Michael Henry

9.9K posts

Michael Henry banner
Michael Henry

Michael Henry

@MichaelTheHenry

nosce te ipsum or temet nosce | StrawManHuntee Turing Tester - Jeff Nitwitt

Hilton Head Island, SC Katılım Ağustos 2020
845 Takip Edilen3.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Michael Henry
Michael Henry@MichaelTheHenry·
The Covenant of Liberty: A Clear Explanation The covenant is the single most important idea in the American republic. It is the binding agreement that turns four very different moral traditions and every wave of immigrants who followed into one people. Without it, the United States would be nothing more than a collection of competing tribes. With it, the republic has survived civil war, absorbed millions of newcomers, abolished slavery, extended civil rights, weathered economic collapse and world war, and endured the identity politics of the last forty years. Here is what the covenant actually is, stated as plainly as possible. The covenant is the promise that all individuals are created equal with certain unalienable rights, that government exists only to secure those rights, and that its powers come solely from the consent of the governed. This is not a contract between interest groups or identity blocs. It is a moral and political compact between every citizen and the republic itself. Where It Comes From The covenant was first written in the Declaration of Independence in 1776: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” It was then given institutional form in the Constitution of 1787, which created a system of separated powers, federalism, and enumerated rights designed to keep any single faction (or any of the four moral traditions) from dominating the others. James Madison and George Washington repeatedly warned that factions are inevitable in a free society. The covenant is the mechanism they designed to contain those factions without destroying liberty. At its Core The covenant rests on five interlocking ideas: •Individual Sovereignty: Every person is the primary ruler of their own life. Rights belong to individuals, not to groups, races, classes, or genders. •Consent of the Governed: Government has no legitimate power except what free people voluntarily grant it. This is why elections, representation, and the rule of law matter. •Equal Protection: The law must treat every individual the same, regardless of ancestry, wealth, or identity. This is why the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were covenant-restoring acts. •Limited Government: Power is deliberately divided and restricted so that no tradition, no party, and no bureaucracy can impose its will on everyone else. •Pursuit of Happiness: Individuals are free to define and seek their own version of a good life, provided they do not violate the equal rights of others. These are not policy preferences. They are the non-negotiable terms of the American experiment. The four traditions (Puritan, Cavalier, commercial, and frontier) each contain genuine virtues and genuine dangers. The covenant does not erase them. It subordinates them. The Puritan impulse toward moral improvement is valuable, but the covenant prevents it from becoming coercive moral legislation. The Cavalier emphasis on honor and local loyalty is valuable, but the covenant prevents it from becoming hereditary aristocracy or defense of slavery. The commercial emphasis on contract and pragmatism is valuable, but the covenant prevents it from reducing everything to money. The frontier emphasis on self-reliance is valuable, but the covenant prevents it from sliding into lawlessness. The same rule applies to every immigrant wave: newcomers are welcome, but they are asked to accept the covenant’s terms. When they do, they strengthen the republic. When they do not, parallel societies and new factions emerge.
English
1
10
22
2.2K
Michael Henry
Michael Henry@MichaelTheHenry·
The real systemic racism today isn’t about White people holding Black people down. It’s a self-sustaining system inside Black communities that’s actually run by Black leaders. It works like this: Black neighborhoods get packed into heavily Democratic districts through gerrymandering, creating guaranteed voting blocs. The political machine then needs those votes to stay in power. To keep getting them, they promote a narrative that racism is everywhere and White people are the real enemy. The more you push this message, the higher you rise in the status hierarchy. In this culture, your status goes up the more loudly you complain about racism, Republicans, and systemic oppression. The loudest victims and professional activists sit at the top. They get book deals, TV appearances, speaking fees, and power. The school teachers, pastors, and influencers who enforce this narrative are next. They get respect and influence by attacking anyone who steps out of line — especially Black conservatives. Regular Black folks who just want to work, raise their kids, and live normal lives get very little status in this system. Success through personal responsibility actually threatens the narrative, so it’s quietly discouraged. It’s self-bondage. Black people have the freedom to vote differently but rarely do, because their entire social hierarchy is built on staying in the grievance game. The worse conditions get in their communities, the more it proves the narrative that they need more help and more Democratic policies. It’s a perfect system. The crop — the votes — gets harvested every election because the people running it have convinced everyone the chains are actually protection. And the people enforcing it most aggressively aren’t White racists. They’re Black leaders who’ve built their entire identity and income around keeping their own people emotionally enslaved to this story.
English
146
1.1K
4.2K
286.4K
Michael Henry
Michael Henry@MichaelTheHenry·
@chico_ray There is become a new hierarchy of status that is dependent on, not thinking for yourself, but being loud as felt against what has been labeled as oppressive. All the while the new free crop gets harvested. Votes
English
0
0
2
28
Chico Muya
Chico Muya@chico_ray·
Was the Left always this crazy? Why did I grow up believing that being on the Left meant you were a “good” person? Boy, was I wrong.
English
206
1K
6.2K
259.4K
Michael Henry
Michael Henry@MichaelTheHenry·
I’d say you are pretty good at thinking.
Samson Bigglesworth@bigglesw1

@AlBuffalo2nite I don’t know what to think anymore. When I was growing up I was told it was immoral and eventually illegal to segregate people based on race. Now Dems are telling me that it is perfectly fine to segregate Black people and that if I don’t see it that way I’m supporting Jim Crow.🤷‍♂️

English
0
1
11
488