Mike Sammons

1.2K posts

Mike Sammons

Mike Sammons

@MikeSammon81774

Katılım Temmuz 2023
64 Takip Edilen24 Takipçiler
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
NASA Artemis passing close to the Moon
English
18.8K
101.7K
1.1M
100.4M
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@SouthsideTilly @maddierune The punters are far less of a problem when they have to go to a legal brothel with security and standards of behavior where they are on CCTV cameras (not in the room rooms!) and can be identified through credit or debit cards, etc.
English
2
0
0
6
SouthsideTilly
SouthsideTilly@SouthsideTilly·
@MikeSammon81774 @maddierune We know punters want to hide in the shadows, while the prostituted women get all the public shame. "Much safer" and it still isn't safe because the punters ARE the problem.
English
1
0
1
12
maddie rune🪰
maddie rune🪰@maddierune·
Genuine question & I want people to actually think about this…and I’m not trying to start an outrage, I’m just a woman who notices patterns. Why do so many men feel comfortable being LOUDLY judgmental about women in sex work when statistically, THEY are the primary consumers of it? Every man I’ve ever met has had some version of: I would never date a pornstar, OF girl, or stripper…and okay, that’s valid, that’s your personal choice & your life…I do not care who anyone chooses to marry. And you do not have to respect her profession. BUT…you’re watching, you’re paying, you’re subscribing…statistically, 85% of you have at some point in your life…and then you go out in public (online too) & act disgusted by her existence? That’s not preference, that’s not a standard, that’s just projection. Because you’re not necessarily disgusted by HER, you’re disgusted by the part of yourself that keeps coming back. She didn’t create the demand…you are the demand & deep down you know that. So, the question was never really: how could a woman do that? The real question is: why is it so easy to shame the supply & never once examine the demand? At some point the man who consumes it & the man who condemns it have to realize that they’re the same man. p.s. — I’m not promoting or endorsing sex work. I’m not a participant & I have no personal stake in this. I’m simply doing what I do…noticing things.
English
92
27
228
9.1K
Omnomnom
Omnomnom@kronkingitrn·
@MikeSammon81774 @KinaCatGirl The research you are using allows anyone to submit a time where this happened, unverified. There are multiple entries of the same events, inflating data. These sport competitions listed also include ones where gender has no advantage. Most of the competitions are at small events.
English
1
0
1
25
Kina🐈‍⬛🪄
Kina🐈‍⬛🪄@KinaCatGirl·
Transphobes always talk about biological advantage, but when has a trans woman actually won anything that you can’t count on one hand? Out of all trans women who have competed, who actually won first?
English
35
7
240
6.2K
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@mykael_yuddy Your making it sound like evolution has a plan and plans ahead. All of the parts of the flagellum have to be there for it to work. You can't mutate and have one part of it then again mutate, etc. It all has to be there at once or it doesn't work and isn't a thing
English
0
0
0
7
Udy 💜
Udy 💜@mykael_yuddy·
In reality, structures that are necessary for a system's current function were not necessarily required in earlier stages. Evolution works by modifying existing components that already serve some purpose. A system can begin with a simpler function and, through incremental changes, develop new capabilities over time. Each stage only needs to provide a slight advantage, not the final perfected function. In the case of the flagellum, many of its proteins are closely related to those found in simpler systems, particularly the Type III secretion system - a molecular mechanism bacteria use to inject proteins into other cells. This suggests that parts of the flagellum originally served different roles and were later adapted for movement. Rather than being built from scratch, the flagellum likely evolved through the gradual repurposing and refinement of pre-existing structures. Evolution also frequently works by duplicating genes and modifying them, allowing organisms to experiment with new functions while retaining old ones. Even partial or simpler versions of a structure can still be useful - for example, for secretion, attachment, or limited movement - providing a basis for natural selection to act upon. Additionally, the diversity of flagellar structures across different organisms shows that they are not uniform or fixed, but vary in complexity and composition. This variation supports the idea of gradual evolution rather than sudden appearance. Given the vast timescales involved and the rapid reproduction of microorganisms, even small beneficial changes can accumulate into highly complex systems.
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774

@mykael_yuddy So how did the flagellum evolve in a single celled organism? Keeping in mind evolution is a series of genetic mutations where the beneficial ones are kept and the flagellum consists of way too many parts that are all necessary for the whole to occur via a series of mutations...

