Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Midjority
9.8K posts

Midjority
@Midjorityrules
Asker of questions. Science and Philosophy enthusiast. Looking for value, offering what I can. I'm not right, but I'm not wrong. Love - Laugh - Learn - Live
Katılım Eylül 2014
110 Takip Edilen264 Takipçiler

@TexasAnCap Time now = distance between origin event initiated and current event occurrence
English

@LatFilosof Kind of like you couldn't have fully read and understood that paper 😏
English

@Midjorityrules Hahahahahaha, so you don't even bother reading. Ok, bye.
English

Science no more points to a designer than it points to naturalism. Some see design, others don’t. Some see hundreds of millions of years of suffering to be incompatible with a designer, others don’t. But those are not scientific conclusions, they are philosophical.
Blake Allen@BornAgainBalaky
According to science we are stardust. Either way we come from dust. But science points to an intelligent designer who made us from the dust as well. Christianity and history tells us that designer is Jesus Christ.
English

@LatFilosof Like I said, you're incorrect regarding your previous reply.
English

@Midjorityrules Just because I'm bored, I can chat about irreducible complexity. Here is something I wrote recently.




English

@Midjorityrules The only one there that is even remotely correct is the emergence of a mind. That is, for me, deeply puzzling. The rest is either incorrect or vastly overstated.
English

@Anglo_Chud @ZELLKLUMPEN It is though. If it's subjective then those with opposing views are just as correct as you.
English

@ZELLKLUMPEN The statement that morality is subjective =/= morality doesn't exist, you fucking idiot.

English

@xBalaamsAssx @needGod_net Because if you try to justify any way other than His sacrifice for us fully justifying us, you fall from grace and are judged according to your choosing
English

@Midjorityrules @needGod_net No, but why only focus on what we get? In a relationship we focus more on what we give
Thats where I think protestants set themselves up for major problems, they only focus on what's in it for them rarely focusing on what's there for them to give
English

Ah the exact word fallacy. Catholics need to realize this isn’t a good argument.
If faith alone means we are justified by faith apart from works, just take a read of Rom 4:4-5, Eph 2:8-9, Gal 3:2, etc.
MrCasey@MrCasey62
An Evangelical asks Grok a question. 🤣
English

@Midjorityrules @needGod_net Yes, another passage showing faith and works go hand in hand
English

@Midjorityrules @human4christ @needGod_net That isn’t true. You just posted Jesus saying that those who come to Him will not hunger and will not thirst. I believe Jesus here, what he is saying is true. Why do you disagree with Him?
English

@tharealjuanye @human4christ @needGod_net Then why are you wasting your time if that's what you believe?
English

@tharealjuanye @human4christ @needGod_net I partake of His flesh and blood that He gave for us in His sacrifice so that when the day comes I will never be hungry or thirsty again.
English

@Midjorityrules @human4christ @needGod_net So do you hunger and do you thirst? Because what Jesus says is actually true for me here. That if I come to Him, the manna from heaven (food INDEED and drink INDEED) I don’t hunger and I don’t thirst.
Do you still “hunger or thirst” when you “come to Jesus?”
English

@tharealjuanye @human4christ @needGod_net I agree, He told us everything we need to know for our salvation.
English

The New Testament itself says not everything was written down
“Stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter.”
2 Thessalonians 2:15
“There are also many other things that Jesus did; were every one of them to be written, I suppose the world itself could not contain the books.”
John 21:25
English

@human4christ @tharealjuanye @needGod_net I don't add to His Word. If He wanted to say more than that He surely would have.
English

Belief in Christ is the beginning, not the end. Even in the very chapter you quoted, Christ immediately goes into the Eucharist, obedience, perseverance, and abiding in Him. The apostles who learned directly from Him never interpreted “believe” as mere intellectual acknowledgment detached from sacramental life, repentance, worship, and transformation.
you’re quoting a Bible canonized and preserved by the same historic Church you’re dismissing. The disciples of the apostles didn’t teach “faith alone” in the modern Protestant sense. Read Ignatius of Antioch, Clement, Polycarp, Justin Martyr… they taught baptism, Eucharist, confession, apostolic authority, liturgy, fasting, and synergy with God’s grace from the earliest century.
English

@xBalaamsAssx @needGod_net Yes, I'm not saying that won't yield works, but it's not the works themselves that saves
English

@Midjorityrules @needGod_net But in what world would that belief not be reflected in action? Theyre the same thing
Were going in circles so I'll summarize it this way, whether or not eternal life was offered is irrelevant. You and I have 0% influence over salvation
The only thing we control is ourselves
English

@human4christ @tharealjuanye @needGod_net You're making a weird argument and dragging in things I never said. What I am saying is this, I believe the direct teachings of Jesus himself. "Q: What works must we do? A: Believe in Me"

English

@Midjorityrules @tharealjuanye @needGod_net So you think the people who learned directly from the apostles and handed down the faith all just got it wrong for 1500 years and only when Martin Luther came around were there real Christian’s lol 😂
English

@xBalaamsAssx @needGod_net What did he lack? Faith. If he had the faith he claimed to call Him good then he wouldn't have walked away sad.
John 6 28&29:(paraphrasing)
They said to Him, what works of God must we do?
Then Jesus said to them, believe in Him who He sent.

English




