@m7saint@Thomasdc05 init it's as if she thinks she actually has morals. Trying to elminate the "bullshit" within the whoring out but is literally bullshit. I'm totally confused whilst writing this it makes no fucking sense.
@redpillb0t Money is just debt. No one wants to pay taxes but are forced to pay. You're meant to declare everything to the Government but no one in the right mind would declare money they gave to someone to be taxed on it unless they were going to benefit.
20 years ago today: TOOL released the single "Vicarious."
The music video — the band's second fully CGI video — was co-directed by guitarist ADAM JONES and visual artist ALEX GREY.
Fucking hate living in britain it's full of fucking morons. All they do is put shit in their heads. Completely fucking delusional. Cant wait for the narc to rock up again so I can put him in his place. These people are so fucking transparent its untrue. Miserable, lying and just downright stupid. Low lifes trying to get in my good life. Always trying to make me feel unsafe. ALways trying to make me feel upset. Everyone else is all so fucking perfect yet I'm obviously the one that needs sorting out. Even though these fuckign whores are putting their crap where it doesn't belong. Literal cowards. Literal wasters.
Fat dudes are less gay than skinny dudes.
It's just science.
They literally can't see their own dick unless they do some weird bending and squinting routine.
So over their whole life they've clocked way less dick than some skinny dude who stares at his dick every time he takes a piss or changes clothes.
Skinny guys are out here marinating in constant self-dick exposure. Brain probably halfway gay by age 25 just from visual overload. Meanwhile the fat king is living in blessed ignorance, belly acting like a force field. Doesn't even know what his own looks like half the time.
The bulk is protecting them.
Yes, the human data is mostly inconclusive—limited to small case series, preclinical models (mice/cell lines), and anecdotes. No large RCTs confirm efficacy/safety for cancer treatment. One cited paper was retracted over conflicts of interest. Promising mechanisms exist, but these aren't approved therapies. Consult an oncologist.
@RebeccaMKiel@BedroomFitnes@grok can you review these peer reviewed research papers for me please and give me the summary and highlights of each? I want to make sure what is being said is accurae
Sure, but your post didn't include links or attachments to the specific papers. Based on the thread context (Makis' work on ivermectin/fenbendazole/mebendazole for cancer), here's what peer-reviewed sources show:
1. Makis et al. (2025) Case Rep Oncol: Fenbendazole case series in 3 advanced cancer pts (breast, prostate, melanoma). Claims 2 complete remissions, 1 near-complete via self-administered FBZ + non-chemo therapies; no side effects, sustained 11mo-3yr. Highlights: Preclinical mechanisms (microtubule disruption, apoptosis). Retracted 2026 due to undeclared COI (author offered related services).
2. Baghli et al. (2024) J Orthomolecular Med: Hybrid protocol targeting mito-stem cell link. Recommends ivermectin (0.5-2mg/kg 3x/wk) + benzimidazoles (mebendazole/FBZ). Highlights: In vitro/in vivo data on autophagy, glycolysis inhibition, CSC targeting; safer than chemo in models. No large human RCTs.
Other preclinical (e.g., Anticancer Res 2024 review): FBZ shows tumor reduction in mice via HK2/pyroptosis. Ivermectin: apoptosis in cell lines. Human evidence remains limited/anecdotal; not approved for cancer.