Mike Anderson | 🤖 AI Automation
214 posts

Mike Anderson | 🤖 AI Automation
@MikeAnderson89
Advising founders and growth teams on operationalizing AI—to work in the real world.
Scottsdale, AZ Katılım Eylül 2009
251 Takip Edilen237 Takipçiler

Most teams exploring AI start with:
"What tools should we use?"
But the real unlock comes from a better question:
"Where is our workflow breaking down—and how could AI help fix it?"
A few hard-won lessons from a year deep in the trenches:
1/ Tool maturity varies.
Early-stage platforms often look slick but fall short on compliance, UX, or customization. Especially in regulated industries.
2/ AI ≠ plug-and-play.
High-impact adoption requires redesigning how work gets done—not just layering AI on top.
3/ The biggest risks aren't technical.
They're operational: misalignment, vague ownership, poor review cycles, and legal exposure.
4/ The opportunity is real—but only if teams reframe how they evaluate AI.
Don't start with features.
Start with friction.
Map the workflow.
Find the bottlenecks.
Then—choose the tech.
English

Lovable is a great tool for non-tech builders, but there's a learning curve. Launching on a custom domain & connecting to GitHub are key steps.
Here's how to navigate them with ease:
First, launching on a custom domain:
- Purchase your domain from a registrar (IE: Namecheap).
- Update DNS settings to point to your Lovable site.
- Verify & publish.
This setup enhances your brand's credibility and visibility.
Next, connecting to GitHub:
- Create a GitHub account if you don't have one.
- Generate a personal access token.
- Use Lovable's integration wizard to link your repository.
GitHub integration ensures seamless version control and collaboration.
The friction to build is less than ever, but the initial setup can be daunting. Once you master the basics, the potential is unlimited.
The divide isn't tech vs. non-tech. It's builders vs. spectators. Start building.
English

@thejustinwelsh I’m convinced we’re at the bleeding edge of an ‘artisan rebirth.’
It’s inspiring to see so many taking advantage of the tools to automate and grow new ventures.
English

@gregisenberg I just came across this concept via @ninjachatai's AI Playground feature. Tons of potential here.
Personally, I'm constantly switching between platforms. Having a 360 interface is a game-changer. Especially, as model capabilities and use cases evolve.

English

Is the new way to use AI using multiple apps at the same time? (grok3, perplexity, chatgpt, gemini etc)
i was sitting in my office last week, staring at a blank screen, trying to figure out how to get our latest saas startup idea off the ground.
we had a half-baked concept, some subscription thing for founders but no clue how to make it stick.
i was out out of ideas and my team was too busy to jam with me. normally, i'd just hammer chatgpt until it gave me something decent. that gets my creative juices flowing.
but i'd been down that road before. you know the drill: you ask, it spits out a polished-but-boring answer, and three hours later you're still tweaking prompts like a sucker.
this time, i tried something dumb. i opened four tabs—grok 3 "think", chatgpt deep research, perplexity deep research, claude 3.7 and just started throwing the same question at all of them:
"how do we make a saas for founders that doesn't suck?"
each AI gave me something completely different.
1/grok3 proposed a wild pay-what-you-want pricing model.
2/chatgpt outlined solid but safe features.
3/perplexity found real competitor data and user complaints.
4/claude warned about trust issues freelancers have with saas tools.
using all four together gave me a 360° view i'd never get from one AI alone. Pick your avengers, make your cocktail for the tasks you use the most (AI research, AI product designer, AI engineering etc). each with their pros and cons.
that was kinda my key insight that i thought i'd share (will tweet more about this if people are into this)
this approach totally helped me think through the problem. it dramatically increased our odds of success by surfacing insights and angles i'd never have considered with just one ai.
and it just really opened up "my creativity faucet". all of sudden i felt more creative and my clarity of what i wanted out of the product came to me.
yes, there are downsides. it takes more time, more prompting, and definitely costs more. but acknowledging that each llm has its strengths and weaknesses and using those to your advantage is a game-changer.
are you using multiple AI products for the same tasks?
i'm curious if others are finding similar benefits from this "ai cocktail" approach or am i just crazy
English
