Michael Walstedt, CFA

5K posts

Michael Walstedt, CFA banner
Michael Walstedt, CFA

Michael Walstedt, CFA

@MichaelWalstedt

Founder & Lead Advisor at Reliant Wealth Advisory. Tweets are not advice. Learn more ↓

Hoboken, New Jersey Katılım Ekim 2020
98 Takip Edilen7.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
I'm excited to share that I have officially launched Reliant Wealth Advisory, an independent, fee-only investment advisory firm. My focus is simple: I help individuals and families grow and protect their wealth through disciplined, long-term investing and thoughtful financial planning. I work best with: → Tech and corporate professionals navigating stock-based compensation (RSUs, options, ESPPs) → Business owners looking to diversify their assets beyond their company → Those who are retiring (or planning to within the next couple years) and want a clear income strategy → Those who recently received an inheritance (or any other lump sum) & want to make sure it is handled wisely → Anyone focused on building and protecting wealth over the long term If you or someone you know falls into any of these categories, I'd love to connect. Feel free to DM me or drop a comment below. You can also check out my website at reliantwealthadvisory.com. And if you know someone who could benefit, a simple tag or share goes a long way! #FinancialAdvisor #WealthManagement #Retirement #FinancialPlanning
English
1
1
9
2.2K
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
This is #writtenwithoutai 1. 99% of athletes need to work with financial advisors. It's very rare for someone to be able to do it themselves and do it well (@AROD). Look at history. Most either squandered the majority of their earnings or are flat out broke. 2. I agree there are A LOT of slimy people in the field. Odds are, most of these professional athletes do not need to be YOLO'ing a big chunk of assets into the majority of the VC deals they are pushed into. It's not a secret there are bad actors. But there are so, so many quality advisors out there that truly act in your best interest. They aren't pushing products on you to make commissions. They aren't putting your money into deals that only make sense for them. They want to make an impact on your life for the better. 3. @ochocinco says "don't tell me how to handle my money when you haven't made it." I understand the thinking here but I don't agree with it. If you were a wide receiver for a football team and you made a lot of money, does that automatically mean you know more about the tax code than an advisor who is worth a fraction of what you're worth but has studied tax savings strategies for HNW people for 20 years? I don't think so. I'm not saying that's me, but I know for a fact there are people out there worth less than him that can create planning opportunities for someone of his caliber that he could not even fathom. Now let's have a great day!
katsu@katsuxbt

Chad Ochocinco says he saved 83% of his $49,000,000 NFL salary and refuses to let financial advisors who "never made it" tell him what to do with it "You don't know who to tell no to. You got all these investment people. You know how many horror stories there are about NFL players that invest in companies?" "The best investment person is yourself. Do your homework. You don't need all these people because if they knew… name one investment person that's in a position that's rich" "Don't tell me how to handle my money when you haven't made it yet, to give me an example of what I should do. We put our money in too many people's hands. You don't know what's going on"

English
3
0
4
2.5K
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
@Dcpcooks @AROD I completely agree Social media allows too many people to get in front of a camera and say anything they want whether it's true or not
English
0
0
1
58
DCP
DCP@Dcpcooks·
@MichaelWalstedt @AROD I have a hard time believing he saved 83% Dude was unstable on the field and in the locker room but I’m supposed fro believe he was a master investor
English
5
0
7
852
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
Saw this tweet and reached out to @dougboneparth to see if we could set something up. He responded, got on a call and spent an hour with me sharing what he's learned building his firm. He's a man of his word and I'm grateful for the time!
Douglas A. Boneparth@dougboneparth

If you’ve become even remotely successful in your profession, one of the greatest things you can do is give some of your time to those attempting to follow in your footsteps. A 30-minute conversation can literally change someone’s life. It’s such an incredible giveback.

English
0
0
2
494
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
1-year forward return of mega IPOs $BABA $V $META $GM $RIVN $T $SNAP $UBER $MDLN $UPS History generally doesn't treat 'em well! h/t Exhibit A
Michael Walstedt, CFA tweet media
English
0
0
1
655
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
@trendingsectors NUA isn't on the table in that situation But the rollover decision still has real tax implications depending on your situation Happy to dig more into specifics if you want to DM me
English
0
0
0
12
Trending Sectors
Trending Sectors@trendingsectors·
@MichaelWalstedt Thanks. What about the more common case where the 401K contributions + company matches have been dollar cost averaged into an index fund for a decade or more? Is it still advisable not to roll over to an IRA after leaving the company or retiring?
English
1
0
1
17
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
If you work in tech and your 401(k) holds company stock, this is worth 3 minutes of your time. Let's say your company matches your 401(k) contributions with company stock, or offers an ESOP. Over the last few years, you have likely seen your stock benefit from AI and appreciate significantly. When you leave your job or retire, the default move is to rollover your 401(k) to an IRA. But if your plan holds company stock with a low cost basis, which is often the case with a lot of these tech companies, the default move to rollover to an IRA could cost you A LOT in unnecessary taxes. Here's why: everything inside an IRA gets taxed as ordinary rates when you withdraw it, which means you could pay 30%+ in taxes on your gains. Net Unrealized Appreciation (NUA) gives you a different option. Instead of rolling the stock into an IRA, you take it out in-kind. You pay ordinary income tax on the original (low) cost basis. Then, all the built up gains will be taxed as long-term capital gains - which can be as low as 15% or 20%, instead of 30%+. Think about that - you could potentially pay HALF the amount of taxes by leveraging this type of planning opportunity. Think about what this means if you work for and have been holding $NVDA $META $MSFT for years. Or even if you work for newer companies that have IPO'd in the last couple years like $CRWV $CBRS $CRCL. The window to use this strategy is narrow though. And once you rollover into an IRA, the opportunity is lost forever. If you are in this position, or know someone in tech that might be in this position, it's worth it to have the conversation before you make any moves. The opportunity doesn't come back.
English
1
1
2
1.5K
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
$SMCI down ~17% today is a good reminder as to why it's important to consider diversifying away from your company's stock. Imagine the people who held on because they were afraid of missing out on more upside after such a big move! The stock proceeded to go from $120 to $18.
Michael Walstedt, CFA tweet media
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt

