Jennifer Meadows

4.2K posts

Jennifer Meadows banner
Jennifer Meadows

Jennifer Meadows

@MeadowsJen

#MAGA #KAG #Trump #ProudAmerican Mom, wife, Christian, educated, sarcastic, sincere, blessed, fan girl, #GoDucks, #TurnOregonRed,๐ŸšซDM

Oregon, USA Katฤฑlฤฑm Ocak 2012
477 Takip Edilen275 Takipรงiler
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
AnUnimportantPerson
AnUnimportantPerson@TheUn_importantยท
@nicksortor The mask is fully off, now. Bills should be short & clear. If thereโ€™s an incentive for long bills, maybe we should reward concise, transparent ones instead. Otherwise, people use excuses not to pass it. So, remove the excuses and the SAVE Act will pass. x.com/TheUn_importanโ€ฆ
AnUnimportantPerson@TheUn_important

We the Peopleโ€”and Elon Muskโ€”Would Like to Know: What Christmas Surprises Are Hidden in This 1,500-Page Bill? Congress faces a familiar challenge: a 1,500-page bill must be approved to avert a government shutdown. Released just 72 hours before the vote, it raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability. Letโ€™s break this down. The Challenge of Comprehension The average adult reading speed is between 200-300 words per minute (wpm). However, when tackling complex or technical material, this speed often drops to 100-150 wpm. Given the sheer length of the bill, it would take an average reader dozens of hours to thoroughly review itโ€”assuming no breaks. This difficulty is compounded by the dense, intricate language typical of legislative texts. The Hidden Pitfalls Massive bills often include provisions that are overlooked until after passage. These "hidden surprises" can have significant implications. History provides us with cautionary tales: 1. The Patriot Act (2001): What Happened: Passed quickly after 9/11, this act granted broad surveillance powers, including the collection of phone and internet data from U.S. citizens. Public Reaction: Initially supported in the name of national security, public outrage grew as whistle-blowers and journalists exposed extensive government overreach. 2. The Real ID Act (2005): What Happened: Passed as a rider to a must-pass military and tsunami relief bill, it imposed new federal standards for driverโ€™s licenses. Public Reaction: Citizens faced higher state costs, longer DMV lines, and concerns over privacy and federal overreach. 3. Bank Bailouts in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (2008): What Happened: This bill created the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to rescue banks during the financial crisis. Less-publicized provisions benefited certain industries and institutions. Public Reaction: While banks were bailed out with taxpayer money, ordinary citizens dealt with foreclosures and unemployment, fuelling widespread anger. 4. Monsanto Protection Act (2013): What Happened: A rider in a funding bill prevented courts from halting the sale of genetically modified crops, even if deemed harmful. Public Reaction: Advocacy groups accused lawmakers of prioritizing corporate interests. The provision was later repealed following public backlash. 5. Omnibus Spending Bill (2014): What Happened: A 1,600-page bill included a provision raising limits on individual contributions to political parties, amplifying wealthy donors' influence. Public Reaction: Seen as undermining campaign finance reform, this sparked significant public disapproval. Why Such Length? Historically, transformative legislation was concise: ยท Homestead Act of 1862: 4 pages ยท Social Security Act of 1935: 37 pages ยท Civil Rights Act of 1964: 24 pages ยท Medicare and Medicaid Act (1965): 130+ pages In contrast, modern bills have ballooned: ยท Affordable Care Act (2010): 906 pages ยท Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021:Over 5,500 pages The increasing length is often attributed to: ยท Inclusion of unrelated provisions to secure votes ยท Legal language designed to minimize ambiguity ยท Influence of lobbying groups inserting favourable clauses The Key Question What surprises lie within this latest 1,500-page bill? And why must legislation grow so unwieldy? These practices challenge the ability of lawmakersโ€”let alone the publicโ€”to understand whatโ€™s being passed in their name. As weโ€™ve seen before, the true cost of such opacity often comes to light only after the damage is done.

