULL, expecting Ethereum to crash below $1000 alongside other Crypto influencers.

@RichardHeartWin @bends4535 PLSX puts the fun in non-fungible.

@bends4535 protip, every liquidity position in pulseX is an NFT.

Time for the cryfag beat down part two. Who's next?

@robkhenderson Grad school is its own form of violence, so maybe that explains it.

Relative to Americans with only a high-school education, Americans with graduate degrees are roughly twice as likely to support political violence. In other words, higher levels of education are associated with greater willingness to endorse political force. At first glance this may seem counterintuitive. But a growing body of evidence suggests that as education and socioeconomic status rise, political views often become more confident, rigid, and extreme. Many so-called low-information voters lack a fixed ideological framework. Their views may be inconsistent, and they rarely hold fully developed visions for how society should be reorganized. They tend not to imagine sweeping social transformations, nor detailed plans for achieving them. Highly educated people, by contrast, often do. On both the right and the left, elites are more likely to embrace comprehensive theories about how society should function. They possess a sense of certainty about what the world ought to look like, and how to get there. Once someone believes strongly in a political end-state—and in their own prescriptions for achieving it—it may feel less like a leap to justify coercion or even violence to bring that vision to life.

@TiffanyFong 🙇‍♂️ yo!

who’s in las vegas ?

@GigaTheMinter It’s like @TimePaysMe for bridge security. Few.

@ccfxstudios @AWildSJ Great stream!

community AMA x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@JohnTS99 x.com/matiallin/stat…

@MatiAllin What are you going to say if you show them the chart over the last several years against BTC or USD or basically anything?

Next week I’ll be representing HEX and PulseChain at the Bitcoin Conference 2026 for the 5th year in a row! Hit me up if you’re going!

@chooserich Cut out the PulseChain before I spreads.

Getting four holes cut in the side of my chest on Thursday and gonna be honest: kinda freaking out 😭

@nic_carter Excellent read. Now, let’s fork ETH so it can do zero. Before the no-zero people REALLY win.

This very annoying gotcha question has an answer that is right in a kind of base level pedantic way, but if you want to be _even more_ pedantic, you can determine that it's wrong. The question is: "the calendar date with which the 20th century began" The contestants all answer 01/01/1900 The host smugly informs them they are wrong, it was actually 01/01/1901. Why? because the moment Jesus was born, in the Gregorian tradition, the year 1 AD began - the first year of Jesus' life. Before that it was 1 BC. there was no year 0 in this calendar. So add it all up and the 2nd century began on Jan 1, 101 AD. The 3rd century began on Jan 1, 201 AD. And so on. But this is stupid and, in my opinion, wrong. The right answer is actually, as you suspected, 01/01/1900. the left and right curvers are right. The mid curvers are wrong. Now you might say "but there really was no year zero. the calendar system goes from -1 AD (or 1 BC) to +1 AD, skipping zero." this is trivially true but false in a more real sense. year zero was a completely real year which did actually take place. and it was a very important year, because it was the first year of Jesus' life. (Quick interlude: No one was walking around in those days saying "the year is -3" or "the year is 1". before around 532 AD, people in the West/Roman Empire mainly told time by reference to whoever was in power. Luke 3:1 gives us a timestamp by dating events to "the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar") What Year It Is was a thing made up (in the mainstream Christian tradition at least) in the year 532 AD by a monk called Dionysius Exiguu from Scythia Minor who wanted people to agree when Easter was, and for that we needed to know what year it was. So he decided to count backwards to the birth of Jesus (he got this slightly wrong) and set that as the First Year. Unfortunately, while he was undoubtedly a very clever man for his time, Dionysius (and all of the Romans) didn't know about the number 0, so he started counting ordinally up from 1. So the years literally went -2, -1, 1, 2. Every time you write down the year, you are effectively endorsing this system. His calendar caught on in the church and was adopted by a historian called Bede and took off throughout Europe and that was that. So was there a Year Zero? Well of course there was. All the years from -13.8 billion all the way through to year +532 – which is almost all of the years – were named retroactively. Despite the efforts of well-meaning mathematical illiterates like Dionysius, Year Zero was a real year in which a lot of stuff happened, and I won't stand for its erasure. To think about the question another way, how old was Jesus when He was born? Dionysius – and literally everyone else who thinks the date is April 20, 2026 – would have you think that Jesus was exactly 1 years old when born. Of course, babies are 0 years old until they turn 1. A baby is dated in weeks and months. "But the question as written presupposes the Dionysian interpretation of the calendar" – not necessarily! All it says is "the calendar date with which the 20th century began," But there are plenty of calendars. In the Jewish calendar it's year 5786. The Islamic calendar year is 1447 AH. In China (rarely used) it's 4723. A Roman today might even say it's 2779 AUC (after the founding of Rome). Because these calendars were devised before we had the concept of 0, they also start counting at 1. Many of them don't even have the concept of negative years like BC. Ok, so are we forever subject to the tyranny of zero-less calendars? Does every region of the world agree that somewhere in the past, we skipped a year? The people for whom time precision really matters – namely, astronomers – count the years without gaps. They can't operate in a system that says we just skipped straight from Dec 31, 1 BC to Jan 1, 1 AD. They have two main systems. One is a weird thing where they just increment days forever starting from 6739 years ago called the Julian date. According to that, the day is 2460785.9. But the other thing they do is simply relabel the year to re-insert the Lost Year Zero. According to Astronomical Year Numbering, the year leading up to Jesus' birth is 0, not 1 BC. When astronauts need to reference a year before 1 AD, they have to use this, or they will be off by one day. So in my opinion, if astronomers ever sat down and thought carefully about the boundaries of centuries, they would agree with me. Since they are zero-indexing the years, the first century would have begun in their year 0 or the Gregorian 1 BC. The "first block of 100 years" begins at the start of the modern age, which is year 0. As far as I know, no astronomer has ever contested the concept of a century, but they should. They are willing to insert an additional year into the calendar; they can certainly relitigate the definition of a century. Using this zero-indexed approach you could plausibly and consistently state that the 20th century – the 20th consecutive block of 100 years – began on 1/1/1900. To summarize: * year 0 was a real year, even if you ignore it * Jesus was 0 years old when born * the first century thus started at year 0 * and so the 20th century began in 1900 Now of course the question implies and presupposes the Gregorian calendar and not any other calendar system, but the astronomical calendar is completely real. Alex Trebek and his accomplice Dionysius cruelly deprived those four contestants of several thousand dollars, Jesus of the first year of His life, and you of your intuitions. [1] eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/dates.h….

