Moe Dean

@kimmoFC Why is the 1st play only a foul on the defender when the offensive player leans down on him. That is a no call both ways.

I'm surprised but grateful that Kavanagh ignored VAR's desperate attempt to find another foul. They looked at everything but overlooked the very first foul. Incredible.

@StokeyyG2 Easily holding the goalie's arm down. VAR is to get the play right and they did.

NY Rangers for the 10000000000th time, FIRE DRURY. Trouba now with Ducks is shutting down the Vegas Knights after he shut down the Oilers.

@MLBONFOX How does MLB prove intent. They're mind readers? lol

Framber Valdez will begin serving his six-game suspension tonight unless he appeals. AJ Hinch will serve a one-game suspension tonight.

@TalkinBaseball_ Good. Now fire him for throwing Valdez under the bus.

AJ Hinch has been suspended one game because Framber Valdez hit Trevor Story. It's Hinch's first suspension since 2020

NY Jets fans during off-season youtube.com/shorts/-n1Uhq_…

Philadelphia Flyers falling apart.

@WildShitposter @GinoHard_ A pear sounds good right about now 👌. But that wasn't my question. My question is, is the top of the puck covered by the goaltenders skate?

@MoeDeann @GinoHard_ Guess we're making pear shaped pucks 😂

CHAOS IN ANAHEIM‼️ • There was NO initial call on the ice when the play was live • The officials discussed, RULED IT A GOAL on the ice • THEN there was a video review, NO video angle shows the puck completely across the goal line • Situation room confirms a GOOD GOAL ANAHEIM TAKES A 3-1 SERIES LEAD. INSANE. 🫨

@rzitup @verysaltydog @GinoHard_ I would give the refs more credit if they said we dont know, so NO GOAL, now lets review it.

@MoeDeann @verysaltydog @GinoHard_ Try to understand the rules Ref says goal Video doesn’t show not a goal That’s the rules. And now don’t say “ref didn’t see”. That’s not a rule. He did.

@rzitup @verysaltydog @GinoHard_ I get the rule and the rule is incorrect especially since the refs weren't around the play to be able to call it a goal. Plus if they call it a goal on the ice the video clearly shows it isn't a goal because you cant see the top of the puck which is covered by the skate.

@WildShitposter @GinoHard_ In this picture is the top of the puck covered by the skate of the goaltender?

@MoeDeann @GinoHard_

@rzitup @verysaltydog @GinoHard_ I'm not an Oilers fan or a Ducks fan. If it happened the the Ducks my reasoning would be the same show me in the video of the play where the Oilers shot crossed the line.

@MoeDeann @verysaltydog @GinoHard_ Oiler fans can keep crying until they find an excuse that makes the feel better about themselves. It’s an oilers tradition.

@WildShitposter @GinoHard_ Show me the puck completely crossed the line.

@MoeDeann @GinoHard_ You have 0 idea what you're saying 😂 btw the cgi ads they put on the board sand ice take more complex algorithms than this and even incorporate what I'm talking about

@rzitup @verysaltydog @GinoHard_ Then the rule is incorrect. The rule should be if you can show the puck crossed the line it's a goal. If you watch the play the refs aren't even in position to call it a goal or not, based on where they were on the Ice. Incompetent officiating.

@MoeDeann @verysaltydog @GinoHard_ Hey dummy, the rule is the exact opposite of what you are saying. Once it is ruled a goal, the video then has to be conclusive that it is NOT a goal, which you cannot prove. Prove to me it’s NOT a goal. Use your brain.

@40_eltron @BizNasty2point0 Well then the rulebook is incorrect. The simplest way to conclude a goal or not is whether you can show it clearly cross the line. What tends to happen is officials called this one a goal and in another instance call a similar play, not a goal.

@MoeDeann @BizNasty2point0 That’s not what the rule book says 😂😂😂

Common sense prevailed.

@WildShitposter @GinoHard_ But lucky for us I run into a guy that doea this for a living.

@MoeDeann @GinoHard_ You can do that in real time extremely easily... I do it for a living you literally just have to know the radius of the puck, and the resolution of your camera and you'll have your answer

@WildShitposter @GinoHard_ Resolution doesn't matter. You'd have to be able to know if the size of the picture is accurately reflected in its size. If I show you a small pebble zoomed in you could think it's a large stone. So you cant measure that correctly.

@verysaltydog @GinoHard_ If they huddled for so long. They clearly cannot know if it was a goal on the ice. But let's apply the rule as it should be. Even if they say Goal, fair enough. Now on the video show me it was a goal. They cannot, so, No Goal. The rule should be simple, so it always saves you.

@MoeDeann @GinoHard_ You’re applying the burden of proof incorrectly here, it was deemed a goal before going to review

@verysaltydog @GinoHard_ The rule in principle has to be clear and concise. You have to show the puck clearly crossed the line for it to be a goal. The skate blocks the puck, No Goal. This way in a less clear situation the rule saves the day because it is always adhered to in the same manner.

@MoeDeann @GinoHard_ There is literally visual proof, you just need to extrapolate a very simple projection. By your logic, is a shooting caught on camera sufficient proof if you can’t slow the footage down sufficiently to be able to visually track the bullet the entire way?