Meat Eater

288 posts

Meat Eater

Meat Eater

@MeatEater87

Katılım Ocak 2025
40 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
Meat Eater retweetledi
Auron MacIntyre
Auron MacIntyre@AuronMacintyre·
The brutal truth is that our entire system relies on abortion You can’t keep women in the work force without abortion You can’t maintain the casual sex culture and disrupt family formation without abortion Women with children find themselves dependent on men, single women find themselves dependent on the state Women are more likely to take abuse from employers, less likely to demand raises, less likely to oppose their replacement People have been conditioned to believe they couldn’t function in society without abortion, and at some level we’ve ensured that’s correct We’re far from the first civilization to base itself on child sacrifice but don’t lie to yourself, that’s exactly what we’ve done You can look back on the Mayans in horror because they did their sacrifices on an altar but they could never hope to match our level of slaughter Until the paradigm shifts there will be no popular support for it’s restriction
Cernovich@Cernovich

Abortion has never been more normalized or popular. The pro-life movement, if their goal is to save lives rather than pay themselves $400,000 a year to go on podcasts, should ask why they keep losing at the state level, rather than agitate against Trump.

English
308
2.6K
16K
615.4K
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
Yeah, I get it. Not fun to read. But also, not fun to write. Only necessary. When shit makes us uncomfortable, it's easy to look for reasons to reject it. And often we can find some, because no 2K word post can exhaustively describe a worldwide organization. 2K word posts are for expressing a single idea. When we look for reasons to push back against something, we stop saying to ourselves "Here is what we know. What conclusions does it all support?" and we start saying "Here is my conclusion. What facts can I find to support it?" Even if we find some, and make a good argument, which I'm not convinced you have, that's still turning the process inside out and backwards. My allegiance is to Western civilization, not the Catholic church. In any conflict between the two, I will immediately choose the former, with zero hesitation or regret. This conflict very obviously is happening right now, and that is true regardless of Church history, or any spiritual doctrine. I realize this places Catholics who like Western civilization in an unenviable position. I don't blame you for being unhappy. But finding excuses to blame the messenger is prioritizing your own psychological comfort over confronting the problem and thinking about ways to solve it.
English
14
15
482
19.6K
cTwelve
cTwelve@theCTwelve·
Look, I respect Devon. He's good friends with someone I care about, and that person is a good judge of character. Nonetheless, this is the most reductionist, obstinately materialistic take I've ever seen, applied to an organization explicitly founded against that. I'm not going to pick this apart in any detail. I will also grant that, to some degree, he does make a valid point against the material motivations and concerns of the Church. But my God does he miss the point! NOBODY joins the Church in pursuit of these things. This is the single worst organization on planet earth for ambitious young men to pursue worldly power and prestige. Oh sure, a high-ranking cleric gets pretty robes, but you seriously do not understand what it costs personally and spiritually to get to that point. You don't do this out of ambition; you do it out of calling. I have watched the weight of this office utterly, absolutely consume people, and yet they still keep going and in the process often become utterly holy. There's something here that cannot be explained. I've watched what even the lightest degree of that pressure does to seminarians. I've experienced it myself, and there is nothing like it, anywhere. It CHANGES you, as a person, deep in your soul. I've run businesses, served in the military. These are not the same things, and they're not interchangeable. Can it all go wrong? Absolutely. We've had two+ decades now of what that can mean; the Church tried thinking like you suggested and look what it got! And that leads me to my criticism. Devon, I offer this in the spirit of peace: you cannot understand a thing by remaining utterly aloof from it. You especially cannot treat a human organization as if it is some specimen under a microscope; people run the thing, and they have motivations that transcend the material. In the case of the Church, those motivations REALLY MATTER. You cannot treat this like some field expedition, where we narrate the strange behaviors of the natives from the aloof perspective of a National Geographic explorer. The Church has existed for over 2,000 years. It is the single oldest human institution still in existence and is arguably the oldest organized continuous institution in history. It has survived every attempt to destroy it, even attempts by sheer unmitigated greed and incompetence, and it is *still here.* Such things to do not hold in the worldview you're espousing. Finally, to your central thesis: current evidence suggests you're missing something very important. There is, in fact, a massive resurgence in Church attendance and new membership all across the West, primarily in the under-35 set but we're seeing all demographics. It's huge, it's sustained, it's much more conservative (or at least anti-leftist/communist) and it's proving durable. It isn't merely at the expense of Protestant attendance, either; many of them are totally new pagan converts. My little parish alone had 19 this Easter, in a vigil packed with the sounds of screaming babies. Do you know what a dying Church sounds like? Silence. The Church ain't silent. Never has been, but now the West is starting to remember. You wouldn't see that if all you do is sneer from the sidelines. Looke, you can believe as you wish, or choose to exclude belief. I'm not gonna argue faith or philosophy with you, unless you're open to it. But one must be willing to understand the other from the other's perspective, if one is to understand anything at all. To do otherwise is absolute hubris. Go in peace. And, truly: thank you for your friendship with Keen. He's a good man, and he respects you. That says a lot about you as far as I am concerned. But so do your own words.
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_

