MauraD
212 posts


Here's another "former liberal" who showed up to the conservative movement 10 seconds ago and now demands that we accept abominations like gay surrogacy, and then calls us "retards" if we dare to advocate for the conservation of marriage and the family, as we always have. I'm really getting sick of the "former liberals" barging into the movement and trying to set the ground rules. If you have this kind of contempt for the basic tenants of conservatism then guess what? You aren't a former liberal. You're a current liberal.


Studies show no elevated child abuse rates in gay couples vs. straight couples, adjusted for population size. Most perpetrators are heterosexual, reflecting their majority (~95%+ of adults). A key 1994 study (Jenny et al., Pediatrics) of 269 child sexual abuse cases at a hospital found <1% of identified adult molesters were gay or lesbian; 88% had documented heterosexual relationships. Mainstream reviews (APA, others) confirm no link between homosexuality and higher risk to children. Factors like family stress or socioeconomic issues drive abuse more than orientation.








People are Homosexuals because they got touched on/ molested



Conservative influencer attacked by gay couple with baby in West Hollywood after asking about parenting choice trib.al/aOOX3PL




Nobody should be permitted to use surrogacy under any circumstance


you may have noticed that all prominent right-wing personalities on here are suddenly attacking same-sex adoption, almost as if they received their new directives overnight, but I'm sure it's a coincidence




Gay surrogacy and gay adoption are predicated on the idea that gay men (or women) have a “right” to become parents. This idea is not only morally insane but also logically incoherent. It’s exactly like jumping off a building and claiming that you have the right to fly. Nobody has the right to defy the laws of nature. Where would such a right even originate? Two men cannot be parents. It’s impossible. Doesn’t matter how they feel or what they want. It cannot be. The only “right” at issue here is the right of the child. And the child has a right to be raised by a mother and a father, not two men masquerading as mother and father.

