SoyTekraom🌱

@AnCapShow What the fuck...

“Stickman v Animator is for kids” Stickman v Animator:

@MethMagickSS You forgot I'm white "Brutal war criminals, Genocidals & Rapists of natives "

Black culture: Nietzschean, brutal, cannibalistic, rapist White culture: Womanly, weak, nostalgic, sentimental

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 It's not about the concept of race because that could easily be valid if the groups fit together in the right way. It's because the racial model you defend is wrong in many ways

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 That alone should be enough excuse to exclude that group from that racial category, but that doesn't happen with humans, and they continue to insist on classifying Black or Asian people as a valid race.

okay

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 Inheritance of traits does not equate to a different race

@MeowscTEQType @swagalicous0912 I never claimed pre Genetics taxonomy was perfect ever, that's strawman #1. Phenotype was (and is) a useful proxy for underlying heritable differences. We observe, classify, then refine with genetics. When your wife has a black child after the army, the phenotype is informative!

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 Genetics itself is dismantling the concept of race as a strict category or as a clear-cut lineage; scientific moralism is unnecessary.

@MeowscTEQType @swagalicous0912 Many enlightenment figures used race in a modernist, anti racist view. Nevertheless, even if blumenbach and his contemporaries were evil racist scientists, destroying the categories based on that is a Genetic Fallacy.

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 You're right about that, but the reality is there, People who argue in favor of race today are simply people who ignore much of the human genetic diversity in order to draw artificial lines.

@MeowscTEQType @swagalicous0912 What do I mean by genetic fallacy? Take the abortion analogy. Early abortion practices had eugenic/racial extermination contexts -- but that doesn't make the procedure or modern arguments for/against it automatically invalid!

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 If not, it is simply considered part of the variety within the same group. Not a different kind of subspecies or race That's what happens in humans; what you observe is variety,not different races.Everything you observe is part of the same human race. I like these chihuahuas:

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 Taxonomic categories don't work like colors, where everything is gradual. For groups to be considered different in taxonomy, they must make significant leaps between groups that distance them more than they are as a whole.

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 Now do you understand why the categories of human races are more social than biological?

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 Well, let me tell you that it doesn't work that way in other animal breeds, since they are governed by stricter biological standards than we humans. You'll never see a Pitbull being genetically closer to a Chihuahua than to another Pitbull

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 Currently, the majority of the scientific community of biologists believes that human races do not exist and is not for ideology is for inconsistency , and the scientists who still believe they exist as a strict biological category present no evidence.

@HalloPro235 @swagalicous0912 Doing so would ignore part of human genetic diversity just to fit an idea of race that is not built from genetics, solely to please the ideals of the age