You have to start thinking of the Catholic Church as a business. Because it is. It has a product. It has revenue in the hundreds of billions, perhaps even trillions, per year. And it has customers. This is true regardless of whether it is tough to hear, or whether you regard the Catholic church as a legitimate spiritual authority. Businesses get revenue by catering to the wants of customers. Business retain and increase revenue by prioritizing the wants of their largest and most lucrative customer bases. So who are the major customers of the Catholic church? Religion is declining in the West, as is the fertility rate. Catholics leaving the church, instead of making new Catholics. The future of the church is third world, brown, and poor. And what do they want? They want religious justification for their resentment of the advanced and wealthy West. And the church will serve it to them. It doesn't matter to the church if the West falls. It doesn't matter to the church if the world trade network collapses and plunges that third world back into poverty. It doesn't matter to the church if we never reach the stars. It doesn't matter to the church if all of the planet becomes the African village and the Brazilian favela. They do not care if humanity is wealthy, healthy, happy, technologically advanced, or at peace. They care if humanity is Catholic.

English
17
3
72
12.1K
Meat Eater retweetledi
Rabbi Shalom Landau
Rabbi Shalom Landau@RabbiLandau·
"Low IQ" people aren't the problem. the problem is, people with a IQ level between 102 and 112... they are smart enough to think the are smart.
English
454
1.3K
12.2K
1.9M
Meat Eater retweetledi
Nicholas J. Fuentes
Nicholas J. Fuentes@NickJFuentes·
NEVER VANCE NEVER RUBIO THE IRAN WAR TICKET JUST LOST 2028
English
7.6K
11.4K
90.1K
4.4M
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
To be a high-contentiousness producer in a unity-based setting (e. g. a large company, a group project, female friend groups), while maintaining high-trust standards, is the equivalent of Chinese water torture. You will eventually see lower producers try to equalize contributions. Worse, you will need to tolerate completely incompetent free riders could do nothing but kiss ass and gain more resources than you. In a hunter gatherer society with male coded standards of competence, you would simply cut the parasites out from the root. Since many of these modern structures are now supported by feminized standards of need, you will soon come to the sobering realization that you will need to learn how to play this game of subterfuge to make it through, and it will feel like the day you lost your innocence.
English
0
0
0
17
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
@badazn People that sperg out over fine dining are at the midwit equivalent of wealth. New money. The tastiest meals with the perfect ambiance are in a home at a dining table.
English
0
0
0
113
Arthur Kwon Lee
Arthur Kwon Lee@badazn·
Every time I go out to eat I regret it. This includes posh restaurants that use the highest of ingredients. Everything I eat at home is always 1000x healthier and therefore tastier. I think I’m done eating out, forever.
English
28
10
147
8.2K
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
@joeybeastmarket That's because these "men" have chosen cats as the proxy feminine sink for what masculine energy they have left. Women choose to see the cats as a self-insert, not dissimilar to the mid female protagonist of a romance novel who effortlessly courts attention. Both are idolatry.
English
0
0
2
94
Moongazer
Moongazer@joeybeastmarket·
whenever you speak negatively about cats on this website rest assured the cat owners will become irrationally angry and hostile toward you. the parasite operating their brains will do anything it can to survive and reproduce and that includes acting very clearly mindcontrolled on social media. this either comes in the form of hostility or pictures of their own pets. right now there are multiple cat owners furiously typing their response to this only to hesitate, edit, and delete as they do not want to be seen behaving this way. however they won’t internally reflect on this because the parasite will not let them. cats are not a western pet
Moongazer tweet media
Moongazer@joeybeastmarket

@BonesawMD cat owners are infected with toxoplasmosis and behave erratically. cats are not a western pet

English
66
11
370
53.3K
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
@beherleader Intellectually dishonest. You start in the middle of the story and pretend it is the beginning, white knighting the woman now facing consequences. Wifejak points! Good boy! If you really wanted to offer the man accountability, then "don't marry a woman who doesn't support you."
English
0
0
3
45
Will Knowland
Will Knowland@beherleader·
How NOT to be masculine 1. Invite your wife to do things women don't enjoy 2. Sulk when she doesn't want to do them 3. Fixate on her hurty words rather than focus on the underlying feelings they expressed 4. Sleep on the couch and stonewall her 5. Bury yourself in work and hint at divorce
Reddit Lies@reddit_lies

She crushed any and all trust he had in her.