English
1
1
3
310
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@kirillXbasin @anxietymsgs Thanks for that. So primates is a group of different species that share some similar characteristics? It seems that the only characteristic that determines a primate is the grasping hands? (For example, dolphins have the other 3 characteristics)
English
0
0
0
4
Kirill Basin
Kirill Basin@kirillXbasin·
@MikeSammon81774 @anxietymsgs We are primates, a group that includes: monkeys (have tails), lesser apes (no tails, smaller than great apes) and great apes (no tails, larger). Primates have large brains, forward-facing eyes, grasping hands and complex social behaviors.
English
1
0
0
5
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@Lunar_Luster My guess would be the massive cost and complexity of setting up some sort of lunar satellite relay system. No doubt in the future when there is a permanent human presence on the moon something will be set up.
English
0
0
0
2
☆𝕃𝕦𝕟𝕒𝕣🌙𝕃𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣☆
Random thought cause I'm not a scientist but why couldn't they have sent a satellite that orbits higher above the moon that's not blocked by the moon and still has contact with Earth so they wouldn't lose signal when they're behind the moon? 🤔
English
140
4
473
55.9K
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@thecurioustales "The human brain can't process what this actually means...." Most people know this intuitively, it's how we catch a ball.
English
0
0
2
261
The Curious Tales
The Curious Tales@thecurioustales·
🚨SHOCKING: Artemis II mission isn’t “going to the Moon.” It’s aiming for a precise point in space where the Moon will be. 252,706 miles away . The human brain cannot process what this actually means. Every space mission you’ve ever seen depicted gets this fundamentally wrong. Movies show rockets flying toward a destination like an airplane flying toward an airport. Point at target, fire engines, arrive. Reality operates under completely different physics. When NASA launched Artemis II on April 1, 2026 , the Moon was somewhere entirely different than where the spacecraft will intercept it on April 6 . The rocket launched toward empty space, betting everything on a mathematical prediction of where a target traveling 67,000 miles per hour would position itself five days  in the future. Space travel is not transportation. It’s temporal ballistics. The Moon orbits Earth every 27.3 days, covering roughly 1.5 million miles of distance. During the ten day journey of Artemis II  , the Moon moves approximately 370,000 miles along its orbital path. The spacecraft launched in a direction that looks completely wrong to every human instinct, following a free-return trajectory that intercepts the Moon’s future position  , not its current one. This requires predicting exactly where an object the size of a continent will be located, down to mile precision, five days before the meeting happens. Any error in orbital calculation, any miscalculation in the Moon’s gravitational influences from Earth and Sun, any slight deviation in spacecraft velocity, and the crew of Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Jeremy Hansen  sails past their target into the infinite void of space. NASA engineers call this a “free return trajectory,”   but the name obscures the cognitive breakthrough required to make it work. You cannot think about space travel the way you think about any form of transportation that exists on Earth. Destinations don’t exist in space. Only intercepts exist. You’re never going somewhere. You’re always going somewhen. The mathematics behind orbital rendezvous calculations treats time and space as completely integrated variables. The spacecraft’s translunar injection burn on April 2  lasted exactly six minutes. Miss that window by even minutes, and the geometric relationship between Earth’s rotation, the Moon’s orbital position, and the spacecraft’s trajectory becomes unsolvable. The destination literally disappears from the realm of possibility until celestial mechanics realign. The Artemis II crew spent five days flying through vacuum toward coordinates   that would contain nothing but empty space if they had launched 24 hours earlier or later. They bet their lives on humanity’s ability to predict the future position of celestial objects with mathematical precision that exceeds anything we do on Earth. Today, April 6, they’ll pass within 4,070 miles of the lunar surface , reaching their maximum distance from Earth. But they launched toward empty space and intercepted a moving target with pinpoint accuracy across a quarter million mile void. Space doesn’t contain destinations. It contains equations.
The Curious Tales tweet media
The Curious Tales@thecurioustales

🚨SHOCKING: Artemis II mission isn’t “going to the Moon.” It’s aiming for a precise point in space where the Moon will be. 252,757 miles away. One miscalculation… and there’s nothing to land on.

