Michael Shpilt

LLMs vs. React UIs: I challenged ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, & Vercel V0 to build a complex waterfall view of traces & spans—using identical prompts. Spoiler: Unexpected results! obics.io/posts/best-mod… #VercelV0 #ChatGPT #React #Gemini #DeepSeek #Claude

AI boosts dev productivity, so do we need fewer software engineers? 🤖💡 Or do we need more engineers to add AI features in our products? 🚀🔥

I've released my book to the world today. Practical Debugging for .NET Developers is now free for everyone to read. michaelscodingspot.com/free-book/ #dotnet #csharp

@mrnebuda @realDonaldTrump Where are you getting those numbers? Even high estimates are no more than 30-40 thousand. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualtie…

This gotta be the most insane podcast clip of all time ☠️

I’d pay good money to have this guy introduce Trump at ALL of his campaign events. 😂😂

Just published a new blog post, check it out #BigTech michaelscodingspot.com/gafam/

There's an empty area outside of my office building. Here's how these geniuses parked today.

Worth watching

Got into some trouble with #TypeScript, so decided to write a blog post about it:) michaelscodingspot.com/typescript-api…

In the Debugger's Spotlight: A Year in Review devblogs.microsoft.com/visualstudio/i…

היה נחמד אם אחרי טיפול שקיבלתי בקופת חולים (נגיד תרופה), היה אפשר לתת פידבק אם זה עזר או לא. יש רופאים בינוניים שרושמים תרופות לא אופטימליות במשך שנים ואף אחד לא יודע מזה. תתחילו לתת תמריצים לרופאים על פי תוצאות! @IsraelMOH #מכבי_שירותי_בריאות

Check out my latest blog post: Recapping #csharp and #dotnet in 2023: Announcements, Conferences, and best Blog Posts michaelscodingspot.com/csharp-dotnet-…

8 דקות של עונג צרוף

In a unit test of a function, if you’re mocking internal functions’ implementation, it’s going to end badly. Clarification: you can mock settings or data, but not logic functions.

My latest blog post reached hacker news front page! news.ycombinator.com/item?id=386932…

@thurrott If I could replace Outlook's search with Gmail search, my life would be complete.

Me, to anyone still using Outlook.

Development slowness in big and legacy applications [and how to hurry it up] michaelscodingspot.com/slow-developme…

Gaza’s sky is black but Qatar is always sunny.

The presidents of @Harvard, @MIT, and @Penn were all asked the following question under oath at today’s congressional hearing on antisemitism: Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate [your university’s] code of conduct or rules regarding bullying or harassment? The answers they gave reflect the profound moral bankruptcy of Presidents Gay, Magill and Kornbluth. Representative @EliseStefanik was so shocked with the answers that she asked each of them the same question over and over again, and they gave the same answers over and over again. In short, they said: It ‘depends on the context’ and ‘whether the speech turns into conduct,’ that is, actually killing Jews. This could be the most extraordinary testimony ever elicited in the Congress, certainly on the topic of genocide, which to remind us all is: “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group” The presidents’ answers reflect the profound educational, moral and ethical failures that pervade certain of our elite educational institutions due in large part to their failed leadership. Don’t take my word for it. You must watch the following three minutes. By the end, you will be where I am. They must all resign in disgrace. If a CEO of one of our companies gave a similar answer, he or she would be toast within the hour. Why has antisemitism exploded on campus and around the world? Because of leaders like Presidents Gay, Magill and Kornbluth who believe genocide depends on the context. To think that these are the leaders of Ivy League institutions that are charged with the responsibility to educate our best and brightest. On the bright side, our congressional leaders deserve accolades for showing tremendous leadership and moral clarity in their statements, by the questions they asked, and the respectfulness with which they conducted the hearing. It was a masterclass of how our government and democracy should operate. If you have time, please watch the entire hearing. Throughout the hearing, the three behaved like hostile witnesses, exhibiting a profound disdain for the Congress with their smiles and smirks, and their outright refusal to answer basic questions with a yes or no answer.