English
1
2
4
246
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
jim
jim@jim03605830ยท
Any bill that is over 300 pages, released 72 hours before voting, is BS I donโ€™t care which side they are on. Itโ€™s complete BS. The bill that Obama had signed so many years agoโ€ฆ. โ€œon March 9, 2010, in reference to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).โ€ Nancy Pelosi Said this "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it โ€” away from the fog of the controversy". A bill shouldnโ€™t be impossible to read before it is voted on. When it takes longer to read it shouldnโ€™t be voted on until it has been read. Otherwise flat out reject any bill when itโ€™s too long to read. When a bill is too long to read, it makes many feel like they just jam packed it with lots of stuff that should be in it. BS fluff, waste, pointless money pits (congressional, and senate bonuses sorry I mean raises, different health care than what everyone else gets, Nancy use to have an aircraft the size of Airfoce 1 fly her to and from California that the government paid forโ€ฆ. The president I can understand, but reallyโ€ฆ.. the speaker of the house??
English
2
4
9
255
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
AnUnimportantPerson
AnUnimportantPerson@TheUn_importantยท
We the Peopleโ€”and Elon Muskโ€”Would Like to Know: What Christmas Surprises Are Hidden in This 1,500-Page Bill? Congress faces a familiar challenge: a 1,500-page bill must be approved to avert a government shutdown. Released just 72 hours before the vote, it raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability. Letโ€™s break this down. The Challenge of Comprehension The average adult reading speed is between 200-300 words per minute (wpm). However, when tackling complex or technical material, this speed often drops to 100-150 wpm. Given the sheer length of the bill, it would take an average reader dozens of hours to thoroughly review itโ€”assuming no breaks. This difficulty is compounded by the dense, intricate language typical of legislative texts. The Hidden Pitfalls Massive bills often include provisions that are overlooked until after passage. These "hidden surprises" can have significant implications. History provides us with cautionary tales: 1. The Patriot Act (2001): What Happened: Passed quickly after 9/11, this act granted broad surveillance powers, including the collection of phone and internet data from U.S. citizens. Public Reaction: Initially supported in the name of national security, public outrage grew as whistle-blowers and journalists exposed extensive government overreach. 2. The Real ID Act (2005): What Happened: Passed as a rider to a must-pass military and tsunami relief bill, it imposed new federal standards for driverโ€™s licenses. Public Reaction: Citizens faced higher state costs, longer DMV lines, and concerns over privacy and federal overreach. 3. Bank Bailouts in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (2008): What Happened: This bill created the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to rescue banks during the financial crisis. Less-publicized provisions benefited certain industries and institutions. Public Reaction: While banks were bailed out with taxpayer money, ordinary citizens dealt with foreclosures and unemployment, fuelling widespread anger. 4. Monsanto Protection Act (2013): What Happened: A rider in a funding bill prevented courts from halting the sale of genetically modified crops, even if deemed harmful. Public Reaction: Advocacy groups accused lawmakers of prioritizing corporate interests. The provision was later repealed following public backlash. 5. Omnibus Spending Bill (2014): What Happened: A 1,600-page bill included a provision raising limits on individual contributions to political parties, amplifying wealthy donors' influence. Public Reaction: Seen as undermining campaign finance reform, this sparked significant public disapproval. Why Such Length? Historically, transformative legislation was concise: ยท Homestead Act of 1862: 4 pages ยท Social Security Act of 1935: 37 pages ยท Civil Rights Act of 1964: 24 pages ยท Medicare and Medicaid Act (1965): 130+ pages In contrast, modern bills have ballooned: ยท Affordable Care Act (2010): 906 pages ยท Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021:Over 5,500 pages The increasing length is often attributed to: ยท Inclusion of unrelated provisions to secure votes ยท Legal language designed to minimize ambiguity ยท Influence of lobbying groups inserting favourable clauses The Key Question What surprises lie within this latest 1,500-page bill? And why must legislation grow so unwieldy? These practices challenge the ability of lawmakersโ€”let alone the publicโ€”to understand whatโ€™s being passed in their name. As weโ€™ve seen before, the true cost of such opacity often comes to light only after the damage is done.
GIF
English
7
44
80
32.1K
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
James Powell
James Powell@CoachPapaDocยท
@TheUn_important EXCELLENT INFORMATION- THIS IS A MUST READ TEXT! WE MUST OBLITERATE THE FILIBUSTER & IMMEDIATELY PASS YHE SAVE ACT! THIS REALLY ISNโ€™T DEBATABLE!!
English
0
5
22
387
Jennifer Meadows
Jennifer Meadows@MeadowsJenยท
@Breaking911 FINALLY!!! Some progress on something important coming out of Congress! Letโ€™s hope the Senate can keep the momentum. Basic common-sense legislation shouldnโ€™t be this hard! They act like itโ€™s their ๐Ÿ’ต when they want to spend, but rarely when it comes to savings or safety for us.
English
0
0
1
15
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
Breaking911
Breaking911@Breaking911ยท
๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: The House of Representatives has passed a bill mandating automatic deportation for illegal aliens who commit welfare fraud, in a 231โ€“186 vote.
English
2.9K
6.3K
59.1K
2M
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaughยท
๐Ÿšจ HOLY CRAP. President Trump is now considering PULLING OUT from the Strait of Hormuz after defeating Iran, forcing our โ€œalliesโ€ to defend it themselves No free rides! โ€œI wonder what would happen if we โ€œfinished offโ€ whatโ€™s left of the Iranian Terror State, and let the Countries that use it, we donโ€™t, be responsible for the so called โ€œStraight?โ€ That would get some of our non-responsive โ€œAlliesโ€ in gear, and fast!!! President DJTโ€