English
78
565
2K
274K
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@michaelshermer I may have been except I can't remember what years I got my degree and i can't remember any of the tutors names or the other students and there are no records because when everything went digital, etc the old records weren't transferred.
English
0
0
0
32
Michael Shermer
Michael Shermer@michaelshermer·
If a total stranger told you "I graduated from MIT & Caltech" adding "but I can't remember what years I attended or any of the professors I took classes from or any of my fellow students", & said institutions had no record of the person attending, wouldn't you be skeptical?
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe

Just because Lazar lied about his education doesn't mean he lied about working at S-4 on craft of unknown origin. I hear that a lot, and I agree. But if you wanna see the kind of work that Tom Mahood did on the Lazar story, start here. Lazar Flaws – Education In this installment we’ll take a look at the educational background Lazar claims to have, and what, if any, parts of it can be corroborated. Background: On the “Billy Goodman Happening” radio program, December 20, 1989: Caller: Can you list your credentials? Lazar: As far as what? Caller: Schooling, degrees. Lazar: I have two masters degrees; one’s in physics; one’s in electronics. I wrote my thesis on MHD, which is magnetohydrodynamics. I worked at Los Alamos for a few years as a technician and then as a physicist in the Polarized Proton Section, dealing with the accelerator there. I was hired at S-4 as a senior staff physicist to work on gravitational propulsion systems and whatnot associated with those crafts. Caller: What school did you go to? Lazar: I’d rather not say, the reason being I am currently working with them under contract, and I’m having enough trouble with this as it is. >From “Alien Contact”, by Timothy Good, in a March 1990 interview: “Bob told me that he had attended Pierce Junior College, California, then the California Institute of Technology (Cal Tech), and the California State University at Northridge. A period of employment by Fairchild was followed by a return to Cal Tech. He claims to have obtained master’s degrees in physics (his thesis: Magnetohydrodynamics) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and in electronics from Cal Tech. To date, no evidence for these degrees has been forthcoming. Although physicist Stanton Friedman has been able to verify that Lazar did indeed attend both Pierce Junior College and California State University, he drew a blank at MIT. ‘There’s no trace of him at MIT and no record of him having attended any course. Maybe he took a lot of courses but didn’t get a degree – that’s a possibility'”. (Note of correction from TM: In personal correspondence, Stanton Friedman informed me that Good’s statement about Friedman’s verifications was in error. The only school Friedman was able to find evidence of Lazar’s attendance at was Pierce College. Friedman stated to me he drew a blank on Lazar at Cal State Northridge.) >From the Pre-Sentence Report, dated 7/27/90, for Lazar’s pandering conviction. This was as related by Lazar to the Parole/Probation officer preparing the report: 8-76, high school graduate, Westbury, New York (verified) 1978, Bachelor of Science Degree in Physics and Electronic Technology, Pacifica University (correspondence university). 1982, Masters of Science in Physics, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1985, Masters of Science in Electronic Technology, Cal Tech, California. >From the “Ultimate UFO Seminar” at Rachel, Nevada, May 1, 1993: Question: Bob, could you tell us about your education? I’ve heard a lot of conflicting things; I’d like to hear from you. Lazar: That varies widely. As far as electronic technology, my degree there is from CalTech and physics is from MIT. Question: Did you go to Pierce College? Lazar: Yeah, I did. Where did you hear that? Question: A friend that said something, somebody I don’t even know. I just thought, it’s something I want to ask, to clear my mind. Lazar: Yeah, I went to Pierce and Northridge and then…I’m terrible at dates. I don’t know what date I was at Pierce, probably like in seventy-six or something, I was at Pierce and then seventy-seven or eight I went to Northridge just for a short time for some classes, then I was at CalTech, and MIT after that. Later… Question: What was the year of your graduation from MIT, and did you get a Ph.D.? Lazar: No, it was a Masters Degree. The year. What was the year of graduation? Probably 82. On the “Lark and Craig Morning Show” KOMP 92.3 FM, November 1994 Craig: Well, you’re a smart guy. Where did you go to school? How many degrees do you have? Lazar: Two degrees. Craig: In what? Lazar: Physics and Electronic Technology. Craig: So what is that? A Ph.D.? What is that? Lazar: No, they’re Masters degrees. Craig: Masters degrees. Lark: Wow! To summarize Lazar’s academic claims on the basis of his public statements he received the following: A Bachelors Degree in Physics and Electronic Technology from Pacifica University in 1978. A Masters Degree in Physics from MIT (Thesis: Magnetohydrodynamics) in 1982. A Masters Degree in either Electronics or Electronic Technology from CalTech in 1985. Note that there is a reasonable amount of consistency to his story over its various tellings. However, at Lazar’s Rachel talk he said he went to CalTech, then MIT. Analysis: There is a lot of data to cover, so for a first pass through, let us just look at where Lazar was at various points in time, and consider the possibilities of his attendance at the various schools he’s claimed. Lazar graduated from high school in August of 1976 on Long Island, New York. Following that, the Lazar family moved to California, purchasing a home in the San Fernando Valley in June of 1977. It’s reasonable to assume that they had rented something in the area prior to purchasing the house, so that would have put Lazar in the area by late 1976 or early 1977. Lazar has claimed to have attended Pierce College, a 2 year community college, in 1976. His attendance at this college, although not the precise time period, has been verified by Stanton Friedman. Lazar’s attendance at Pierce is quite likely given that he would have lived fairly close at that point in time. Also in this general period, Lazar claimed to have attended Cal State Northridge “…just for a short time for some classes..”. This is possible and wouldn’t conflict with his general whereabouts. The next time we can pin down Lazar’s whereabouts was on July 27, 1980 when he married his first wife Carol. According to the marriage certificate he was living in Canoga Park and he listed his occupation as “Electronics Engineer”. Curiously, he also listed his highest grade of schooling completed as 12. His location is consistent with statements he has made about working for Fairchild Industries, which was located in the San Fernando Valley. Moving into the future, Lazar again surfaces 2 years later in the famous “Los Alamos Monitor” Jet Car story on June 27, 1982. The paper said the Lazars had moved to Los Alamos “…about a month ago from California.” >From other statements in the article, it’s apparent the Lazars had been in California for some time and that he had just started work at LANL. Yet this is the year Lazar claimed, on at least two occasions, to have received a Masters degree from MIT. However there is no evidence whatsoever that Lazar was anywhere other than California or Los Alamos during this time. Indeed, there is no evidence in ANY of the numerous public records concerning Lazar that he had ever been in or around Cambridge Massachusetts. When Lazar filed for bankruptcy in July of 1986, the information he was required to provide gives a snapshot of his whereabouts and activities in the years immediately prior to his filing. Is there anything in this mass of data that could even remotely allow for Lazar to spend a year at CalTech, obtaining his Masters degree, as he has claimed, in 1985? Well, in it he states that the only places he’s lived in the previous 6 years were 2 addresses in Los Alamos (Note that this is already incorrect since he didn’t arrive in Los Alamos until mid-1982). He also states that his occupation for the previous 6 years was as a photo processor at his residence. Oddly, Los Alamos employment was not mentioned. It also shows that he was very active in the Los Alamos area in 1985, borrowing heavily, apparently in part to support his photo processing business. For example, the records show that in March, 1985 he borrowed $12,000 to upgrade his business’s film printers. Other purchases in 1985 included a Corvette for $19,000, a number of personal loans, and finally a house in Las Vegas in June of 1985. If we are to believe “Omni” magazine (and I’ll leave that to the reader’s discretion), in 1985 Lazar was on vacation in Nevada and bought into a legal brothel near Reno. Again, the records clearly show that in 1985, and