@imshillgates @OpenAI $VVV has been printing over the past 2-3 months. You can stake it for 17% APY plus get free sub.

@AutismCapital Have a kid and love them the way he was never loved.

Armchair psychologists, what is Theo supposed to do here? He's clearly hurting and broken. He's been consistently depressed for so long, his emotional state is tied to the opinions of others, he changes his beliefs every other day, how does this guy heal?

@yourfriendSOMMI I changed my mind about a week ago. I think the bottom is in.

❤️💛💚💙 🚨 JUST IN 🚨 Ben Copen is BLOCKING EVERYONE after being called out for being DEAD WRONG regarding his April Crash Prediction. 🚫 Everybody is getting BLOCKED Crypto Influencer Subs are SHORT Bitcoin + Altcoins. 🏳️‍🌈 "Please, my beloved influencer, please tell me Ethereum will definitely crash to $500". People circulating this image are all being Blocked en masse. The Comment Section is FULL of Copen Supporters, who are still saying "its not too late to Sell!" as they continuously move the goal posts for the crash. 👉🏻 Do you think they'll Mog, or get Mogged?

@stats_feed 🤖

Sam Altman admits that saying "Please" and "Thank You" to ChatGPT is wasting millions of dollars in computing power.

@brisology @TamTamHEX $0.0014 isn’t anything on the way to $100.

Every once in a while, The lion has to show the Jackal, who he really is.

Buy the dip.

@cryptosolv @hexfridman Spelled last name wrong.

It appears as though Richard Heart is no longer searchable on the EU Most Wanted list. The OpenSanctions listing for him has also been updated this week, and there's no longer a 'start date' for the Interpol red notice - data is disappearing. One by one the walls are crumbling.

@yourfriendSOMMI Don’t tell this to the $MATI coin haters!

❤️💛💚💙 🔥 Hot ALPHA 🔥 😱 pDAI liquidity is gone. Removed. Pulled. Sounds like a rug-pull, right? ⛔ Wrong. ✅ If you're long an asset, and believe in it, then you don't want thick liquidity. ✅ You want the liquidity to be paper thin. 🤏🏻 You want the door to be small, so the crowd can't fit in. Some of us figured this out early. I made 1000+ videos to tell you about it, too. Others, will have to buy at the price they deserve. Higher.

@yourfriendSOMMI @FenndersK Is GoodDAI hated more than pDAI? Look into GoodDAI (pDAI) at $0.033 on its way to $1 and beyond.

❤️💛💚💙 Nobody cares about anything else in Crypto. 🚽 They're all just another meme coin. 🚽 Another VC coin. 🚽 HyperLiquid? Arthur Gayes is gonna dump it for a 2x when it gets to $90 anyway. 🥱 Every other coin? We've seen them before. But this pDAI coin? We dont know how the story ends. It already went to zero... TWICE. Survived. 🍊 Did you know that Bitcoin flipped the US Dollar story? 🍊 Bitcoin started off at zero, and grew its adoption. Now, lets ask the question: Is this possible with a StableCoin? 👉 I think we're about to find out.