If you work in tech and your 401(k) holds company stock, this is worth 3 minutes of your time. Let's say your company matches your 401(k) contributions with company stock, or offers an ESOP. Over the last few years, you have likely seen your stock benefit from AI and appreciate significantly. When you leave your job or retire, the default move is to rollover your 401(k) to an IRA. But if your plan holds company stock with a low cost basis, which is often the case with a lot of these tech companies, the default move to rollover to an IRA could cost you A LOT in unnecessary taxes. Here's why: everything inside an IRA gets taxed as ordinary rates when you withdraw it, which means you could pay 30%+ in taxes on your gains. Net Unrealized Appreciation (NUA) gives you a different option. Instead of rolling the stock into an IRA, you take it out in-kind. You pay ordinary income tax on the original (low) cost basis. Then, all the built up gains will be taxed as long-term capital gains - which can be as low as 15% or 20%, instead of 30%+. Think about that - you could potentially pay HALF the amount of taxes by leveraging this type of planning opportunity. Think about what this means if you work for and have been holding $NVDA $META $MSFT for years. Or even if you work for newer companies that have IPO'd in the last couple years like $CRWV $CBRS $CRCL. The window to use this strategy is narrow though. And once you rollover into an IRA, the opportunity is lost forever. If you are in this position, or know someone in tech that might be in this position, it's worth it to have the conversation before you make any moves. The opportunity doesn't come back.

English
0
0
3
882
Michael Walstedt, CFA retweetledi
Aman
Aman@AmanHasNoName_2·
If someone can fit 20g protein into a can of Diet Coke without changing the taste and texture , that recipe will make a bigger IPO than Anthropic.
English
241
814
24.5K
1.2M
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
@markcecchini I guess a better way to frame it would be in this situation, the person gets $8.625m from liquidity event, how do you determine that $4.5m is the appropriate amount to allocate to public equity portfolio?
English
0
0
0
18
Mark Cecchini, CFP®
Mark Cecchini, CFP®@markcecchini·
@MichaelWalstedt I mean it’s hard to give it a grade considering it’s a mix of planning and investment moves certainly leans risk on
English
1
0
1
99
Mark Cecchini, CFP®
Mark Cecchini, CFP®@markcecchini·
Everyone thinks they have money figured out until a $8,625,000 wire lands in their checking account. After that? We create the "personal capital stack". No guesswork. Just moving funds around and executing.
Mark Cecchini, CFP® tweet media
English
4
0
38
6.4K
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
If I was a @SpaceX employee I would be so excited for this IPO ... to sell my shares immediately
Michael Walstedt, CFA tweet media
English
0
0
1
414
Michael Walstedt, CFA
Michael Walstedt, CFA@MichaelWalstedt·
1,000 @SpaceX employees are unionizing to negotiate lower wealth management fees. I totally understand why they are doing it. 1% of AUM/year is way too much when you start working with clients that have high 7 figs/8figs. But I think using a 0.5% blanket rate is where it gets tricky because each person's situation can be very different from one another. Picture two SpaceX employees both have 10 mil in assets. One has equity comp and a brokerage account and that's it. The other has an extensive portfolio of rental properties, a few inherited trusts from grandparents, and equity ownership in a couple local businesses. These are wildly different engagements that require different levels of skillsets. The planning, the complexity, the time involved - it's not even in the same ballpark. Fee compression at the high end is healthy and honestly overdue. But negotiating one rate for an entire group assumes everyone's financial life looks the same. And it simply doesn't 🤷‍♂️
Exec Sum@exec_sum

BREAKING: Over 1,000 SpaceX employees are unionizing to negotiate better terms with wealth management firms The group has considered over 20 financial advisors and private banks and are "leveraging collective power to get significantly lower fees" of 0.5% on all AUM, rather than the traditional 1% fee The group is sitting on an estimated $20 billion in combined wealth

English
0
2
3
564