the few prior years, Lazar was either at Los Alamos or occasionally Las Vegas. There is not the slightest hint that he may have been working away at a Masters degree in Pasadena at CalTech. Now that we have an idea of where and when Lazar was, let’s take a more detailed look at what information is available for each school. W. TRESPER CLARKE HIGH SCHOOL, WESTBURY, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK:  There doesn’t seem to be any debate that Lazar did indeed attend and graduate from this school. In correspondence with Stanton Friedman, he stated to me, “Re the High School. Bob was graduated in August, not June, 1976, strongly suggesting that he had to take a summer course to get enough credits. He ranked 261 out of 369 (bottom third). He did take Chemistry. I obtained this information myself first hand from the school. They will undoubtedly deny giving the class rank to me since that is privacy act protected…it is a long story.” PACIFICA UNIVERSITY:  The statement in his Presentencing Report that he received a Bachelors degree from Pacifica, and labeled it a “correspondence university” is rather unique. I have seen a lot of statements made by Lazar concerning his education, but in none of them does he say where he received his undergraduate degree. It’s a subject he seldom mentions. Unfortunately, Pacifica University has proven difficult to locate. A number of national college directories were consulted, including those listing vocational and correspondence schools. A few of the guides were “The College Blue Book”, “American Universities and Colleges” and “The McMillan Guide to Correspondence Study”. Nowhere was there a Pacifica University listed. The State of California Department of Education’s Council for Private, Post-Secondary and Vocational Education was contacted. They regulate all vocational and correspondence schools within the state. They informed me that they had no listing for a Pacifica University within California, either now or in the past. A search of statewide phone records, at least in California, did turn up a Pacifica Liquor Store, but as tempting an explanation as that might be, it probably has no relevancy. Assuming Lazar was enrolled in a correspondence school by the name of Pacifica University in the late 1970s, it would now appear to be out of business. Unless Lazar himself is forthcoming as to just where this establishment was, additional verification efforts are likely useless. PIERCE COLLEGE:  Lazar’s attendance at this institution has been corroborated, although the extent of his attendance is not known. This was done some time ago by Stanton Friedman. It was also done a second time by Friedman after Lazar spoke at Rachel, Nevada in May of 1993. When asked to name some of his professors at MIT and CalTech, Lazar responded with the name “Dr. Duxler” at CalTech. According to Glenn Campbell, the only Duxler listed in the 1993 “National Faculty Directory” was a William Duxler, Director of Computing for Pierce College. According to personal correspondence, Friedman then contacted Duxler at Pierce, who was found to teach physics and math at Pierce. Duxler stated he never taught at Caltech. Further, Duxler checked his old records and told Friedman that Lazar took at least one of his classes in the late 1970s. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT NORTHRIDGE:  Some people looking into Lazar’s schooling at Cal State Northridge may have picked up a false positive due to an interesting coincidence. There WAS a Robert Lazar who attended Cal State Northridge and graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business in 1978. However a review of the photo in the 1978 CSUN yearbook, the “Sunburst”, clearly shows this is not our beloved Lazar, but rather someone else. As previously mentioned, Stanton Friedman stated that he checked with CSUN and found no evidence that Lazar had attended there. Timothy Good has apparently misstated that fact in his book “Alien Contact”. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY:  Standard inquiries have been made by George Knapp and Stanton Friedman and turned up nothing. Friedman informed me that he took the additional step of checking with the alumni office and at least the 1982 commencement list. Glenn Campbell visited MIT in 1993 and searched through a number of the printed student records there. The idea behind this particular effort was that while elimination of computer records could be within the realm of possibility, it is essentially inconceivable that some agency would have the capability to change printed records that had widespread distribution. Lazar, or any obvious misspellings of his name, was not listed in any MIT student directory between 1978 and 1990. Other publications checked included the MIT faculty/staff telephone directories from 1978-1990, the MIT “Degree List” from 1979-1990, and the 1989 “MIT Alumni/ae Register”. This exhaustive searching, coupled with the June 1982 Los Alamos “Monitor” story that puts Lazar in Los Alamos newly arrived from California, leads to the inevitable conclusion that Lazar did not attend MIT as he claims. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: Lazar has claimed, on different occasions, a Masters degree from CalTech in either electronics or electronic technology. Standard inquiries by Friedman and Knapp found no evidence of his attendance. A recent visit by me with Natalie Gilmore of the CalTech Graduate Studies Department provided some important information. CalTech does not currently have, nor has it ever had any sort of graduate degree in “electronics” or “electronic technology”, or anything near those names. CalTech does offer a degree in Electrical Engineering. Now if you have a friend or relative with an EE degree, you might, in conversation, refer to them as having a degree in “Electronics”, not realizing the distinction. However, if it is YOUR degree, it is highly unlikely after all the effort it required you would misstate what it was. People with advanced degrees, particularly in the science and engineering fields, are usually quite precise in the “pronunciation” of their degrees. Assuming Lazar had a bachelors degree from an unaccredited school (The two year schooling period and correspondence status infer this), I asked Ms. Gilmore what the possibilities were for admittance into a Masters program at CalTech. She said it was possible, although extremely slim, due to the intense competition for admittance to CalTech. She also added that the Masters programs there are one year and require full time attendance. However, Ms. Gilmore provided some additional data that actually support Lazar’s case, and in fairness should be mentioned. It seems that for most Masters programs at CalTech (including EE), a thesis is not required. Lazar has only claimed one thesis, in MHD, at MIT. Furthermore, I had previously made a fairly exhaustive search through many years worth of the CalTech yearbook, “The Big T”, and was unable to turn up any trace of Lazar. However, Ms. Gilmore informed me that graduate students are usually not included in the publication. So it would seem that my efforts in this area, as reported in the timeline, are inconclusive. However, the lack of on-campus evidence, coupled with his physical whereabouts still force the conclusion that Lazar never attended CalTech. His statement to the probation officer of a 1985 degree is particularly absurd in view of the activities he himself listed for 1985 in his bankruptcy papers. After plowing through all this data, it is enough to satisfy me, personally, that Lazar never attended either CalTech or MIT. Of this I am certain of beyond a reasonable doubt. How then do I explain the mystery of why Lazar clings so tenaciously to his claims of degrees from these institutions? I can’t really. To me it is one of the great mysteries of his story. I find it hard to swallow he would maintain such a story in light of all the means of verification. Of course there are other alternative explanations, but their probability is very small. Only Lazar has the answer of why. Possible Explanations: Lazar has lied, and continues to do so, about his educational background. In addition to all his other activities, Lazar was able to find time to pursue higher education and actually may possess a degree or degrees, but for unknown reasons wants to keep it secret and uses the CalTech and MIT degrees as a cover, taking the resultant abuse. The boys at S-4, as part of their efforts to discredit Lazar, in some way implanted the absolute conviction in Lazar’s mind that he possesses the degrees, making him appear a fraud to anyone checking his past. A note to the readers: This pretty much concludes the series, although I have 2 more installments planned. One is a list of little nagging questions, while not full fledged flaws, are still uncomfortable loose ends to the story that perhaps Gene can explain. Then finally a wrap up where I’ll look at a number of various theories from the wild to the sublime.