Eric Daugherty tweet mediaEric Daugherty tweet mediaEric Daugherty tweet media
English
2.3K
3.8K
15.1K
868.1K
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
Dangerous Thoughts
Dangerous Thoughts@DangerousThinkgยท
@nicksortor Trump walking the Capitol with a bagpiper isnโ€™t just ceremony, itโ€™s a message. His influence is real, and the SAVE Act has 81% public backing. Senators ignoring it arenโ€™t leading, theyโ€™re blocking common-sense election integrity while the country watches.
English
22
178
1.1K
13.2K
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
Steve Austin
Steve Austin@ABPosse007ยท
@nicksortor @rreeves5 It has to be done .@SenateGOP or they will do it and eliminate you tooโ€ฆ Self preservation at this point.
Steve Austin tweet media
English
59
348
1.9K
25.5K
Jennifer Meadows
Jennifer Meadows@MeadowsJenยท
@nicksortor Better late than never, @USSupremeCourt Now, if you could get to work fixing the rest of the crimes and f*ckups being propagated daily by the activist judges, our nation would be a better place.
English
0
0
0
6
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
Nick Sortor
Nick Sortor@nicksortorยท
๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: The SUPREME COURT has announced theyโ€™ll be stepping in after activist judges BARRED the Trump admin from ending Bidenโ€™s Temporary Protected Status for over 350,000 Haitians Thank GOD! Temporary means TEMPORARY. SEND THEM ALL BACK. The nightmare being lived by the people of Springfield and so many other American towns will FINALLY be over. SCOTUS will be hearing oral arguments in the case in April. ๐ŸŽฅ @BillMelugin_
English
2.5K
18.7K
86.1K
1.5M
Jennifer Meadows
Jennifer Meadows@MeadowsJenยท
@libsoftiktok Itโ€™s very simple: Let the gentleman stay with Las Vegas Justice Court Judge Eric Goodman and his family - in their home - with the good judge guaranteeing Mr. Sanchez-Lopezโ€™s lawful behavior until trial. Apparently, judges, DAs, and legislators need to have real skin in the game.
English
0
0
0
22
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
Libs of TikTok
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktokยท
NEVADA SHERIFF FACES CONTEMPT FOR REFUSING TO RELEASE VIOLENT CAREER CRIMINAL Joshua Sanchez-Lopez is a convicted felon with 35 prior arrests Judge Eric Goodman ordered him relased with an ankle monitor But Sheriff Kevin McMahill says he is NOT releasing Sanchez because heโ€™s too dangerous. The Dept is now under threat of being sanctioned for contempt. Kudos to this sheriff! ๐Ÿ‘
Libs of TikTok tweet media
English
2.9K
11.4K
50.4K
1.3M
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
Right Angle News Network
Right Angle News Network@Rightanglenewsยท
BREAKING - Virginia voters are shocked to find out that Virginia Democrats are voting to exempt themselves from the new gun control measures they are imposing. โ€œThe provision of this section shall not apply to any member of the General Assembly.โ€ We warned you and warned you.
English
2.3K
19.5K
55.1K
1.3M
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
M.A. Rothman
M.A. Rothman@MichaelARothmanยท
๐•๐ˆ๐‘๐†๐ˆ๐๐ˆ๐€ ๐ƒ๐„๐Œ๐Ž๐‚๐‘๐€๐“๐’ ๐•๐Ž๐“๐„ ๐“๐Ž ๐๐€๐ ๐˜๐Ž๐”๐‘ ๐†๐”๐๐’ ๐–๐‡๐ˆ๐‹๐„ ๐Š๐„๐„๐๐ˆ๐๐† ๐“๐‡๐„๐ˆ๐‘๐’ Virginia Democrats are pushing sweeping new gun control legislation. And buried inside the bill is a provision that should make every Virginian's blood boil: ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜บ. The rules they are writing for you do not apply to them. The restrictions they are imposing on Virginians' ability to defend themselves come with a personal exemption for the very people voting to impose them. One Republican senator stood up on the floor and said exactly what needed to be said. ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ป๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ. ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ป๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜ซ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜บ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜บ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ. ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ ๐˜จ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฌ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด, ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ'๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ. ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜บ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ. ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜ข ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ป๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ. He is right. And his Democratic colleagues voted for it anyway. This is the two-tiered society the left is building in plain sight. They tell you that guns are dangerous, that civilians cannot be trusted with firearms, that public safety requires disarming ordinary Virginians. And then they carve themselves out of the very law they are imposing โ€” because apparently the job has gotten dangerous, and they need to protect themselves. ๐’๐จ ๐๐จ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ. Every Virginian who drives home late at night. Every woman walking to her car. Every small business owner closing up shop alone. Every farmer on a rural property miles from the nearest police station. They also believe this job โ€” the job of living their lives โ€” has gotten dangerous. But their need for self-defense doesn't come with a legislative exemption. If the right to bear arms is too dangerous for ordinary Virginians, it is too dangerous for legislators. If it is safe enough for legislators, it is safe enough for everyone. ๐“๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐ฉ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. We warned you. The gun control movement was never about safety. It was always about who gets to be armed and who doesn't. And now they have written it into the bill.
English
4
10
37
1.3K
Jennifer Meadows retweetledi
BARRON TRUMP
BARRON TRUMP@TrumpBarron_Qยท
๐ŸšจBREAKING: Trump proposed swapping out Pride Month for Veterans Monthโ€”how do you feel about that? Are you on board? A. Yes, B. No
BARRON TRUMP tweet media
English
4K
495
4K
78.3K