Max
28.3K posts

Max
@Max_Aragorn
Changing our world for better! Focus on: Mankind, Multilateralism, Monetary, Myths, Media, Monopolies,… https://t.co/BvOxHcOGjM


This is an extraordinary document written by the research arm of China's spy agency (the powerful MSS, basically the CIA and the FBI all wrapped in one) that absolutely zero media has picked up on. As far as I can see, I'm the first person to write about it even though it was published (in Chinese) on May 13th on chinadiplomacy.org.cn, a website of China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The document contains perhaps the most authoritative description of where China thinks its relationship with the U.S. stands, and where it’s headed. The title of the report is “The Great Global Transformation and the Path to U.S.–China Coexistence” and I provide a full translation of it in my article, the link of which is at the bottom of this post. To summarize briefly the most important - and, perhaps, surprising - aspect of the document: China's spy agency - the one institution whose entire job is to worry about the U.S. threat - has largely stopped worrying. That's really what transpires from the document. They use a strategic framework borrowed from Mao's "protracted war" theory and, according to this framework, America's offensive phase is finished and China weathered the storm intact. The question is no longer "how do we survive America?" but "how do we manage America?" - and they're proposing a six-step relationship recovery program. I'll let you read the full document as well as my analysis of it here: open.substack.com/pub/arnaudbert…

@TheMichaelEvery A good discussion about the global monetary system & its future. A first discussion talking about the two tiered money system, with “PRIVATE MONEY” as one tier. They call it out as Private Money! youtu.be/ShdnEy8tqTw















At some point you have to ask the question that the psychological architecture is specifically designed to prevent you from asking: What has American global dominance actually been for? Not in the speeches. Not in the official rationale. Not in the framing of the State Department or the op-ed pages or the foreign policy think tanks that exist to produce intellectual justifications for things that were already decided. What has it actually, materially, functionally been for? The Marshall Plan rebuilt Europe, specifically to create markets and prevent the spread of an ideology that threatened American capital. The NATO alliance extended American military infrastructure across a continent. The Bretton Woods system made the dollar the world's reserve currency, a structural advantage that has extracted value from the global economy ever since. The IMF and World Bank disbursed loans conditioned on structural adjustment programs that opened developing economies to American corporate penetration while dismantling the public sectors that protected ordinary people. The democracy promotion was the cover. The freedom agenda was the packaging. Underneath it: Markets. Access. Control. A global system organized to produce maximum returns for American capital and maximum dependency for everyone else. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented in American policy records, in the private communications of the people who designed these systems, in the words of people like George Kennan, who wrote in 1948 that America needed to maintain "the disparity" between American wealth and the rest of the world and should "cease to talk about vague, unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of living standards, and democratization." He wrote that. In a government document. In 1948. The people who built the empire never confused themselves about what it was for. They left that confusion for their citizens. Their citizens accepted it gratefully, because the alternative, looking clearly at what the empire actually is, what it has actually done, and who has actually paid for the American standard of living, is a confrontation that the psychological furniture was specifically built to prevent.

@KTmBoyle The global power hierarchy of the Private Financial Empire. TOP: OWNERS INNER CIRCLE: Masterminds POWER ELITES: Kissinger PUPPETS: politicians, presidents, oligarchs ENFORCEMENT ARMS: Five 👁, NATO, Fed MIND CONTROL: MSM THINK TANKS: PLANNING MEETINGS: Bilderberg, WEF Debtrix?

@MilkshakesPod “They” know the existing monetary system is failing & want to replace it with a new system that they CONTROL. How’re they going about doing it? Which organization is taking the lead? However, $auron’s, private money & monetary imperialism end has come🕯 worldeconomicsassociation.org/newsletterarti…

@kashyap286 Bilderberg select companies & they get the highest P/E, valuations in that marketspace to become a monopoly. Microsoft, Amazon, Google, FB, Palantir….thereby Bill Gates, Satya Nadella, Jeff Bezos, Eric Schmidt, Peter Thiel, Alex Karp,…are Bilderberg. Which new corp in 2025?



🇷🇺🇨🇳 Putin: Russia and China are building out transport links, including a trans-Arctic corridor that would connect them without going anywhere near Western-controlled routes. While the West writes sanctions, these two are building roads.

🇷🇺🇨🇳 Joint Declaration on the Emergence of a Multipolar World and International Relations of a New Type. Adopted on May 20 by Presidents of Russia & China following bilateral talks. 📄 t.me/MFARussia/29962

Most fund managers still believe Hormuz disruption is temporary There's no evidence beyond "this never happened before" and "because markets" to support this. Even if the Strait opens, the insurance, operational & logistical risks will constrain shipping for most of 2027. This is a psychological disorder @biancoresearch #oil #Hormuz #energy #geopolitics #shipping #markets #inflation #macroeconomics #petrodollar #supplychains


🇮🇷 Iran Demands Payment From Google, Microsoft, and Meta for Strait of Hormuz Cables Tehran has announced licensing fees on submarine fiber-optic cables crossing the Strait of Hormuz, targeting U.S. tech giants including Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon. The IRGC-linked framework runs in three stages: initial licensing charges, mandatory compliance with Iranian law, and EXCLUSIVE Iranian control over cable maintenance and repair. There is one problem. U.S. sanctions law makes it ILLEGAL for American companies to send payments to Iranian entities, meaning compliance is not a legal option. Iran knows this. The demand is leverage, not an invoice.