English
67
5
152
21.1K
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@TheEcho13 You should replace "Men" with "A tiny proportion of men" because most men don't want open relationships.
English
0
0
0
107
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@holisticgrenade I sometimes feel that's why many recreational drugs are illegal with heavy punishments. People using certain drugs start to think 'outside' the box and may be harder to control.
English
0
0
0
0
Riley Check
Riley Check@holisticgrenade·
The absolute worse thing that can happen to a free thinker is needing to work a normal job. This is because normal jobs are designed to stop you from thinking freely. Free thinkers don’t thrive in fluorescent-lit offices or outdoor jobs where they have to ask someone before they are allowed to eat. These jobs drain thier energy while the system programs compliance through repetitive slavery. It’s a scam.
English
60
162
1.2K
24.5K
Terrible Maps
Terrible Maps@TerribleMaps·
The average number of limbs per person
Terrible Maps tweet media
English
788
807
19K
13.5M
Ij
Ij@IJoukov·
@TheCatholicEngr And? A single modern cpu can do those millions of computations in seconds or worst case minutes. We had less computing power back then, even with 400,000 human computers. That isn't really debatable
English
1
0
8
469
The Catholic Engineer
The Catholic Engineer@TheCatholicEngr·
"We went to the moon in 1969 with less computing power" NO WE DIDN'T NASA employed 400,000 people at that time to run the calculations for us The physical machine may have had less RAM than today, but there were still millions of computations taking place With human brains
English
320
2.6K
43.4K
453.6K
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@Rohanburdened What's wrong with that? He's saying he doesn't want to rape so doesn't rape, like the vast majority of men in the West.
English
0
0
0
12
Rohan 🌱🔸️🇧🇷
Rohan 🌱🔸️🇧🇷@Rohanburdened·
I can't believe penn from penn and teller said this and everyone was just ok with it Most moral atheist
Rohan 🌱🔸️🇧🇷 tweet media
English
98
38
2.8K
514.4K
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@Lee_in_Iowa Boomers are so ignorant to reality it never ceases to amaze. My boomer parents paid way more in interest than that, but their house only cost 2.5 times dad's (just one income) annual income. The same house today costs 12.5 times annual household (not just one income) income
English
0
0
0
292
Lee in Iowa
Lee in Iowa@Lee_in_Iowa·
Boomer here. I bought my first house after ten years of saving like crazy. And the interest was 14.5%. I don’t know where kids got the idea that they were due a house and new car at college graduation, but that’s NOT how it ever was.
heretical lakeloon@loonlake55

