@AlmaDeliaMC Fíjate que no necesariamente. Lo ves mucho en desarrollo de software. Los mismos pros se adaptan y la usan, y saben la diferencia entre el que sabe y el que nunca supo.
@syramio@cutecorestar It happens with everything. Art has became subjective. Some people like Mozart, some Bad Bunny. Some people "I ate the plumbs", some Manuel Acuña. Then the point goes to is it content or form? The craft or the message? Both?
@MightShel@cutecorestar I think that your comment was meant to be a response to someone else and you responded to me by mistake.
If not then, Who's "they" and who did what?
@syramio@cutecorestar "They" means the anti AI. I responded to you because I'm addressing who understands. As in "the anti AI think it's easy and not worthy of considered as art."
🚨 Los arquitectos van a ODIAR esto.
Alguien acaba de open-sourcear (SIII OPEN-SOURCEARRRRR) un editor 3D completo de edificios que corre 100% en tu navegador.
Sin AutoCAD.
Sin Revit.
Sin licencias de $5.000 al año.
Se llama [Pascal Editor]
Hecho con React Three Fiber + WebGPU → renderiza directo en la GPU a velocidad nativa.
Lo que trae adentro:
→ Jerarquía completa: edificio
→ niveles
→ paredes
→ losas
→ zonas
→ Undo/Redo total
→ Solo actualiza lo que cambias (dirty tracking)
→ Modos stacked, exploded o solo
→ Todo en el browser, sin instalar nada.
Puedes arrastrar paredes, reshapear losas, explotar niveles… todo en tiempo real.
Esto es BIM democratizado.
Las firmas pagan fortunas por exactamente esto.
Ahora es GRATIS y 100% open source.
REPOOO👇
I feel like yumetwt has an issue with fidelity. I first off want to say do as you please, im just sharing my opinion and if you disagree that’s alright and im open to hearing you out (co written by wife ok)
@Iwritestuff404@JudeJazzasWife@cutecorestar No. I love AI because it democratizated image production. For professionals like me it has opened up a lot of possibilities. And it's still a difficult tool. Unless you just say 'draw me a dog', you can't master it so easy. People's doing awesome stuff rn and they are missing it.
@MightShel@JudeJazzasWife@cutecorestar You just disproved the previous point. If not needing to know technique makes somwthing art simply because a human made it then using Ai to make ideas i to somwthing tangible is also art
@Iwritestuff404@JudeJazzasWife@cutecorestar Any tool in master's hands creates masterpieces. From pencil or waste (eg. pet bottles) to digital or AI. Ignorant people really think that AI produces whatever with a single instruction. Spoiler, it doesn't. AI great art is still human, creative, knowledge based.
@cutecorestar I don't see people who post these things ever praising "bad art".
of course the exception is if some art snob critic claims that the "bad art" is good, in that case they just pretend that it is good and that "We don't get it".
like this garbage that looks like ai slop.
@Iwritestuff404@JudeJazzasWife@cutecorestar They have never ever tried to generate anything with Ai. They think they can get whatever with one single prompt with zero knowledge of composition, color, etc.
@JudeJazzasWife@cutecorestar It also takes no skill to stick a banana on a canvas but thats still art lol.
Prejudicing how art is made is ridiculous. Thats not what makes it art any more than what the medium is changes art's nature.
@cutecorestar Art is art. It's good or bad not human or AI.
I've seen cases of "oh no, I thought this is so nice, but now I've discovered it's AI". If that's the case, the problem isn't AI, just prejudices.
saying ai is inevitable in the arts is such a defeatist mentality. don’t engage with it, don’t use it, push forward as human as you can be, challenge it and show that it could never create what a human can