Sabitlenmiş Tweet

going to use last night as an example for this, but if anyone wants more proof/receipts I’ll drop them in a thread under this post🧾
‼️‼️YOU NEED TO MAX ENTER EVERY SLATE TO BE PROFITABLE ON UNDERDOG ‼️‼️
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
**that statement is wrong** (scroll to the bottom to skip straight to the advice) ✅
⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
🧠Thinking you need to max enter is an excuse/or bad advice. max entering increases the likelihood you place top .3% and increases your rack back💵 (this works for people who have large bankrolls and are good at auto’ing or just don’t like manual drafting)✈️
If you don’t have the time, or don’t like to auto - you can consistently profit on @Underdog__NBA on a week to week basis by playing 20-75 entries 💵💵💵💵
How do you achieve it? ⬇️
1.)Understand player exposure on standard 6 man draft style formats (the main GPP contest format on UD)
- players with adps from 1-28ish get drafted in 100% of contests
- in a contest with 10,000 entries, every one of these picks each make up ~16% of the field
So where’s the advantage for low volume players?
2.) go massively over the field on specific players. Last night the contest was filled with about ~16% Paolo Banchero in the early-mid 3rd round, ~16% Donovan Mitchell, and ~16% Jarrett Allen
(I’ll show my ownership and lineups entered in the pictures below)
…..but don’t focus too much on who the “smash” or “slate breaking” play will be after you’ve chosen your personal “over the field guys”
Why?
3.) remember, all of the picks 1-29ish are going to have 16% equity of the contest player pool
- there’s an advantage to this. If you choose to fade one player each from the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rounds and they don’t preform. You are now ahead of a minimum of ~16% of the pool (per player), scaling higher the more players you fade (the risk scales with it though; so be wise, don’t over do it)
💪🏼take strong chances on players whether it’s fading or overexposing - last night was a mid night but could have easily been another huge profit night while only having to risk less than 1/3rd of the max entry cost
Risk-> lower ✅
Max net profit -> higher ✅💸
PROOF IN THE RECEIPTS
you can see I faded some of the best plays on the night (2% Haliburton), and took strong stances on some of the worse ones (De’Aaron Fox)
But that doesn’t matter because this strategy is fun asf and the profitability shows in the long run 💥
Although last night wasn’t one of them; I’ve taken down a handful of large GPPs with this thought process 💭💬
Remember, DFS is for fun. But it’s way more fun when it’s profitable. Especially when it’s for years on end! 🤑💰💵💸💴
If you somehow made it to the end of this post; and it helped you out - all I ask is hit me with a like or repost and I’ll post some more tips




English


