Too many young people are resenting Boomers, claiming that Boomers had it " easy " financially in their youth. Here are a few fun facts about growing up Boomer. 1. Almost everyone grew up with one bathroom. Mom, Dad and all 3-6 siblings. 2. If you did get to take a vacation, you drove. With no air conditioning. No cup holders. No iPads. Just black vinyl seats and bologna sandwiches. 3. There were no club sports. No Parks and Rec activities. Summer camp was for rich kids. Get yourself a bike, a stick and a few friends. If you were bored, you laid in the grass and looked at clouds. 4. You ate what was served. Even if it was chicken livers. No DoorDash, no backup Totino's rolls. 5. No AP classes, no PSEO, no "fun" elective. They assigned you to a class. You went. You did what they asked. Or else. 6. Unless you had rich parents, you had a nice VFW wedding. Maybe rent a room at a modest hotel. 7. Most Boomers got their first pedi and mani in their 50s (when their feet got farther away). We didn't even know people got massages in real life, only in Hollywood. 8. You packed your own lunch for decades. 9. No one knew what red light therapy was, a facial, a spa day, or a cold plunge. Your gym was the YMCA. Usually in a rather old building. 10. We grew up with 18 percent inflation, 14 percent mortgage rates, 3 million continuing unemployment claims, and 200 other applicants competing for the same job. Now, this is not to say Millenials and Gen Z have it easy or don't face problems. It's just to say, nobody has it easy or doesn't face problems. My only hope, as my mom would say, is I live long enough to see my kids' kids complain about how easy they had it!