English
202
36
414
144.8K
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
Yes. To be neurotic is to be weak. Therefore all neurotic men are weak men (also known as male Democrats). If we are speaking on trad terms though, women do not have the authority to speak of men (yes, even the weak ones) in this way. You can deal with the issue of betas by simply limiting their access to you, as prescribed by the natural order. Anything further than that makes you a nagging feminist.
♡ Honey ♡@rawmilkhoney

Women are neurotic because we cannot physically defend ourselves and our children so our brains must have some kind of protective mechanism by assessing all paths to perceived danger. Neuroticism is built into us, it is natural. Men are built to face and fight perceived danger , they have literally 0 excuse to be neurotic. A neurotic man is a spiritual tranny

English
0
0
0
73
Qbertimus
Qbertimus@Jaytex45·
@yuripsycho100 The right answer? Genocide. The answer they want from you: trench warfare. That was WW1.
English
29
2
824
33.4K
maya !!
maya !!@koitojpg·
am i crazy did these not all happen in wwii
maya !! tweet media
English
4.6K
2.2K
185.1K
21.7M
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
Any output you see from that guy makes sense once you understand that they are a function of his motivations. The pertinent one we have seen too much of recently is "lust for white women." But he can't say that out loud. It's much easier to say "it's white women's fault for being the objects of my lust" or even better, "it's white men's fault for not protecting them from [my] lust."
English
0
0
3
816
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
Everything RFH says and does makes sense once you see what she looks like. The envy of a medium ugly woman, one who is not ugly enough to receive constant negative reinforcement, yet is not pretty enough to court positive attention, needs to be studied. She becomes a gaping hole for any crumb of recognition. You cannot understand this thread as a logical sequence of intellectual arguments. But, if you empathize with RFH, you see that engaging with Sarah Stock is a constant reminder of everything you'll never be. So maybe if you insult her just enough, you'll finally be at her level.
RFH🦎👁‍🗨🪐🌘 ⬛️ (Doctor)@hollowearthterf

Sarah no offense but these skin tight pants show the entire outline of your legs and no doubt the shape of your butt. Men see that and are no doubt aroused. Why is this not considered immodest by your own standards? Why are you not wearing a burka if a woman’s body is inherently pornography? Why draw the line arbitrarily at bikini?

English
0
1
6
371
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
> Taipei > My "Chinese" host > "real" Chinese food
Meat Eater tweet media
Eric S. Raymond@esrtweet

I have a story about this. Back when I was being Mr Famous Guy I was once an invited speaker at a computer conference in Taiwan. They had a dinner to honor the speakers Thursday night - took us to a five-star restaurant in Taipei. I loved it of course. I'm a huge fan of the Chinese food I can get in the United States. But there I was in Taipei at a native restaurant and...it wasn't different? Wait...what? I've been hearing all my life that the food I get in Chinese restaurants in the US is heavily Americanized and not much like actual Chinese food in China. And yet, everything I had at this native restaurant in Taipei seemed deliciously familiar. So I asked my Chinese hosts. And was told that what I was eating was not in fact normal Chinese fare but banquet food - the sort of thing a wealthy peasant family might serve at the wedding feast of their eldest son. I'm not commenting about Panda Express here, or low-end strip-mall Chinese food in general. I know that stuff is very different from real Chinese food, because I've had real Chinese food. In China. American low-end "Chinese" is dumbed down and sweetened, flavor contrasts and nuances all hammered flat. What I'm now more skeptical about is the oft-repeated claim that if you go to a high-end sit-down Chinese place in the US, you are still almost always getting an experience that would be bad by native Chinese standards. It would make a lot of sense that at least some Chinese chose to export and exhibit authentic feast food. I think standards in the US have risen during my lifetime, and it's now relatively easy to find Chinese food that's good by Chinese standards. At least in some parts of the US. Quality does seem to degrade rapidly with distance from major port cities. Foodie perceptions and popular mythology may not have caught up with this trend. That wouldn't be surprising.

English
0
0
0
49
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
@ashtonforbes People are tired of being henpecked around... you would think the commies would learn new rhetorical strategies, but all they do is shape shift into a new mask. "Reasonable Conservative" is the new one. And just as with "woman," in complete opposite of the literal definition.
English
0
0
0
21
Meat Eater
Meat Eater@MeatEater87·
@DineshDSouza You always have the most perverted analogies. Where does it come from?
English
0
0
0
4
Dinesh D'Souza
Dinesh D'Souza@DineshDSouza·
Plato once described the dog as friendly to its owner and hostile to strangers. Tucker is friendly to guys like Nick Fuentes and hostile to guys like Ted Cruz. Tucker poses as a dog “asking questions” but we know what kind of a dog he is based on whose rear end he likes to sniff
TCN@TCNetwork

Tucker: “I thought you were a fed!” Nick: “I thought you were a fed!” Tucker and Nick Fuentes finally put an end to the fed debate.

English
2K
525
3.4K
282.5K