𝓐𝓵𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓼𝓮𝓷

109 posts

𝓐𝓵𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓼𝓮𝓷 banner
𝓐𝓵𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓼𝓮𝓷

𝓐𝓵𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓼𝓮𝓷

@Mdhk911

肥宅但不肥

中国 上海 Katılım Ocak 2019
38 Takip Edilen3 Takipçiler
Kalru
Kalru@cipkalru·
@BattlementLK Are you serious? What's with all the china propaganda. China defended north Korea after they attack south Korea. China has more people in poverty than the us, a lower gdp, and a lower rate of innovation despite their higher population.
English
1
0
0
213
Battlement 🇱🇰
Battlement 🇱🇰@BattlementLK·
China isn't adopting American Capitalism. America is desperately attempting to adopt Chinese Socialism. Trump's MAGA movement was a failed attempt at achieving Chinese prosperity without the Socialism.
Battlement 🇱🇰 tweet media
English
31
37
261
5.4K
李婧🇨🇳
李婧🇨🇳@hezehua5·
世界在变,但年轻人对“教员”的敬仰,却愈发炽热🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳#致敬 #少年强则国强
李婧🇨🇳 tweet media
中文
199
141
2.7K
374.8K
待命
待命@O9EeNGaqngy5EA9·
@visit_spring 我很好奇 发这种帖子的人 自己长啥模样😂 自己的母亲长啥模样😂
中文
13
0
6
3.4K
拜访春天 🇨🇳
拜访春天 🇨🇳@visit_spring·
同样穿蓝衣,: 上图端庄雅丽, 眼里看到了江山如画和万家灯火。下图是谄媚畏惧, 眼里似在说"大爷, 快来玩呀"~
拜访春天 🇨🇳 tweet media
中文
117
144
1K
111.2K
Paul Castillo
Paul Castillo@HEAVY_SLAYER·
@pubity China can invest all they want into R and D, the Chinese brain still lacks creativity.
English
4
0
1
555
Pubity
Pubity@pubity·
China has officially surpassed the U.S. in overall Research and Development spending, putting over $800 billion total into technological advancement. The U.S. was the world leader in all-time R&D spending for almost a century before getting beaten by China.
Pubity tweet mediaPubity tweet media
English
67
210
1.8K
53.7K
菁菁乐道(lydia)
菁菁乐道(lydia)@lydia488144315·
中国刚刚让硅谷整个人工智能产业看起来像个骗局。 美国政府花了三年时间试图阻止中国开发具有竞争力的AI。 但结果却适得其反,惨败。 事情经过是这样的: 昨天,一家名为DeepSeek的中国初创公司发布了一款名为V4的全新AI模型。 它的性能与OpenAI和Anthropic的最佳模型不相上下。 价格却只有它们的七分之一。 而且,有史以来第一次,它是用中国芯片构建的,而不是美国芯片。 最后一点让西方感到恐惧。 背景: 自2022年以来,美国禁止向中国出口先进的AI芯片。这项战略的整个基础是:如果中国无法获得英伟达的顶级硬件,就无法开发前沿AI。 但DeepSeek刚刚证明这一假设是错误的。 他们的V4模型是在华为昇腾芯片上训练和运行的。华为花了数月时间与 DeepSeek 直接合作,确保 V4 版本能在其全线 AI 处理器上运行。 黄仁勋甚至在最近的播客节目中预言了这一点:“如果 DeepSeek 率先在华为平台上发布,那对我们国家来说将是灾难性的。” 而这一天已经到来。 而且数据令人震惊: DeepSeek V4 每百万个输出代币的成本为 3.48 美元。OpenAI 的最新模型 GPT-5.5 的成本为 30 美元。Anthropic 的 Claude 的成本为 25 美元。性能相近,价格却便宜了 7 倍。 Uber 的首席技术官刚刚承认,他们使用 Anthropic 的工具,仅用了 4 个月就耗尽了 2026 年的全部 AI 预算。 如果 Uber 使用的是 DeepSeek,同样的预算可以用 7 年。 4 个月 vs 7 年。同样的工作。 但价格甚至还不是关键所在。 真正的问题在于DeepSeek在其技术报告中的做法: 他们公布了自己模型表现不佳的基准测试结果。 每家人工智能公司都会挑选自家模型表现优异的测试结果。DeepSeek对GPT-5.4和谷歌的Gemini进行了全面对比,发现其模型落后于前沿模型3到6个月,但他们仍然公布了结果。 他们根本不在乎,因为价格差距使得性能差距在90%的应用场景中都无关紧要。 所以,美国的出口管制并没有阻碍中国的发展,反而加速了中国的独立自主。 由于中国开发者被迫在资源有限的情况下训练模型,他们必须找到大幅提高人工智能效率的方法。这种限制反而成为了他们的竞争优势。 每一代DeepSeek的训练成本都大幅降低。V4延续了这一趋势。 与此同时,美国公司却在朝着相反的方向发展: OpenAI的GPT-5.5 Pro每百万个输出代币的成本为180美元。这比DeepSeek V4同等功能的价格高出51倍。 美国商务部长本周证实,尽管英伟达的先进芯片已于1月份获得批准,但实际上没有一枚芯片出口到中国。 所以,中国仍然打造出了前沿人工智能。而且无需美国芯片。成本却低得多。 市场反应说明了一切: 中国芯片制造商中芯国际股价飙升10%。华虹半导体股价上涨15%。DeepSeek的中国人工智能竞争对手智普人工智能和MiniMax股价下跌9%,因为V4也碾压了它们。 DeepSeek让硅谷的定价模式看起来像个骗局。 美国科技公司今年在人工智能基础设施上投入了6500亿美元。DeepSeek向世界证明,只需几美分就能达到同样的产出。 出口管制原本应该是美国的王牌。结果却教会了中国如何在不使用美国芯片的情况下,以无人能及的美国价格赢得市场。 黄仁勋说得对。这是一个糟糕的结果。 但这是美国自己造成的结果。
Ricardo@Ric_RTP