English
4.2K
146
2.5K
5.8M
Raven
Raven@Ravenismeee·
she's a 10 but she was born male. what is she?
English
592
17
249
16.7K
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@elonmusk And there will still be assholes and people with zero imagination who poohoo it. I think it's amazing!!
English
0
0
0
5
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Tesla self-driving saves a lot of lives – the statistics are unequivocal. That doesn’t mean it’s perfect, of course. Even when we improve safety 10X, saving 90% of the million lives lost in auto accidents every year, Tesla will still get sued for the 10% who did die. The 90% who are still alive mostly won’t even know that Tesla saved them. Nonetheless, it is the right thing to do.
Elliot Cohen@ElliotCohe74430

Tesla FSD just saved two lives on the highway. A man walked straight into traffic in heavy fog/rain at 65+ mph. The Model 3 spotted him and swerved safely. Could’ve been fatal for both the pedestrian and my cousin driving. Insane reaction time. Grateful for @elonmusk @Tesla

English
5K
16.1K
105.5K
16.7M
Madelaine Hanson
Madelaine Hanson@MadelaineLucyH·
Fascists can be neatly placed into three groups; a) Sociopaths and low-empathy individuals who are incapable of comprehending data or outcomes as anything other than quantitative "We must cleanse Europe of dark-skinned people or we will be extinct in 300 years. It's just maths." b) People who selectively apply fascist ideology for their own agendas, but don't feel it applies to them or their demographic/family "Obviously women shouldn't vote or get an education, but I got a degree and ran for office because I'm smarter than them." c) Low-intelligence people who feel rigid order and total control is necessary to protect them from the vague and frightening 'enemy' presented to them "Sure it was bad they shot those kids but we need the soldiers to protect us from those child-killers."
English
41
104
659
23.4K
Mike Sammons
Mike Sammons@MikeSammon81774·
@BurtMacklin_FBI Why the moon landing deniers? It's taken 60 years and we still haven't managed to do it again yet or it didn't happen 60 years ago. Nothing devastating there.
English
0
0
0
9
Burt Macklin
Burt Macklin@BurtMacklin_FBI·
I can’t help but wonder how hard of a time the flat earthers and moon landing deniers are having right now. It’s has been a devastating week for them.
English
85
5
208
5.7K