China just made Silicon Valley's entire AI industry look like a scam. The US government spent 3 years trying to stop China from building competitive AI. But this backfired HORRIBLY. Here's what happened: Yesterday, a Chinese startup called DeepSeek released a new AI model called V4. It matches the performance of OpenAI and Anthropic's best models. At 1/7th the price. And for the first time ever, it was built on Chinese chips. NOT American ones. That last part is the one that terrifies the west. For context: Since 2022, the US has banned the export of advanced AI chips to China. The entire strategy was built on the assumption that if China can't access Nvidia's best hardware, they can't build frontier AI. But DeepSeek just proved that assumption wrong. Their V4 model was trained and runs on Huawei's Ascend chips. Huawei spent months working directly with DeepSeek to make sure V4 runs across their entire line of AI processors. Jensen Huang even predicted this on a recent podcast: "The day that DeepSeek comes out on Huawei first, that is a horrible outcome for our nation." That day was yesterday. And the numbers are crazy: DeepSeek V4 costs $3.48 per million output tokens. OpenAI's latest model GPT-5.5 costs $30. Anthropic's Claude charges $25. Same ballpark performance. 7x cheaper. Uber's CTO just admitted they burned through their ENTIRE 2026 AI budget in 4 months using Anthropic's tools. If Uber had used DeepSeek instead, that same budget would have lasted 7 YEARS. 4 months vs 7 years. Same work getting done. But the pricing isn't even the big thing here. The real story is what DeepSeek did with their technical report: They published the benchmarks where they LOSE. Every AI company cherry-picks the tests where their model wins. DeepSeek ran the full comparison against GPT-5.4 and Google's Gemini, found they trail frontier models by 3 to 6 months, and printed it anyway. They literally don't care because the price gap makes the performance gap irrelevant for 90% of use cases. So the US export controls didn't slow China down. They ACCELERATED China's independence. Because Chinese developers were FORCED to train models with limited resources, they had to figure out how to make AI radically more efficient. That constraint became their competitive advantage. Every generation of DeepSeek has gotten dramatically cheaper to train. V4 continues the trend. Meanwhile US companies are going the OPPOSITE direction: OpenAI's GPT-5.5 Pro costs $180 per million output tokens. That's 51x more expensive than DeepSeek V4 for comparable work. The Commerce Secretary confirmed this week that ZERO Nvidia advanced chip shipments have actually gone through to China despite being approved in January. So China built frontier AI anyway. Without American chips. At a fraction of the cost. And the market response tells you everything: Chinese chipmaker SMIC surged 10%. Huahong Semiconductor jumped 15%. DeepSeek's Chinese AI competitors Zhipu AI and MiniMax dropped 9% because V4 is destroying them too. DeepSeek is making Silicon Valley's pricing model look like a scam. US tech companies spent $650 billion on AI infrastructure this year. DeepSeek just showed the world you can match their output for pennies. The export controls were supposed to be America's ace card. Instead they taught China how to win without American chips, at American prices nobody can compete with. Jensen Huang was right. This is a horrible outcome. But it's the outcome America built for itself.

中文
30
28
122
30.5K
Spencer Maqa
Spencer Maqa@MaqaChina·
@quarktalksss @lydia488144315 便宜量大管饱,许多需求不需要那么强大的模型。虽然我支持你的观点,但你有点无脑尬黑了,怎么不让中国模型发展了吗?DeepSeek这种务实说出自己的不足同时又给出足够的价格优势,不比华为小粉红那种遥遥领先强?
中文
2
1
6
747
Tony 移民乱谈
Tony 移民乱谈@TonyPalabra·
@jacksonhinklle It is true that it is cheap, but the quality is not as good as that of Gemini, ChatGPT, or Claude.
English
1
0
0
2.5K
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸@jacksonhinklle·
🇨🇳 DeepSeek releases next-gen AI model with "WORLD-LEADING" efficiency. China continues to steam ahead in the AI race.
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 tweet mediaJackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
140
645
5.3K
248.5K
𝓐𝓵𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓼𝓮𝓷
@zhngshng11434 @mai_lan46260 @xiangsaixue520 中国新闻曝光的还少么,抖音,b站,中国人民法院官网你自己去搜,你凭什么认为中国没有人权自由法治,你说半天,一直没有解释人权自由到底是什么,如果只是“对政治不能言论自由就没有人权”,那我也没话说
中文
4
0
0
49
小雪妹妹
小雪妹妹@xiangsaixue520·
中国能够让14亿中绝大多数人顿顿有粮,日夜有电,家家有水,人人有网,或许已经碾压全球95%以上的国家。很多我们习以为常的已经让外国人破防。
小雪妹妹 tweet media
中文
502
125
2.1K
140.7K
重生
重生@zhngshng11434·
@mai_lan46260 @Mdhk911 @xiangsaixue520 沒有我說的那些我去了也是只能看到表面,但是我想看到的是被隱藏的,那些才是最重要的,看不到,和沒有看有什麼區別?你說的那樣為什麼還要那麼多上訪人員?誰接待他們?他們的問題解決幾個?農民工的錢給了嗎?善意欠薪/惡意討薪?爛尾樓交工了嗎?沒有入住的業主的錢退給他們了嗎?
中文
2
0
0
42
how
how@RebornBoyLHC·
@Mdhk911 @Kenntnis22 发视频不是请示,过一下头脑,求你了,是视频内容要请示。常规请示是在宣传方面,但是这种就不是常规请示
中文
1
0
1
74
Iggie🚁
Iggie🚁@Kenntnis22·
评论区“绝杀”人民日报😆
Iggie🚁 tweet media
中文
489
136
3.6K
462.5K
𝓐𝓵𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓼𝓮𝓷
@zhngshng11434 @xiangsaixue520 没有言论自由,是指政治这一块的,并非说吃到过期食品,冤枉入狱,求救的权利都没有,反而现在因为短视频平台火了,很多被冤枉的事情被曝光后,政府机构会更快,更透明的处理这些事情,我不敢说100%被冤枉的事情都能妥善解决,但至少比没有短时间时期要更好了,言论自由仅仅限制政治这一块而已。
中文
1
0
0
51
重生
重生@zhngshng11434·
@Mdhk911 @xiangsaixue520 如果沒有言論自由,當家裡的土地被強徵、孩子在學校吃到過期食品、或者你被冤枉入獄時,你連發聲求救的權利都沒有。一個隨時可能被噤聲的人,只有隨時被處置的『生存』,沒有安全保障的『生活』。
中文
1
0
0
48
how
how@RebornBoyLHC·
@Mdhk911 @Kenntnis22 你说这话一看脑袋就没转过来弯。我跟你说,只要他敢发不要过度请示,那肯定是跟领导请示过才敢发的。不然就是宣传事故,要处分的
中文
1
0
33
2K
meituanwaimai
meituanwaimai@EQbczM4hUReNPQv·
@Mdhk911 @Kenntnis22 所有事都请示叫过度请示,有一件事没有请示就叫目无长尊。 人家不在乎你有没有请示,只在乎你能不能背锅。 请示领导=下属不想承担责任让领导选择。 过度请示=领导不想担责是下属太死板耽误事。 不请示=下属自作主张与领导无关。 领导说必须请示=这是我的功劳。 领导让下属随机应变=功劳给你后果自己担
中文
2
0
46
2.1K
Luckyboy
Luckyboy@Luckyboy1931923·
@Mdhk911 @Kenntnis22 你他md翻墙请示了吗?除非你监狱里面的,否则吃你md子弹
中文
2
0
28
1.8K